@GraniRau Most critics would probably not mind if Christianity was made 80% European, but it’s not true to scripture then, and it won’t last in a post-Luther and Nietzsche world.
@GraniRau Nearly all defense of Christianity on here requires some distortion of the gospels like Renaissance Catholicism or the attempted NS program of Positive Christianity.
@BorealBaron Mind elaborating? The positive aspects of Catholicism allowing for the Renaissance/Crusaders are not inherent to scripture, they are due to tacked on European virtues.
Protestantism is closest to the core of Christianity, which is what people (like Nietzsche) criticize.
@uk_archipedia@innnspace@BorealBaron Is that an insult? Europeans are the most efficiently violent people on Earth in general, and the most rugged among them migrated to America.
@BorealBaron Positive Christianity is nice but unfortunately Protestantism is the most accurate reading of the gospels. People want to turn back Christianity into what it was before Luther revealed it to the people, but it isn’t possible. Luther paved the way for Nietzsche.
@thltd_@n00rdung The positives of Medieval Christianity were only possible due to the average person having little understanding of actual scripture, if they had they would act more like modern Christians - not to mention Catholicism incorporated European virtues into Christianity.
@HeinrichPoster Why are they calling the people who don’t endorse hip hop and degenerate behavior “wignats”
I don’t think they know the meaning of the term