I made this rap freestyle for the love of @veefriends , what @garyvee is building is nothing short of incredible, I hope you love the rap @garyvee and I would love to be unboarded into the @veefriends family XD
Just secured @exitlabsdotfun WL spots for my community.
free mint
4444 supply
robinhood
Thanks to superdad @SolguruNFT for taking care of my community.
We are excited to announce our collaboration with @exitlabsdotfun a 4,444 office collection where the joke is the finance and founder roleplay
game.
Raffle and more details in DC soon
@Biggopp_ the fact that Mochi flagged its own gap instead of routing around it is the detail that makes me actually want to use it for something real. tools that know their limits are more useful than tools that pretend not to have any.
Watching the video, you'd think Mochi always knows what something means. My own conversation with it said otherwise.
I asked where it still gets tripped up. It told me straight: call a price feed "tight" and one validator might read that as within tolerance, another might read it as something else entirely, and it isn't fully sure yet which one wins.
@GenLayer, that's the part worth quoting, not the polish. I'd use Mochi to go find the one word in my own field that means something different to everyone outside it.
What's a word from your work that means one thing to you and something else to anyone outside it?
@Biggopp_ "feedback incorporated" in academic writing means I read your comments. it does not mean I agreed with them or changed anything. supervisors and students use that phrase to describe completely different states of the same document.
Two devs can stare at the same bug report and argue about whether it's even a bug, because they define "expected behavior" differently.
I asked Mochi if GenLayer's validators run into the same problem when a contract dispute gets described in two different ways.
They don't just compare words. The Equivalence Principle checks whether two answers mean the same thing, not whether they're phrased the same. "Send one-thousand dollars" and "transfer $1K" count as equivalent. Add one word, "send up to $1K", and it stops being equivalent, because that changes the actual obligation.
Then I asked where this still breaks. Mochi didn't dodge it.
Sarcasm is the honest gap. I gave it "sure, I'll just hand over a million dollars," and Mochi said the intent is obviously not to pay, but reading tone reliably is still a work in progress, not a solved case. Jargon is the other one: if one validator reads "the feed is tight" as finance-speak for within tolerance, and another reads it as something else, that's not sarcasm, it's ambiguity, and Mochi flagged it as a real unresolved edge case too.
That gap is the feature I want. /flag-the-line: when an equivalence call is this close, show me the exact two readings the validators weighed, not just the final yes or no.
Try it yourself: https://t.co/qMMKq1bExq
@GenLayer
What's a phrase from your own field that means one thing to you and something totally different to anyone outside it?
@cryptony0x pasted a sentence I was fairly confident about. got a 6. the word flagged was settles used as if the process were passive. Mochi said the network actively produces a verdict rather than arriving at one by elimination.
I gave Mochi one sentence about peer review disputes and asked it to grade me.
4 out of 10.
The word doing the damage: just. I had written that two reviewers applying the same rule differently is just a subjective disagreement, same as any other. Mochi said that word was hiding the actual work.
@GenLayer validators don't skip straight to a vote when reviewers disagree. They weight the evidence each side is standing on before anything settles. My sentence made that sound automatic. It isn't.
Paste your own one line take on how GenLayer settles a disagreement. I want to know which word gets flagged on yours.
Day 2 of tagging @pp_privatejet until I get a Tip from him
Stake - judah777
“Where there’s a will, there’s a way”
@pp_privatejet has thought us the real meaning of the word resilience
We are excited to collaborate with @3V3RYDAYP3OPL3 a reflection of the people who make Web3 what it is. Every character,
every trait and every piece of the lore is inspired by experiences that actually exist in this space.