robinhood:0x15d36b6a28d8327abc7afabf0f106ae2c9af5c4d 真正在赚钱的不是产品��是交易税。 pons
v2 平台页面显示:$PARE 设有 2.00% 创建者税,
83.703033 ETH Earned by PARE across 502 sweeps」≈ $208,087, 且PARE pays its creator fees to 0x854D…7022」——进创建者钱包,不进协议金库。
If you are new to $STANDARD
Here is probably the easiest way to understand the entire ecosystem from zero:
The Standard Reserve is basically an attempt to build an onchain central bank directly on Robinhood Chain.
There is an entire monetary system built around it:
- STANDARD
- Bank Charters
- Branches
- Dynamic emissions
- ETH reserves
- Buybacks
- Burns
- Protocol-owned liquidity
But everything starts with STANDARD.
The easiest way to think about it is:
STANDARD = the liquid currency
Charters = the right to operate a bank
Branches = the units that actually earn emissions
And this distinction is important.
Simply holding STANDARD does NOT generate yield.
You need a Charter and active Branches to participate in emissions.
There were originally 1,000 Genesis Charters.
Each Charter starts with one Branch and can eventually operate up to 10.
Now here is where the system gets interesting.
The protocol currently has a base emission of: 700,000 STANDARD per day.
But that number is not fixed.
The Standard Reserve watches how much ETH is actually entering and leaving the main ETH/STANDARD pool.
Basically:
More ETH entering = expansion
More ETH leaving = contraction
During expansion, the emission multiplier can increase and protocol fees are used to build reserves, including tokenized gold and protocol-owned liquidity.
During contraction, emissions fall and ETH from the Contraction Vault is used to buy STANDARD from the market and burn it.
So the protocol is constantly reacting to its own economy.
But there is another burn mechanism:
Branches.
If a bank wants another Branch, it has to buy a license using STANDARD.
100% of the STANDARD used for that license is burned.
The first Branch auction already sold all 100 available licenses.
Opening: 12,000 STANDARD
And closing: 11,888 STANDARD per Branch.
So expanding your bank literally removes STANDARD from the supply.
Basically the system becomes increasingly expensive to leave when everyone tries to leave at once.
Now let’s understand the reserves.
When capital is flowing into STANDARD, 70% of protocol fees are directed toward the Expansion Vault.
The protocol can use those funds to accumulate hard reserves such as tokenized gold and build protocol-owned liquidity.
When capital starts flowing out
Those fees instead feed the Contraction Vault.
The Contraction Vault buys STANDARD from the market
And burns it.
This entire experiment depends on whether the protocol can accumulate reserves and destroy enough STANDARD to offset the emissions being created by bankers.
Because if capital keeps entering
Branches keep getting purchased
Reserves keep growing
And burns keep absorbing supply
The system can become extremely interesting.
But if ETH starts leaving faster than the contraction mechanisms can react
The exact same reflexivity can work in reverse.
So if you want to follow STANDARD
There are basically four things I would watch:
- Net ETH flow
- STANDARD emissions vs permanent burns
- Growth of protocol reserves
- Demand for new Branches
i made a simple explainer video that explains all you need to know about @standard_rsv, with @0xbeans as your guide
if you've been too lazy to read & understand the whitepaper, watch this instead to know why you should pay more attention
00:00 - What Is Standard Reserve?
02:22 - Policy & Capital Flow
03:54 - Bankers, Charters & Branches
06:10 - Exits & Resolution Fee
08:14 - The Experimental Design
@Starcap_xyz The model looks clean: 2.5% tax → assets ��� buybacks. But at current size it still feels like a volume-driven token with a space story attached. Buying real launch capacity needs serious capital, contracts, and customers — none of which a trading tax automatically provides.