@NCA_UK i get the intent but im not sure this is legal as it amounts to an unwarranted search.
even if its by software your still scanning devices on the off chance.
of there could be something illegal on the phone.
yeah there could be something illegal in your pocket. without a warrant
@ShabanaMahmood oh please gaslight harder.
im seeing a story a week of a pedo being let go. the latest one claims to be a woman so the judge let him walk saying it would be to harsh to put him in a male prison.
its not about the kids its UNWARRANTED MASS SURVEILLANCE! and is illegal. echr 8-10
@LBC@jessphillips disingenuous argument claiming to protect the kids.
in reality its unwarranted mass surveillance. and no people wont just accept it.
oh i get the claimed intent.. but another pedophile was left to walk the streets again this week, after another was let go last week.
@iamheazz@satyanadella thats also kind of the point.
if its not up to it then they cant do it.
and no the data's no safer on a cloud host.
as soon as you upload it, its no longer yours or private, especially after you click delete.
@LBC@NickFerrariLBC if they print money they devalue the money already in circulation including the money we have in the bank.
they already wiped 20p off the value of the pound to cope with covid.
as a result the pound almost hit parity with the euro and dollar.
and undone the entirety of austerity
@CryptoMikli apparently she may be named in a case being brought against onlyfans.
apparently they are being sued because of girls bait and switch advertising.
if onlyfans loses and she is named.
that 100 million they (she and hubby) scammed could drain fast, as OF may sue her in return.
@CryptoMikli theres a difference between selling mystery and falsely advertising your content.
hers was bait and switch.
she advertised it as hardcore/real/uncensored.
what the customer got was not what was advertised.
instead they got softcore/faked/censored.
that's not mystery, its fraud.
@Togetherdec they know its not fit for purpose but are rolling it out anyway. knowing it will be hacked and is already likely hacked.
this is criminal disregard for data protections and laws on privacy.
@RealPostFolder no they would not.
she rejected him.
so would rather find someone who accepts them.
baby in tow or not.
its not that they want to spend there lives alone.
they just don't want to waste it being someones second choice when they can be someones priority.
@nettermike poor kid.
imagine if they kept the fellon in prison for 3 strikes and your out.
that kid wouldn't have to live the rest of his life, living with and knowing he killed a man.
@DarrenPlymouth lol he wants you to eat cancer.
thats how they grow the meat from a single cell.
they give the cell cancer so it constantly reproduces while its fed a bunch of chemical compounds.
compounds that need to be synthesized and the whole process is about 30 x more expensive than cows
@GBNEWS thats a breach of charter.
the nhs is free at the point of contact, its why we pay our taxes.
that kids parents also pay their taxes so it should also be free for them.
yeah i get they can pay.
but its for all. not just the poor.