The post "9E6F=5996. Mind blown. $pDAI to $1. NFA." from @NineIronCapital is a cryptic and explosive on-chain revelation in the PulseChain community
It signals the final confirmation of a long-coordinated strategy behind pDAI's stabilization.
A true $1 peg would be transformative:
It would turn pDAI into a reliable decentralized USD on a fast, low-cost chain, unlocking lending, trading pairs, DeFi composability, and real utility.
Without it, pDAI remains a speculative, under-collateralized asset in practice.
๐ทThe Key Wallets and Their History:
On-chain sleuths (especially @NineIronCapital and others) have tracked clusters of "pioneer" wallets active since PulseChain's early days (2023):
๐น 9E6F:
`0xA30190b96FaEe0080144aA0B7645081Fcbf49E6F`
The most prominent.
In JuneโJuly 2023, it used large pAAVE holdings to seize governance control over pAAVE V2 (Aave fork) and pMKR (Maker fork) on PulseChain.
It forced votes, withdrew massive amounts of staked pAAVE, drained other assets (pLINK, pYFI, pUNI, pWBTC, etc.) from vaults via a contract (C7A9), halted pDAI-related inflation bugs, paused certain governance inflows, and transferred governance rights onward (e.g., to B22F and later 17F7).
Funds were often routed through Tornado Cash for privacy.
๐น B22F: Closely linked; received governance control from 9E6F and continued asset movements and draining actions.
๐น 5996: Previously viewed more suspiciously, associated with large pDAI minting episodes, potential "exploits," or aggressive contract deployments.
Some narratives labeled it negatively (e.g., "VietDong" or exploiter activity).
๐น Related wallets (e.g., 2822 linked by some to Richard Heart/RH ecosystem liquidity provision early on; 17F7 for potential future recapitalization).
These actions in 2023 looked, to many observers, like governance raids or extractive behavior on fledgling protocols.
๐ท The "Mind-Blowing" Revelation: 9E6F = 5996
@NineIronCapital announces on-chain proof directly linking 9E6F and 5996 as the same controller/team (or at minimum, tightly coordinated AKA. The Pioneers).
This isn't speculation; it's forensic connection via transaction history, contract deployments, and wallet interactions.
Why this is mind-blowing (layer by layer):
1โฃ. Unified Strategy Over Years:
What appeared as separate or even conflicting events (early governance takeovers in 2023 + later "cleanup"/debt management actions associated with 5996) are now confirmed as the work of the same actor(s). This spans 3+ years of deliberate, multi-phase execution.
2โฃ. Narrative Flip from "Exploit" to "Fix":
5996's actions (previously seen by some as harmful minting or extraction) are reframed as part of debt cleanup, pDAI burning in the PSM, raising deficits for flop auctions, and system recalibration.
The cluster has been actively preparing the conditions for proper stability mechanisms to function.
3โฃ. Sophisticated Coordination:
๐น Using pAAVE as a governance weapon to capture pMKR control.
๐น Targeted proxy upgrades (e.g., Aave V2 but not V3 - suggesting precise, intentional interventions for pDAI-related liquidity/lending).
๐น Privacy tools (Tornado Cash), multi-wallet architecture, and sequenced transfers.
๐น "Complete full circle" (as the 9i replied) implies a closed-loop, long-term plan where early "disruptive" moves enable later stabilization.
4โฃ. Strategic Depth ("Unbelievably Well Played"):
In a decentralized fork, pure community governance often fails due to low participation, apathy, or coordination problems.
Capturing and stewarding the admin/governance keys early allows the system to be fixed from within - halting bugs, managing bad debt, enabling auctions, and recapitalizing vaults so collateral can properly back pDAI.
This is far more effective than waiting for organic market forces alone.
5โฃ. Plausible Deniability + Optics:
By operating through opaque clusters and privacy mixers, the actors maintain separation from any single public identity while executing ecosystem-critical work. It fits narratives of "benevolent" or aligned stewardship rather than overt centralization.
This is peak crypto on-chain detective work, turning apparent chaos into a coherent, masterful strategy...
๐ท Analysis:
This is genuinely impressive detective work and reveals how complex forked DeFi systems actually evolve in practice.
Early-stage protocols rarely achieve perfect decentralization immediately; they often require active, sophisticated participants to bootstrap stability mechanisms, fix bugs, and manage transitions...
The confirmation that 9E6F/B22F/5996 form a coordinated cluster reframes past events positively for pDAI bulls: these weren't random exploits or hostile takeovers but purposeful interventions to make the stablecoin work.
It aligns with Dr Pegger's "canon thesis" narrative that key ecosystem players are committed to pDAI's success long-term.
That said, it does highlight real tensions around decentralization.
Control concentrated in a wallet cluster (even if "good" actors) means the system isn't purely permissionless or community-driven in its critical early phases.
If the intent remains aligned with peg stability and user benefit, this is net positive.
If it ever diverges, it could become a liability.
Crypto history shows both outcomes are possible.
๐ท Implications for pDAI:
Bullish case (most likely outcome per the narrative):
๐น Accelerated path to peg:
With confirmed control over key levers (governance of pMKR/pAAVE, PSM, auctions), the cluster can systematically burn excess pDAI, manage deficits/surpluses, enable proper liquidations, and recapitalize. This creates the conditions for arbitrage and market forces to enforce ~$1.
๐น Price potential:
From ~$0.0017 to $1 is a ~588x move.
Narrative momentum from this revelation could drive speculative inflows even before Full Peg.
๐น Ecosystem growth:
A working pDAI unlocks serious DeFi on PulseChain (lending markets, stable pairs, collateral use).
It strengthens PulseChain's position as a high-performance, censorship-resistant alternative.
๐น Multiple lines of defense:
Community discussions mention collateral (e.g., OA bags), pRSR-like mechanisms, and other backstops layered on top.
๐ท Risks/Caveats:
๐น Centralization perception:
Concentrated control could deter some users or attract regulatory scrutiny.
๐น Execution risk:
Mechanisms must work in practice; bad debt or failed auctions could delay or complicate things.
๐น Market dynamics:
Even with fixes, pDAI needs sufficient liquidity, demand, and arbitrage capital to hold the peg sustainably.
๐น Ongoing transparency:
Continued on-chain visibility (as with this revelation) builds trust; opacity could erode it.
๐ท Overall:
This development is a strong signal that pDAI's peg is being actively engineered rather than left to chance.
It significantly de-risks the "will it ever peg?" question for believers and positions pDAI as potentially one of the more interesting decentralized stablecoin experiments, a government-proof, immutable one on a forked high-performance chain, stewarded through its critical early phase by coordinated actors.
The "mind blown" reaction makes sense: it's the on-chain equivalent of realizing the chess grandmaster was playing 10 moves ahead the entire time.
Whether this leads to pDAI finally reaching and holding $1 remains to be seen in execution, but the pieces are aligning in a very deliberate way...
#pDAI $1
โค๏ธ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๐งก๐๐๐ฉต๐๐ฉท๐คโค๏ธ
๐ฟpDAI is mint-able...
The Mysterious L2
โ๐โ
โข PP = pDAI Protocol, Peg restoration system
โข L1 = PulseChain Mainnet
โข L2 = pARB, Gated, forked Optimistic Arbitrum rollup
โข pDAI (1) = pDAI on L1, Fixed Supply
โข pDAI (2) = pDAI on L2, Mint-able
โข aDAI (1) = Bridged aDAI on L1 (receipt/claim token)
โข aDAI (2) = aDAI on L2 from pAAVE
โโ
pDAI being mintable on L2 is one of the most important revelations to come out of the new PP architecture...
โ๏ธ pDAI (1) cannot be minted
โ ๏ธ pDAI (2) can be minted
This fundamentally changes how the PP works and how price discovery happens between the two layers.
โโ
โ๏ธWhy minting on L2 matters
With pDAI (2) being minted, new supply can enter the ecosystem through L2, allowing leveraged growth (via pAAVE) on L2, while pDAI (1) supply remains fixed.
The PP design ensures that value bridged to L1 creates buy pressure on the fixed pDAI (1) supply, rather than adding more supply to pDAI (1).
๐ New supply enters via L2, while pDAI (1) stays deflationary, as pDAI (1) supply can only be reduced
This is intentional.
The architecture deliberately moves minting and leveraged usage to L2, while protecting the core pDAI supply on L1.
โโ
๐Independence DAI
The price of pDAI (2) and pDAI (1) can move independently of each other, because pDAI (2) is created on L2 its market price is driven by L2 supply and demand, separate from L1.
๐ What this means is pDAI (2) can trade at a different price than pDAI (1).
When pDAI (2) trades at a premium to pDAI (1), arbitrageurs can*:
1๏ธโฃ Sell pDAI (2) on L2
2๏ธโฃ Bridge proceeds/value to L1
3๏ธโฃ Market Buy pDAI (1)
4๏ธโฃ Optionally rotate back into L2 to repeat the process
(*Basic version, reality will look alot more leverage-y, but this works for an example)
Although, this is not the main driver of buy pressure on pDAI (1). The main driver comes from using aDAI (1) for L1 liquidity pool seeding.
โโ
๐ฐSeeding L1 pools = Buy pressure on native pDAI (1)
When aDAI (2) is bridged to L1 via the pARB Gateway, it mints a corresponding aDAI (1) (claim/reciept token) on PulseChain L1.
(Underlying pDAI (2) that was supplied to pAAVE remains in the L2 lending market.)
This aDAI (1) is then used to seed liquidity pools on L1 (pDAI/aDAI pairs).
To seed these pools, actual pDAI (1) must be bought to pair with aDAI (1), and because pDAI (1) supply is fixed/deflationary, this increased buying activity creates buy real pressure on pDAI (1).
And the more value bridged from L2 to L1, the stronger the buy pressure becomes.
โโ
โ๏ธThe flywheel effect
TL;DR
1๏ธโฃ L2 pAAVE minting and leveraged looping
2๏ธโฃ Bridge value/proceeds to L1
3๏ธโฃ L1 liquidity seeding
4๏ธโฃ Buy pressure on fixed pDAI (1).
Over time, this mechanism aligns L2 and L1 prices through market forces even though pDAI (2) can be minted independently.
Have faith in the 1000IQ architects designing this โ their focus is stability, security and longevity, because...
Once pDAI is $1
pDAI stays $1.
2026 has been the great awakening for PulseChainโs forked protocols.
- Governance captured and exercised
- Oracles replaced
- Leverage loops building up debt
- Lending markets being staged
- Governance tokens being unlocked + repositioned
- Stray liquidity cleared
The question is becoming harder to ignore.
Has Richard been foiled by a Vietnamese kid and his pals?
Or are we about to see some deep fucking value.
Central & private banking dynamics delivered in a self sustaining decentralised masterpiece.
#pDAI to $1
#PulseChain season
WHO IS RICHARD HEART? ๐ต๏ธ
This video clip, โSTILL TWERKING,โ will answer that question.
If you want to join the PulseChain ecosystem and become part of the community, follow these steps:
1๏ธโฃ Buy USDC, USDT, DAI, or ETH on Ethereum, Solana, Base, BNB Chain, Polygon, Unichain, OP, or Arbitrum using platforms like @coinbase, @RobinhoodApp, @krakenfx, @zkp2p, or other trusted on/off ramps (many offer 0% fees).
2๏ธโฃ Transfer your assets to a self-custody wallet.
3๏ธโฃ Visit @LibertySwapFi to bridge or swap directly into PulseChain assets.
(If you experience gas issues or a stuck transaction, enable Gasless Mode, our protocol will cover gas fees and help resolve the transaction.)
$PCOCK to $10
โค๏ธ๐๐๐
๐จ JUST IN ๐จ
๐ฑ Day 1 Hexican Whale is currently buying DAI from PulseChain (known as pDAI).
What does he know?
Has he been fooled, or has he converted?
๐ Does he believe in the $1 Prophecy?
** Full Disclosure**
๐๐ป I am Long and would like my Altcoins to go up in Value by a lot, because that would mean my Purchasing Power has increased.
This would give me a Dopamine rise, and a sense of achievement.
This week, our product updates will significantly enhance Liberty.
For the first time, Liberty products will be adopted by major partners on Ethereum and other EVM-compatible chains, in addition to PulseChain.
The resulting free flow of capital through Liberty will be substantial. On-chain analysts will be able to see those movements, providing excellent visibility and serving as a powerful way to showcase both our products and PulseChain to the broader crypto industry.
@crypto_kripu@00xGuru@itzjoshuajake You'll look back on this post and cry in the future
This is not a drill kid - $pDAI is one of a kind
You might think you're smart - let's see how smart you really are once you've just missed out on a free 1,000x
If anyone wants to confirm for themselves with on-chain proof that pioneers are in control of pDai, simply paste this address into the Pulsechain explorer.
0x9759A6Ac90977b93B58547b4A71c78317f391A28
Then go to CONTRACT-READ-LIVE.
You will confirm it says 1.
pDai to $1 ๐ฅ