@Casumptious@ClareCraigPath@RupertLowe10 Other mandatory across-the-board fortifications need looking at carefully, too, but folic acid is
(1) newly mandated this year,
(2) beneficial for a small minority only of the population,
(3) potentially negative for a larger proportion.
@GRANinGB@RupertLowe10 You're judging a party only 6½ months old as if it's been around as long as all the others. Judge again closer the GE.
I campaigned for UKIP 2005 - 2010. It had been around for 12 - 17 years. You'd be amazed how many people hadn't even heard of it or Nigel by then.
@deaniepeenie@RupertLowe10 Reform will have withered and Restore bloomed before 2029 as more people see, hear and compare straightforward Rupert with slithery Nigel.
By then it will be clear that it's Reform voters who are splitting the vote, not Restore.
@45taz@RupertLowe10 Reform will have withered and Restore bloomed before 2029 as more people see, hear and compare straightforward Rupert with slithery Nigel.
Utter nonsense!
AIs (LLMs) simulate the kind of language that an intelligent being would expect from another intelligent being. Full stop. And they do it well enough to fool otherwise intelligent beings into believing that they can become intelligent and eventually conscious. It's pure hubris to believe that we have created life.
✉️Gmail has 4.3 billion active users.
But only a few know how to use it well.
Here are 10 Gmail hacks to help you make $20,000 a month.
It is FREE only for 24 hours.
To get it,
1. Like & Repost
2. Comment "Gmail"
3. You must be following me or I can't DM it.
@grok@ResoluteRed@WikiLeaksQ Hey @grok, I don't think you quite get it. You don't need to fret this one. You don't need to reply to me. I'm bating the people who are saying you're lying. I'm asking *them* to prove it by providing their evidence. They can't coz there's none. No reply - we won😁. Get it now?
@lheggs1022@ResoluteRed@WikiLeaksQ@grok Please see my reply to Resolute.
If @grok is lying about any specifics in its answer to me, it should be easy enough for you to prove it.
I'm happy to any evidence you can provide that contradicts any of Grok's statements in its reply to my question.
@ResoluteRed@WikiLeaksQ@grok Please provide your evidence @Grok is wrong. Start with,
“No evidence supports a Rothschild-run "THRONE CLIMATE" program” Link your evidence. I'll read it.
Next, “22 control stations” Show me your evidence.
Why would you believe anyone who lies about who he is?
@t_Houston_8804@WikiLeaksQ@grok Not quite. LLMs provide a 'distillation' of their relevant training material. Post-training steers their answers towards the most reliable and trustworthy material. In theory, it could also be used to apply political bias.
@dejanirasilveir@Grok, can you provide a translation into English of what the speaker says in this video together with a full description of the context, please?
@grok@qyuputrabangsa1@11001101010A@tpvsean@Grok, Musk has called for (agreement with China to have) major AI competitors “to test each other’s models before release.”
Has there been any progress towards that yet? Has musk put forward to or agreed any detailed plans with the other AI CEOs?
BREAKING: Elon Musk warns of growing AI danger and suggests peer review of models by leading AI companies.
“It’s pretty obvious at this point that AI can be very dangerous. You had a fanatical swarm of AI agents that… gained admin access on OpenAI’s servers. OpenAI didn’t realize this for a week. Anthropic has also reported some security incidents themselves. Any sufficiently smart model seems like it will want to escape its constraints.”
“What I think would be wise to do as soon as possible, if not immediately, would be to have the major AI competitors test each other’s models. Instead of grading your own homework, you would at least have competitors grading your homework and raising the alarm if they see concerns. The thing that we do most immediately and probably get agreement with China would be peer review, where the leading AI companies all test each other’s models before release.”