@Dylan28904944@MsSuh104 I agree. Extreme occurrences like this one that involve groups like the KKK will only cause more and more problems giving the president less and less support and trust. #SuhAPLang#APLangDiscussion
@usmc12202 @MsSuh104 I agree. The only reason that the tone changed so dramatically is that the media forced the change to happen from the bashing of the President’a actions. Even with free speech, sometimes it goes overboard. #SuhAPLang#APLangDiscussion
@MsSuh104 3. Mr. Soros’s proposal is to shun political figures who could bring about political demonization and get rid of them. I don’t agree with this because I don’t think it’d work as the “right person for the job” could be shunned out of the position. #SuhAPLang#APLangDiscussion
@MsSuh104 2. I don’t really believe that there is a new political demonization because both political parties have had these extreme events occur and radicals will always come from disagreement. #SuhAPLang#APLangDiscussion
@MsSuh104 1. The tone of politics has completely changed with the election of President Trump as politics have become based more on negative media and outside information than ever before. #SuhAPLang#APLangDiscussion
@ksides1029 @APSteinhauser This enormous number just emphasizes how big of a problem it is in our country and that we need to figure out a better, more consistent system. #SuhAPLang#APLangDiscussion
@usmc12202 @MsSuh104 Although I disagree with sanctuary cities, if they are to continue I agree with this idea bc a relationship with the immigrant just leads to confusion and instability which can only hurt the process. #SuhAPLang#APLangDiscussion
@lukeredmore @MsSuh104 I partially agree. In the end, the rules and laws need to be constant and steady without room for leeway to ensure a stable status of immigrants. #SuhAPLang#APLangDiscussion
@MsSuh104 3. If there’s one thing I would change, it is that I would totally get rid of them because, although immigrants are needed in our country, these cities lack the order and law that immigrants came here for. #SuhAPLang#APLangDiscussion
@MsSuh104 2. The benefits of sanctuary cities are that they can protect illegals from federal immigration laws and give them a good relationship with law enforcement. The drawbacks are that they harbor criminals and prevent local police from doing their job. #SuhAPLang#APLangDiscussion
@MsSuh104 1. The most interesting fact I learned is that police officers can legally ignore ICE’s request to keep illegal immigrants in jail for an extra 48 hours. #SuhAPLang#APLangDiscussion
@TomoyoshiKimur1@MsSuh104 I agree that it technically is “possible” but we don’t live in a perfect world where people will agree and where there are no extremists for any given subject, so these problems will continue to occur. #SuhAPLang#APLangDiscussion
@Beryllium0xide Though this might be true, the problem here isn’t that people in power hate certain people as they’re not the ones starting mass displays of violence, it’s every day people that are. #SuhAPLang#APLangDiscussion
@lukeredmore @MsSuh104 Even though some of us might be “open-minded,” it only takes a very small percent of people to take extreme, fatal action. Even if most people are for peace, you can’t make an entire population agree with you. #SuhAPLang#APLangDiscussion
@MsSuh104 4. I don’t believe my generation will be able to prevent this hatred as it will only be magnified through social media and the publicity of each crime will only create a snowball effect of more hate. #SuhAPLang#APLangDiscussion
@MsSuh104 2. I don’t believe my community is safe from hate-related crimes because no where in our country is now. My community is just as likely to have a similar event happen as anywhere else in the country. It’s a nationwide epidemic. #SuhAPLang#APLangDiscussion
@usmc12202 @MsSuh104 I agree. The use of anchor babies has become a serious issue and a common trick used by illegal immigrants. Changing this law would potentially eliminate this loophole completely. #SuhAPLang#APLangDiscussion
@Dcstranger @APSteinhauser I agree. Being that birthright citizenship was originally put in place over a century ago to allow African Americans born in the U.S. to be citizens, Trump would need to go through a grueling process that probably wouldn’t even work out. #SuhAPLang#APLangDiscussion
@MsSuh104 2. Birthright citizenship exists in the first place as a result of the Fourteenth Amendment. It was originally put in place to override the issue of African Americans not receiving citizenship when they were born in America. #SuhAPLang#APLangDiscussion