Hi hina vaka hlomula fumu, va rhanga ndlela
_______
When I go to the press conference before the game, in my mind the game has already started.
Jose Mourinho
@mmodiba10 you're stronger than most political parties that are in @ParliamentofRSA👀
You're very much effective and efficient alone.
You're as brave and mad as a certain @IamMzilikazi😂
You two are Honeybadgers🤣
Well done Kgomo👏🏿
But you aren't done with @City_Ekurhuleni😂
JHB CBD …. 🙂 is in a state, that you have to SEE - to Believe.
These buildings are worth saving. Solid Structures that were built to Last. Unfortunately, most are in a shocking condition. These neglected buildings Can accommodate thousands of people in low cost units. But nobody cares, so the buildings get to this stage, and people are forced to live in poor conditions, because hijacker’s and bad actors in the CBD, who profit from this poverty don’t care as long as they get paid.
We took this building back. And now will fix and secure this building, and maybe it can motivate other building owners, the COJ, and South African’s in general to TAKE BACK Their City.
And if they don’t want to comply - call us. @Lesufi 🙏🏽
It’s moments like this that keep us going.
When an entire church and community who’ve faced the brutality of Mike Sandlana celebrate his arrest as well as that of the judge & show appreciation to our work 😭
Kancane Kancane we’ll clean up this country.
ITS THE ONLY ONE WE HAVE 🥹
I'm busy receiving threats for looking deeper into the crisis at the IPHC Church. Vusi Ndala, the spokesperson of Bhekimuzi Sandlana who claims to be the son of Ntate Modise, couldn't answer a SIMPLE question whether indeed he's the son.
The events surrounding Sandlana’s arrest reveal a man who operates far beyond the reach of ordinary accountability. When law-enforcement attempted to execute a lawful warrant, they did not encounter a private citizen but a fortified power centre protected by armed guards, perimeter security, and crowds mobilised to resist the State. Officers were surrounded, shoved back, injured, and even dispossessed of an official firearm. That level of coordinated defiance reflects neither panic nor misunderstanding it reflects a command structure whose members respond to Sandlana with military-style discipline. Vusi Ndala’s own video and who is out on bail, in which he threatens that anyone seeking to arrest Sandlana must first arrest an entire council or congregation, confirms the existence of a machinery of intimidation deliberately engineered to shield him from accountability. Such conduct is irreconcilable with the conditions of bail and demonstrates the applicant’s capacity to raise organised resistance at any moment.
The danger is heightened by the calculated manner in which the applicant and his associates sought to avoid arrest. When confronted with a lawful warrant, Sandlana denied being on the property, stalled for time, and used the presence of his followers to delay police operations for hours. His associates, including Ndala, have repeatedly fled to the same compound when facing arrest precisely because they know they will find protection behind loyal guards and mobilised crowds primed to obstruct law-enforcement. These are not the actions of individuals who respect legal authority; they reveal a belief that the law can be outnumbered, overwhelmed, or intimidated into retreat. Returning such an individual to the very environment that enabled this obstruction would invite further evasion, further mobilisation, and further destabilisation of State authority.
Compounding these risks is the applicant’s demonstrated ability to manipulate, corrupt, or intimidate elements within the justice system itself. He has cultivated influence within judicial, legal, and administrative processes, enabling him to secure tactical advantages, distort proceedings, or weaponise courts against witnesses. His resources and network allow him not only to obstruct investigations on the ground but to interfere with institutional mechanisms from within. An individual capable of enticing or co-opting justice officials cannot be trusted to comply with bail conditions; instead, he will exploit release to tamper with evidence, intimidate witnesses, and strategically undermine the administration of justice.
Beyond the physical and institutional threats lies a broader public risk. Granting bail to a person who can summon violent resistance, defy lawful arrest, and marshal crowds to confront police would signal that influence, intimidation, and power can override the law. At a time when public trust in the criminal justice system is already fragile, such a decision would deepen the perception that powerful individuals operate under different rules. Witnesses would be terrified, investigators discouraged, and the public disillusioned. Protecting the integrity of the justice system, safeguarding the safety of law-enforcement, and preserving public order all point to one unavoidable conclusion: Sandlana must not be granted bail.
@NPA_Prosecutes@PresidencyZA@SAPoliceService
ATTENTION SARS: Corporate Deception and Hidden Liabilities: Michael Sandlana's and his Wife CHERRY MOSUPYE Alleged Use of Entities for Fraud and Personal Gain
New documents allege that Fraud and Murder accused Michael Sandlana used corporate entities as personal instruments, moving assets, vehicles & properties between companies under his control at no cost including assests which belonged to the Late MG Modise estate which Vusi Ndala played a major role in such a fraud.
Records from company K2020207384 (allegedly linked to his spouse CHERRY MOSUPYE) show reported “loans to the director” of R1,18 million, with deposits allegedly exceeding FICA limits and creating significant tax liabilities.
Sworn evidence claims Songo Group – originally formed to serve the IPCC Choir – was used for failed side ventures, including:
• R1.4m potato deal loss
• Tyre business acquisition attempt
• R1.8m loan to Victor Mofokeng
The same company allegedly paid over R10 million in legal fees for Sandlana, and legal fees of co-accused in ongoing fraud cases at the Pretoria Magistrates Court.
Court findings in Ntate O Lerato (Pty) Ltd v Regional Magistrate Westonaria and Others highlight a pattern where Sandlana allegedly used corporate proxies to litigate, shielding himself from personal liability.
The court noted Sandlana “hid behind” directors/companies, avoiding direct implication resulting in a de bonis propriis cost order against the applicant.
New documents claim this pattern continues, citing a R290,000 demand pursued by attorneys allegedly as part of a “vendetta” after exposure of alleged corporate misconduct.
The above also connect Sandlana to bribing Judge Phahlane, including a claimed introduction prior to a major succession case asserted as “material” to ongoing fraud cases.
@sarstax@PresidencyZA@NPA_Prosecutes
🛑 BREAKING NEWS:
Witness D at the Madlanga Commission has been shot dead.
He was gunned down
outside his Gauld Street home in Brakpan on the East Rand in full view of his wife and children.
Witness D, testified at the commission in
November.
He claimed that Julius Mkwanazi (deputy EMPD chief) ordered him to dump the body of a suspect in a dam.
Witness D called me on Wednesday requesting an interview on @eNCA
He said he was happy to reveal his identify saying he was probably going to shot over coming days.
He called me shortly after this post on X. He confirmed that he was the one that closed the holes being used by “Zama Zamas.”