I will not be lectured about sexism and misogyny by these women. I will not.
The public will not be lectured about sexism and misogyny by these women—not now, not ever.
Women can be banned from (formerly) women only spaces but if can a man who claims to be woman from a woman only space, you’re going to the High Court.
Like… FFS.
Supreme Court appeal hearing complete.
Decision could be weeks or months, who knows.
It was a day and half of legal argument about the facts and points of law we believe the ruling judge got wrong.
It was all quite complex and detailed but ultimately
the outcome will determine if it really is vilification to refer to these males as men/blokes/fellas even though that is what they are.
It was also about the “damages” amounting to $95k and how that was determined. We also need clarification about the contradictory orders to not post their names but to also pin a post to all socials that name them.
Additionally the NSW attorney general’s office sent a barrister who argued that males who wish they were women need protection from people like me who hurt their feelings. He said there should be no implied freedom of political communication if it hurts their feelings even though I am registered political campaigner. We argued people and organisations need proof of policy failure if we are to enact change.
There was absolutely no regard for the feelings of women who are forced to have these men in our spaces, services or sport.
The only reason why trans activists would oppose the accurate definition of “woman” in law is because destroying women’s legal rights & protections is the point.