@NikkiHaley Nikki, just drop out of the race already, you're a disgrace to not just republicans/conservatives, but to EVERYONE. Nobody wants you, even your posts are FAKED.
@h00737062@sweetdreams If controllers were the better input, then it wouldn't need software aim assist, now would it? It's a horrible input that needs assistance to be competitive. Imagine only being "as good as others" because a software is helping you aim, hahaha... that must feel so shit
@imaginecurve As a Curve Black customer, I'd rather see 3 retailers with 2% each (or even 1.5% each), than 6 retailers with 1% each. Or instead something like .75% cashback on all purchases...
@plutus Who came up with this post? Was it Head of Marketing Alex Jolly? He's known for these type of customer insults. Imagine taking away customer cards, then making them pay 10€ after like half a year of not having a card at all, then blaming customers for not wanting to pay the fee.
@MaxxMogul@DavidPersson_B@DDhopn Basically, Danial doesn't seem to understand economics very well. He constantly makes changes that are just hurting the project. If he would have done NOTHING, we would be at a better place. Or if he would have just reduced free tier, that would have done a lot.
@MaxxMogul@DavidPersson_B@DDhopn Don't get me wrong, I like Plutus (I've been a customer for 1.5 years or so) and still have a stack. But some of the comparisons the CEO makes are just outlandish. And with the changes he made (first DA, now 1k reward cap), he is only hurting loyal customers/reducing PLU value.
@MaxxMogul@DavidPersson_B@DDhopn You don't magically increase demand for PLU by just increasing stacking requirements. Whoever put that imaginary thought in your head is an idiot. Go back to economics school. If you increase price for a product = demand goes down. So. Fucking. Simple.
@MaxxMogul@DavidPersson_B@DDhopn No, the DA was horrible, simple economics. If you increase price of a product without increasing the value/benefit of product, then the value proposition becomes worse = less demand = PLU price goes down = emissions go up = sustainability shortens. The proof is in the charts btw
@andybash12@DDhopn@gozolove123@PlutusFans By doing 1 of those 2 things (or even both), you basically just decrease demand for the product (because it becomes less attractive). Less demand for PLU = lower PLU price = more emissions = lower sustainability. All of this is so simple, but Danial seems to not get it.
@andybash12@DDhopn@gozolove123@PlutusFans It would be so simple if Danial understood basic economics. Higher demand for product = higher PLU price = less emissions = longer sustainability. However, he keeps either 1) increasing price of product without increasing benefit of product and/or 2) lowering benefit of product.
@DDhopn @NonyaBisnis5 @eggofghost@gozolove123@PlutusFans The revert of the DA was good (= "lowering of price"), but by introducing reward caps for stackers you also severely nerfed/lowered the benefits/ROI of the product, meaning once again: less demand for the product = lower PLU price. I mean cmon Danial, this is basic economics.
@DDhopn @NonyaBisnis5 @eggofghost@gozolove123@PlutusFans If you want PLU price to go up (= less emissions/more sustainability), then you want to increase attractiveness of the product. You do this by 1) lowering the price it costs and/or 2) increasing the benefit of the product. However, your new plans are not doing this either.
@DDhopn@Jasperctay@plutus You made the product unnecessarily complex/non-transparent. The customer will punish you for this by just going to a competitor that is more transparent/easier to calculate the ROI for them. Less hassle, less "what if's", etc. Congrats, you played urself (and ur loyal stackers).
@DDhopn@Jasperctay@plutus I can't calculate the cost of the redeem because I dont know what PLU will be valued when I buy it, by the time I receive my cashback 2 months later, etc. I also don't know how much I'll spend, if I can use up my "redeemed extra cap" every month or not, etc... too many variables.