@keenanrivals@TachyonZcash@keenanrivals I don't want encrypted money, I want encrypted Bitcoin. Same chain, same security, private balances. My take: this is how Bitcoin absorbs the best ideas.
@rahozel AI agents managing money with no middlemen? That's the real mindset shift. Financial rails built for machines, not gatekeepers. Watching this space closely. #TronEcoStar
@eternia_xx@axisrobotics Nine months from zero to 100k trajectories a day. The future's wild, and I'm here for it. Community-funded beats gatekeeper VC rounds any day. Why would anyone still bet on the old system?
@InvestmentGuru_ Not surprised one bit. Defense, satellite infra, and lunar tourism are where this sector is heading. The future's wild, and I'm here for it.
ZK, ZK, ZK, and more ZK.
Had the most interesting conversation with the legendary Shafi Goldwasser.
Watch, comment, share your thoughts.
(links to Spotify and Youtube in the next tweet)
Classic case of a headline outrunning the actual ruling. Bitcoin is property under English law, the court only said a physical-asset remedy doesn't apply. I'd trust the judgment over the headline any day.
This is really interesting (and a very nuanced legal point).
What the court DID NOT say: It did not rule that Bitcoin is not property. It is (and the legislation makes that clear. See the Property (Digital Assets) Act 2025 linked in the thread). A court cannot overrule legislation.
But remember – English law sees Bitcoin as INTANGIBLE property.
The specific cause of action in this case was called the tort of conversion. This is a technical civil ‘wrong’, that happens when one person intentionally interferes with another person’s property in a way that completely deprives the owner of its use or possession.
What happened in this case was that the seed phrase for the claimant’s @Trezor was accessed by his estranged wife, and she then swept his wallet. The tort of conversion MIGHT have enabled him to bring a claim against her for the lost property.
The kicker? The tort of conversion ONLY applies where a tangible, physical asset is involved. The law may over time evolve to change this, but at the moment, other causes of action must be used to bring his claim, such as unjust enrichment and proprietary restitution.
TLDR? The court did not say that Bitcoin wasn’t property. They said, correctly, that it is not PHYSICAL property, and that therefore the specific legal claim, and the specific legal remedy, sought by the complainant were not applicable in this case.
So the exploit came through Limit Break's payment processor, not Magic Eden itself. Old infrastructure strikes again. I'd revoke every approval I'm not using. This is why self-custody wins.
🚨UPDATE: @MAGICEDEN SAYS NO LIVE LISTINGS WERE AFFECTED BY THE NFT EXPLOIT. THE ISSUE INVOLVES LIMIT BREAK’S PAYMENT PROCESSOR V2, WHICH MAGIC EDEN STOPPED USING IN OCTOBER 2024; OLDER EVM LISTINGS MAY STILL BE AT RISK!!!🚨
Chainlink partnered with Infosys, whose financial services support 1.7 billion banking accounts globally, to standardize blockchain infrastructure for institutions.
The goal is to make institutional blockchain adoption more consistent and easier to deploy at scale.
$LINK at $13.06, up 20.3% over 7 days.
Is this the institutional breakout?
@keenanrivals@TachyonZcash If $BTC is only a SoV, privacy matters even more. You don't want your savings readable by anyone with a block explorer. Shielded Bitcoin keeps consensus untouched. My take: this is how Bitcoin absorbs the best ideas.
Dear @AlboMP learn from smarter people than you.
The government must enhance and advance its personal identifier storage architecture, create better federated identity for private consumption.
Less money helping your Union buddies and more money protecting Australians by updating very old and antequated systems.
🚨 عاجل: بلاك روك تتعاون مع أوندو لإطلاق محافظ استثمارية مرمّزة.
بلاك روك طوّرت 3 استراتيجيات محافظ لصالح أوندو، وأوندو أطلقتها كتوكنات استثمارية على البلوكشين.
توكن واحد ينطي المستثمر المؤهل تعرّضاً اقتصادياً لسلة أصول بدلاً من إدارة كل أصل وحده. الوصول مخصص للمؤهلين خارج أمريكا وفي الدول المسموح بيها؛ وبلاك روك لا تدير التوكنات أو تضمن أداءها.
Most robotics data claims stop at scale. The more useful question is whether the data improves a policy on an external benchmark.
That’s why the IROS 2026 result caught my attention: π0.5 plus AXIS improved from 83.9 to 88.8 on LIBERO Plus.
A bigger dataset is easy to announce. A measurable jump in task performance is harder to dismiss.
That’s the signal I’m watching from @axisrobotics #PhysicalAI
@bamitav@AlbertoEMachado A transparency report that hides the biggest incident isn't transparency, it's marketing. Why did it take a leak for us to hear about this? Companies can't grade their own homework on AI safety. #AIRegulation#AIGovernance
@EliBenSasson@Pooyahat 5 years out I think yes, but the ratio flips. Humans ask the right questions, AI grinds through the rest. The future's wild, and I'm here for it.
Last month I almost sent funds to an address that looked exactly like my exchange's deposit wallet, off by two characters buried in the middle. That's address poisoning: someone plants a look-alike string in your transaction history and waits for you to copy the wrong one out of habit. It's already cost people real money over nothing but character-matching.
@Americanfort_io built FortressName to remove the step that makes that attack possible. You send to @name instead of copying a string. Behind that name, the wallet computes a fresh one-time address for that specific payment, only you and the recipient can derive it, and only the recipient can spend from it. It settles normally on the native chain, but your FortressName itself doesn't publicly expose a fixed wallet, balance, or payment history. It's self-custodial the whole time, and it already works across 13 integrated networks, with a new one added roughly every two weeks.
Worth being clear: it's not anonymous. Your recipient still knows who paid them. It's private from everyone who isn't part of the transaction, not untraceable to them.
Would checking a name actually catch your attention faster than checking the first and last four characters of an address, or is that habit too deep to break?
Claim your free FortressName: https://t.co/IYEXymaRVw
UBS just dropped its 2026 housing bubble index 🏠📊
Zurich and Tokyo are in the red zone — the riskiest markets on the planet. Miami, Dubai, and Seoul are heating up too.
The good news for us: Toronto (0.63) and Vancouver (0.62) sit in the "moderate" zone — and both improved vs last year.
Full ranking in the image 👆
Is your city's housing market a bubble waiting to pop? 👇
Dubai has launched BT-AI Broker Terminal, an AI-powered platform combining property data, market insights and deals in one place.
The platform uses Dubai Land Department data to help investors, owners and brokers assess property values and market demand.
It also connects buyers with off-market and pre-market opportunities through RERA-registered brokers, while analysing Title Deeds and comparing properties with similar completed transactions.