What does “native liquidity layer” mean? Pact’s smart contracts live on each chain. Any dApp calls them like built-in functions. No adapters, no bridges. Uniswap’s composability, now chain-agnostic.#Pact_Swap
@Pact_Swap What does “native liquidity layer” mean? Pact’s smart contracts live on each chain. Any dApp calls them like built-in functions. No adapters, no bridges. Uniswap’s composability, now chain-agnostic.
Uniswap became infrastructure.
Not because it was the best swap UI.
Because dApps could build on top of it.
Pact brings that concept further.
→ Fully deployed as smart contracts.
→ Composable across all supported chains.
Any dApp can use Pact as its native liquidity layer.
The biggest risk in DeFi is trusting custodians. wBTC is that risk. Pact removes it entirely with native cross‑chain swaps. Your Bitcoin stays your Bitcoin.#Pact_Swap
@Pact_Swap The biggest risk in DeFi is trusting custodians. wBTC is that risk. Pact removes it entirely with native cross‑chain swaps. Your Bitcoin stays your Bitcoin.
Quick check: open your wallet.
What are you holding more of?
BTC? or wBTC?
wBTC is an IOU issued by a custodian.
If the custodian fails, your IOU fails.
On Pact, you swap for the actual coin.
Native. Across chains.
One of those is Bitcoin. The other’s just a promise.
Most protocols add security on top of the swap.
Pact builds it into the swap itself.
The collateral is locked before the trade settles. The outcome is enforced by the contract.
Nobody decides because the code already did.
That's the difference.