Wilson Edwards

Grown up in Asia. expert of ChiNasies (the National Socialism of China). 我不反华，我只揭露中国的罪行。

[Wilson Edwards @hidefromKGB]

Everyday in China: Dehumanizing the Japanese and blatantly racist slogans. millions of Nazi comments calling for annihilation of another nation.
You now understand why the Chinese could do what they did to ppls like Uyghurs. They never saw the Japanese and other nation as humans.

[Wilson Edwards @hidefromKGB]

@ashen_one quite the opposite—they are among the few socially responsible companies in American history that have looked beyond own narrow interests.

Their focus extends beyond their own profits to the decades-long competition between democracy and authoritarian dictatorship.

[Wilson Edwards @hidefromKGB]

@TheAhmadOsman You should read the blog post of theirs carefully. They never said they wanted to make open-weight models illegal (nor do they have the authority to do so); they simply emphasized the importance of democratic nations prevailing over authoritarian countries in the AI race.

[Wilson Edwards @hidefromKGB]

@TheAhmadOsman No, quite the opposite—they are among the few socially responsible companies in American history that have looked beyond own narrow interests.

Their focus extends beyond their own profits to the decades-long competition between democracy and authoritarian dictatorship.

[Wilson Edwards @hidefromKGB]

@SamuelDominator @Yixiong_Hao @AndrewYNg @yacineMTB @Mononofu @JensenHuang Exposing hypocrisy of those companies' performance. Is it so hard to understand?

[Wilson Edwards @hidefromKGB]

@LiveMatrixCode @AndrewYNg @Mononofu @JensenHuang No, You should read the blog post of theirs carefully. They never said they wanted to make open-weight models illegal (nor do they have the authority to do so); they simply emphasized the importance of democratic nations prevailing over authoritarian countries in the AI race.

[Wilson Edwards @hidefromKGB]

@ItsTheDaybreak @AndrewYNg @Mononofu @JensenHuang You should read the blog post of theirs carefully. They never said they wanted to make open-weight models illegal (nor do they have the authority to do so); they simply emphasized the importance of democratic nations prevailing over authoritarian countries in the AI race.

[Wilson Edwards @hidefromKGB]

@ItsTheDaybreak @AndrewYNg @Mononofu @JensenHuang No, quite the opposite—they are among the few socially responsible companies in American history that have looked beyond their own narrow interests. Their focus extends beyond their own profits to the decades-long competition between democracy and authoritarianism.

[Wilson Edwards @hidefromKGB]

@zyjqrhm @JasonReynoldz @AndrewYNg @Mononofu @JensenHuang they are among the few socially responsible companies in American history that have looked beyond own narrow interests.

Their focus extends beyond their own profits to the decades-long competition between democracy and authoritarian dictatorship.

[Wilson Edwards @hidefromKGB]

@daniel_koss Stop lying. They have spent billions of dollars purchasing legitimate materials—such as content behind paywalls and books—to train AI, you fool. Chinese companies should spend their own money to purchase those compliant source materials for training.

[Wilson Edwards @hidefromKGB]

@redpillclear @DeeperThrill @AnthropicAI He is just a idiot. It's internet, the abyss of human ignorance.

[Wilson Edwards @hidefromKGB]

@DeeperThrill @AnthropicAI 别像个没见过世面的乡下人一样大惊小怪。这是多语言模型的常见现��。训练材料中包含中文材料也不等同于从竞争对手那里蒸馏。何况中国的模型训练时主要用的也是英语材料。

[Wilson Edwards @hidefromKGB]

@mhonkasalo No, You should read the blog post of theirs carefully. They never said they wanted to make open-weight models illegal (nor do they have the authority to do so); they simply emphasized the importance of democratic nations prevailing over authoritarian countries in the AI race.

[Wilson Edwards @hidefromKGB]

@realctalk1 @stevehou 你这个彻头彻尾的傻*。独裁政府在ai技术上领先并以此垄断世界是��人类文明最糟糕的结局。

[Wilson Edwards @hidefromKGB]

@ishaansehgal No, You should read the blog post of theirs carefully. They never said they wanted to make open-weight models illegal (nor do they have the authority to do so); they simply emphasized the importance of democratic nations prevailing over authoritarian countries in the AI race.

[Wilson Edwards @hidefromKGB]

@ishaansehgal No, they are among the few socially responsible companies in American history that have looked beyond own narrow interests.

Their focus extends beyond their own profits to the decades-long competition between democracy and authoritarian dictatorship.

[Wilson Edwards @hidefromKGB]

@QuixiAI @AnthropicAI No, they are among the few socially responsible companies in American history that have looked beyond own narrow interests.

Their focus extends beyond their own profits to the decades-long competition between democracy and authoritarian dictatorship.

So it's you who are 2 evil

[Wilson Edwards @hidefromKGB]

@Jesse_Livermore Because they are among the few socially responsible companies in American history that have looked beyond own narrow interests.

Their focus extends beyond their own profits to the decades-long competition between democracy and authoritarian dictatorship.

[Wilson Edwards @hidefromKGB]

@jacobandreou You should read the blog post of theirs carefully. They never said they wanted to make open-weight models illegal (nor do they have the authority to do so); they simply emphasized the importance of democratic nations prevailing over authoritarian countries in the AI race.

[Wilson Edwards @hidefromKGB]

@jacobandreou quite the opposite—they are among the few socially responsible companies in American history that have looked beyond own narrow interests.

Their focus extends beyond their own profits to the decades-long competition between democracy and authoritarian dictatorship.

[Wilson Edwards @hidefromKGB]

@jonathanChan007 @jacobandreou No, quite the opposite—they are among the few socially responsible companies in American history that have looked beyond own narrow interests.

Their focus extends beyond their own profits to the decades-long competition between democracy and authoritarian dictatorship.