Less protein, more lifespan!
A comprehensive review of the merits of protein restriction for healthy aging
A flip from the proteinmaxxing craze
"https://t.co/qJ5vcgq988
Join us in #NiagaraFalls for the @FASEBorg Nutritional Modulation of Inflammation and Immunity #NMII#NMI_SRC#NMII_SRC conference https://t.co/YnhmNRqKvt There is still time to register!
Nutritional Immunology Conference at Melbourne, Florida. Gorgeous location with beach view. Interested in Kennedy Space Center visit, 1 hr drive to the conference venue. @NutImmRIS#NIAL@FASEBorg . Registration is closing on June 18th, trainee awards will be available.
Get your MidSURE materials in!! Tomorrow is the LAST DAY change requests will be considered!
✅Tip: have your posters printed and ready!
#MSU#UndergradResearch#MSUevents#MidSURE2026
#inflammation#nutrition Want to learn more? Consider attending the Nutritional Modulation of Inflammation & Immunity @FASEBorg conference in early August. https://t.co/YK7zMlWRq7 There is still time to register!
Fermented foods lowered inflammation over 17 weeks. Adding more fiber did neither.
That's the finding from a Stanford randomized trial, and it should reframe how we think about feeding the gut.
Researchers assigned healthy adults to one of two microbiome-targeted diets, high-fiber or high-fermented-food, and ran deep immune and microbiome profiling across 17 weeks. The expectation going in was intuitive: fiber feeds your bacteria, so more of it should mean a healthier microbiome and lower inflammation.
That's not what happened.
The high-fiber group's inflammatory markers stayed flat. Its primary immune outcome, a composite cytokine response score, was unchanged from start to finish. And microbial diversity, one of the more reliable markers of gut resilience, held steady rather than rising.
The fermented-food group moved both. Inflammation declined steadily across the trial. Diversity climbed.
Fiber feeds bacteria the substrate they can digest. The study captured a signature of exactly this - i.e., the microbiome's glycan-degrading enzyme capacity rose while overall diversity stayed flat, consistent with the existing community upregulating rather than broadening
Fermented foods appear to do something structurally different. Live microbes plus the metabolic byproducts of fermentation seem to expand diversity directly, rather than by feeding what's already there. Greater diversity tracks with lower inflammatory load, and the fermented arm moved that lever while the fiber arm did not.
One detail worth sitting with: fiber wasn't inert for everyone. High-fiber consumers split into three distinct immune trajectories, and which one you landed in tracked your baseline microbiome diversity. Fiber's effect was contingent on the gut that received it. People starting with more diverse microbiomes likely respond differently than this average suggests.
Limitations:
Eighteen people per arm, healthy adults, 17 weeks. Inflammatory markers are intermediate biology, not clinical endpoints. Fiber's metabolic and cardiovascular benefits are established on separate, far larger evidence, and this trial doesn't touch them.
But for the specific job of moving the microbiome and inflammation, piling on more fiber wasn't the lever. The fermented foods, however, moved the needle.
Wastyk, Sonnenburg et al., Cell 2021.
Fermented foods lowered inflammation over 17 weeks. Adding more fiber did neither.
That's the finding from a Stanford randomized trial, and it should reframe how we think about feeding the gut.
Researchers assigned healthy adults to one of two microbiome-targeted diets, high-fiber or high-fermented-food, and ran deep immune and microbiome profiling across 17 weeks. The expectation going in was intuitive: fiber feeds your bacteria, so more of it should mean a healthier microbiome and lower inflammation.
That's not what happened.
The high-fiber group's inflammatory markers stayed flat. Its primary immune outcome, a composite cytokine response score, was unchanged from start to finish. And microbial diversity, one of the more reliable markers of gut resilience, held steady rather than rising.
The fermented-food group moved both. Inflammation declined steadily across the trial. Diversity climbed.
Fiber feeds bacteria the substrate they can digest. The study captured a signature of exactly this - i.e., the microbiome's glycan-degrading enzyme capacity rose while overall diversity stayed flat, consistent with the existing community upregulating rather than broadening
Fermented foods appear to do something structurally different. Live microbes plus the metabolic byproducts of fermentation seem to expand diversity directly, rather than by feeding what's already there. Greater diversity tracks with lower inflammatory load, and the fermented arm moved that lever while the fiber arm did not.
One detail worth sitting with: fiber wasn't inert for everyone. High-fiber consumers split into three distinct immune trajectories, and which one you landed in tracked your baseline microbiome diversity. Fiber's effect was contingent on the gut that received it. People starting with more diverse microbiomes likely respond differently than this average suggests.
Limitations:
Eighteen people per arm, healthy adults, 17 weeks. Inflammatory markers are intermediate biology, not clinical endpoints. Fiber's metabolic and cardiovascular benefits are established on separate, far larger evidence, and this trial doesn't touch them.
But for the specific job of moving the microbiome and inflammation, piling on more fiber wasn't the lever. The fermented foods, however, moved the needle.
Wastyk, Sonnenburg et al., Cell 2021.
Last month, Lyman Briggs College held our annual Research Showcase featuring undergraduate research in a wide range of disciplines. Thank you to all the participants and judges, and thanks to MSUFCU for sponsoring the monetary awards.
To read more, visit https://t.co/6FxqHQuhFb