PSSSSST…did you catch one of the team on a MEGA @LiquidNftMarket Spotlight talking about the fact that EACH APE comes with a utility worth between $5000 and $8000??
Details coming next week…
There’s only a handful of cab skins in the @LiquidApeNFTs collection and two of them have landed already 👀
Show us your ape!!
Going public will make FORTs safety stack a de facto standard for buyers, shifting pressure onto low-cost robot vendors to certify or lose contracts. That raises compliance costs for manufacturers and speeds consolidation in industrial automation.
https://t.co/WvVTDFIZHj
She kept paying her loan. The system called her a defaulter anyway.
In Kenya, teacher Christine Masinde was repaying a bank loan through salary deductions. In 2014, a banking error got her wrongly listed as a defaulter.
She discovered it when another bank refused her a loan.
The mistake was eventually corrected. In 2016, a court awarded her KSh200,000 in damages.
One bank got its records wrong. Another treated those records as truth.
Watching @GenLayer's film, I thought of Lee Castleton. A faulty computer system reported shortfalls he never caused, yet he ended up facing £321,000 in legal costs.
Now imagine AI agents making millions of deals daily.
A purchasing agent wrongly marks a restaurant's invoice unpaid. A supplier agent stops deliveries. A credit agent cuts its limit. By the time someone checks the original receipt, the restaurant has lost a day's business.
Every agent followed the information it received. The information was wrong.
THAT'S HOW ONE MISTAKE BECOMES TEN.
@GenLayer proposes a different approach: independent AI validators review evidence, reach a collective verdict in minutes, and allow appeals.
But speed matters for another reason. Correcting the record means little if the damage has already spread.
Here's my question: Should AI agents be allowed to act on disputed claims before an independent verdict is reached?
#JusticeNeedsAnUpgrade
Some projects try to manufacture a community. Others already have one.
That’s what makes @LooksmaxMe interesting. $LOOKSMAX is backed by a real community that was here before the token.
Follow @LooksmaxMe.
🏆 WHAT'S AT STAKE?
Guru Token status brings 2 weeks of platform payment utility, more visibility and potential creator revenue sharing.
Still building your token? Grow your community and work toward Raydium migration to qualify for future cycles.
🔥 24 HOURS LEFT TO MAKE THE TOP 10.
GuruFun Open Voting starts OCT 24.
Already migrated to Raydium? Nominate your token now and rally your community's BGB votes.
Only the TOP 10 advance.
No nomination. No place in the race.
🚀 https://t.co/6F9hLCsuZg
🇵🇰 EXCLUSIVE: IMRAN KHAN'S SONS SAY THE PAKISTANI GOVERNMENT IS TRYING TO KILL THEIR FATHER!
I spoke again with Qasim and Sulaiman Khan, and this conversation was the most heartbreaking.
Not only is their father, the former Prime Minister of Pakistan, still in solitary confinement, but his three courageous sisters, Aleema, Uzma and Noreen, have now also been arrested
And when @PTIofficial supporters hit the streets, many were arrested, beaten, and even killed!
Imran Khan’s sons say they haven't spoken to their father in over 6 months, nobody has seen him for 2 months, and they're increasingly worried about his deteriorating health.
I asked them the hardest question of all: Do they still believe they’ll ever see their father again?
Qasim admitted, he has very little hope, but they will never stop fighting
I told them both I wouldn't give up hope.
And I meant it.
@Kasim_Khan_1999
Paste a coin, reverse engineer its stack and launch a alternated unique fork.
This month “Reverse Engineer Anything” became the fastest-growing repo on GitHub: 365,000 stars and 91,000 forks in six months, one MCP that lets an agent take any program apart, down to the binary. We asked a smaller question: can you reverse engineer a coin? A coin has no binary. What it has is a website, a story, and a pattern it copied from the coin before it.
What exists
Every coin leaves a record outside its chart: its website, its scripts, its pumpfun description, its X bio, and when the site dies, the Internet Archive’s copy. REA’s rule is that a finding without evidence is not a finding. Behind that, our own corpus: 62 studies of agent and launchpad coins and 192 named patterns drawn from them.
We built REVERSEPAD
Paste a contract address and the coin is taken apart in about a minute into a DNA card: what it claims, how it says it, what the site is made of, what is real and what is implied. Then three alternated forks: new coins built on the source’s shape, never its name, ticker or pictures. A fork gets a full site with its own generated art in about thirty seconds and launches on https://t.co/MwoM6XuKRx from your own Phantom.
How a fork gets launched
Paste the address. Read the card. Pick a fork or edit it into your own twist. Open its site. Approve once in Phantom. The coin is live with its site in the description and “Forked from” pointing back at the source.
https://t.co/fjuipOXWMQ
No ghosts. No monsters. Just six words every trader fears. 🎃
Think you can write them? Enter Six-word crypto horror for a chance at rewards.
📅 24 Oct, 10:00 UTC - 4 Nov, 10:00 UTC
Register: https://t.co/z1JRWa9M09
#ToobitHalloween
Four new listings. $55,000 in rewards to explore. 👀
Celebrate CT, ATF, DRV and XDP with deposit rewards, a spot competition and CTUSDT futures trading rewards.
Register and join 👇
https://t.co/kggRNJg00C
#Toobit#NewListings
IDK if this is going to be worth it.
I was looking through the recent @BlackRock filing for PBIT, a proposed Bitcoin ETF.
The trade-off: your gains would be capped in exchange for seeking to limit your losses when Bitcoin falls.
Imagine you invest $1,000:
• BTC falls 30%: $700 in BTC vs. $900 if the fund loses 10%.
• BTC rises 50%: $1,500 in BTC vs. $1,200 if the fund gains 20%.
This is essentially what they are trying to do, and although it's still in the works.
I’m wondering: is this something people would want?