@AngusTaylorMP A 3 bed house shouldn't cost any more than 500,000 anywhere. Until you have a plan to put Australian families in those homes for that price, I dint give a single fuck my guy.
@TMFScottP They can't blame the tax changes, their property would be grandfathered in so could still claim the old benefits. It's just convenient to blame them
@ShitpostRock2 Bro banished a couple for eating my guy...literally took two people and put them out on their ass and decided they should carry burdens and suffering for generations because they ate....
@workercouncil_p *sigh* it's almost like people FORGET why we paid taxes in the first place. It's to fund social and public services, which could and SHOULD include basic food rights. In other words....farmers would get paid by taxes...
@luceishere_ On the flip side, some people aren't willing to grind a few hours to lose the gear in pvp in seconds to someone with hundreds of hours in the game and I get that too
@luceishere_ That's kind of the whole point I was making. If I'm there for pvp, I'm not there for gear. But people with 30 hours in the game should have a way to get decent gear quick to engage in meaningful pvp. People will complain no matter what, they already do
@luceishere_ I think, splitting it like that is exactly how you get a skewed and divided player base. People will be pvp OR pve and there will be no in between. I'm not even sure how you would cheese it between the modes. The whole point would be to build a good character in pve to pvp with
@luceishere_ From the people I spoke to, pve would be there way to "rebuild" or relax after a few bad runs, gather some better gear and go back to normal play. They seemed happier wity the idea of taking actual gear, rather than free load outs if a pve option to recover existed.
@luceishere_ I'm a pvp player anyway, so no. But I can acknowledge that a pve mode wouldn't detract from my experience, so I don't understand people being so vocally opposed to it. I actually think it would be a net benefit