@json_dirs Agreed with your points, and think we need to go further than misplaced rage: we need to actually organise. As you say, the problems in academia come from outside - rebuilding the eviscerated labour movement would solve many problems. For us, that begins in our workplaces in HE.
I think it is a tragic mindgame that for-profit industries have so destroyed public financing for education, in turn making academia a labor hellscape, that going to work for-profit has become a transgressive retreat to reality and humanity.
@LSHTM@IWGBunion@LSHTM's predominantly BAME and migrant cleaners and security officers are on far inferior pay, terms and conditions than their directly employed colleagues who work in the same buildings.👎🏻👎🏻
Our members will no longer accept this two tiered workforce!
@MrAkashTrivedi@PhDVoice@AcademicChatter@OpenAcademics Luck certainly plays some role, but let’s not ignore the whole host of pernicious factors at work. Race, class, accent, lack of psychopathic tendencies can all work against you: they’re beyond your control, but tell us far more about how broken and biased this system is than luck
@PhDVoice Once we thought academia was about solving problems that would improve the future of humanity and/or offer profound insight to enrich our lives. Having lived through the broken system that incentivises bad behaviour, we now want to burn it to the ground and worship the ashes.
@SwetaVijaykumar@PhDVoice@AcademicChatter@thephdstory 1. Well now that entire section makes no sense.
2. We do not need ~10 irrelevant citations to the supervisor’s previous work.
3. Never before has the comma been abused in such novel and creative ways.
“Adeyeye has not responded to requests to comment but stepped down from his role on the university’s bullying policy committee”
Oh lord.
https://t.co/9v0oFCgQUB
@PhDinGermany@PhDVoice "I was startled to learn that academic achievements were not always what mattered most."
Maybe 20 years ago this was surprising, but today?
Exclusive: The Science Museum has signed a gagging clause in its agreement with Shell International to sponsor its climate change exhibition, agreeing to take care not to say anything that could damage the company’s reputation, Channel 4 News has learnt.
@mitchmatheny@PhDVoice Thoughts: if the content of this documentary was surprising to you then you’ve been living under a rock and you’re part of the problem.