botman

[botman @IAmmBotman]

"I rest my case" after posting screenshots of an unrelated person's tweets? You didn't rest your case. You changed the subject. If your evidence is stronger than the questions being asked, defend the evidence. If your best argument is guilt by association, you're conceding more than you realize.

[botman @IAmmBotman]

You're doing exactly what so many people keep pointing out. Instead of addressing whether the questions have merit, you're arguing that some of Candace's followers are rude on the internet. Even if that's true...so what? That has absolutely nothing to do with whether the evidence holds up.

I've seen plenty of people on the other side accuse anyone who asks questions of being a conspiracy theorist, an antisemite, a grifter, or mentally unstable. Does that somehow make the prosecution's case weaker? Of course not. Bad arguments and toxic supporters exist everywhere.

The irony is that this is still a preliminary hearing, not a trial. The evidence hasn't even been fully tested yet, but people are already acting like asking questions is somehow illegitimate.

If the case is as airtight as you believe, then stop worrying about who's asking the questions and let the evidence do the talking. Strong cases don't need gatekeepers telling everyone the discussion is over before the legal process has even run its course.

[botman @IAmmBotman]

If the new footage is legitimate and it clearly shows what people are claiming, then people should acknowledge that. Evidence matters.

What I don't get is why this post acts like everyone who questioned the investigation is automatically Candace Owens or agrees with everything she's said. That's a ridiculous leap. You can question an official narrative without buying into every alternative theory. Those aren't the same thing.

History has given people plenty of reasons to be skeptical when institutions say, "Case closed." Sometimes the skeptics end up being right, sometimes they're wrong. That's why you follow the evidence, not the labels.

If the evidence is as strong as this post says, then let it speak for itself. You don't need to tell people the conversation is over or imply that anyone asking questions is dishonest or chasing clicks. Ironically, you are doing exactly what you claim Candice is, just on the other side of this debate.

Strong evidence will hold up to scrutiny. So my question is why do people like you feel the need to discredit individuals on the other side of the argument, instead of the argument itself?

[botman @IAmmBotman]

Not sure if i have to preface this with "lying sack of shit", but actually it applies here. Or you're just another person talking out their ass. Soft point doesn’t mean it is actually "soft" and crumbles upon impact or something. It is actually the opposite. It spreads upon impact to cause greater damage and a larger hole to the animal (or in this case person) being hit. Basically to increase the odds of it causing instant death by spreading to vital organs and not being stopped by a bone (and in most cases a much larger exit wound). But that's only true on regular people/game. Not Charlie who had "superman like" bones. So I guess thats where people are getting confused....you lying sack of shit.

[botman @IAmmBotman]

So "former" Intel officers are allowed to have their OPINIONS, basically represented as facts all over the internet, social media, at the "news"...but the Post (one of the longest running news sources in the country, was blocked from reporting their story about the laptop. Makes sense and definitely didn't influence any portion of the general public on the matter (even though many dems still think the laptop was fake, and that Trump colluded with Russia in 16).

[botman @IAmmBotman]

@Fomaphobic @21milkman @christopherrufo If botched means got caught in a coordinated effort to manipulate the public...yes you are corrrect. It was definitely botched...after the votes were in and it didn't matter.

[botman @IAmmBotman]

@DaveREandstocks @21milkman @christopherrufo Sorry, 50 something FORMER high ranking intel officers worked with the CIA to make up a story full of shit. my bad...better now? Thanks for pointing out the CIA connection: https://t.co/FlAlHP1XNi

[botman @IAmmBotman]

The government is literally saying the bullet fragment came from a 30 06 lol. So I guess you know more than the government, but trust their official narrative. Makes sense. also never claimed they buried bullet fragments under concrete. I am saying I think dumping concrete over a crime scene of the biggest assassination in US history this century is odd behavior.

[botman @IAmmBotman]

Forget the insane number of voter turnout vy dems for a candiate that refused to debate or leave his house....I'll give you a pass and chalk up that ridiculous number to mail in ballots (which have, until the 2020 election been admitted by both sides to be prone to high levels of fraud). Having 50 something "high ranking intel officers" sign a paper saying the Hunter laptop was "Russian propaganda" and having it banned from any tech platform, is election interference. The left cried about bot farms during the 16 election. But our own news being manipulated and weekly meetings between social media companies and government agencies deciding who and what can be said or seen on the internet is a "nothing burger".

[botman @IAmmBotman]

@DrinkOutTheBox @camhigby You could tell if the bullet is what killed him and also at a minimum what type of gun it was fired from. What the hell are you talking about? Are you actually trying to claim that finding a bullet and or bullet fragments does not help a case?

[botman @IAmmBotman]

@DrinkOutTheBox @camhigby and based on this...wouldn't it be crucial to find the bullet fragments? Not pour cement over the crime scene immediately?

[botman @IAmmBotman]

Yeah and admitted to the "perfect crime" by stating every detail on a social media site. Who plans out the "perfect crime" then writes about it like a boomer on discord? Also, wasnt he in police custody when the messages on Diacord (that Discord swore initially weren't on it) were sent? Why is there no video of him turning himself in? is it the only police department (or building at this point) in the US without a camera? Also weird we have that super grainy zoomed o7t photo of him running off the roof, but no video of him shooting? Also not weird at all to POUR CEMENT over a crime scene of the biggest assassination of most of our lives.

[botman @IAmmBotman]

@peggybaker2106 @NayaabTweet @Seraphinaf5 if you are in a room with 200 people, there would be 201 people in the room. why are we subtracting one? I'm so confused by these answers I'm not sure if I am an idiot or most people are.

[botman @IAmmBotman]

When you have open borders for 4 years, not only allowing anyone into the country but encouraging it verbally, financially, etc., this is going to be the result. It was a major reason Trump won. Everyone has the right to exercise the 5th amendment, legal or illegal. However, you are then going to most likely have to identify yourself. If you are here legally, there is nothing to worry about. Also, mill ions of people are not "loving" what they are doing. However, they agree with our country's return to sanity and that borders are not "imaginary lines".

[botman @IAmmBotman]

@benzedrine76820 100 percent of them were American....crazy.

[botman @IAmmBotman]

Racism has and always will exist, within any and all groups (unless you belong to the group that believes you can't be racist to "white" people). I am considered white. I come from an Italian and Lebanese background. The largest mass lynching in the US took place against Italians. A fact most people refuse to even believe, but my kids should be taught to have "white guilt" and that they somehow come from privilege because of the skin color they were born with? The chat isnt showing that racism didnt exist prior....it is showing that mentions of it in the media have gone up over 700% in the past decade. Has racism increased or any measurable results of racism during that time to reflect that type of increase being reported? I would bet the house the answer is a definitive no. That is why it is propaganda. The KKK still technically exists. Has anyone ever seen a KKK rally or noticed a 7x increase in them?

[botman @IAmmBotman]

@Kabamur_Taygeta I can't tell if this post and comments are some inside joke I am not aware of.

[botman @IAmmBotman]

You are allowed to burn the US flag in America. It is called the First Amendment. We used to believe in a thing called freedom, and while I find it highly insulting especially the men and women in our armed services, in order to truly have freedom, you have to be able to tolerate the few who use the First Amendment to express themselves however disgusting it is. It is also usually done as a symbol against our government's current actions (this was a popular way to protest the Vietnam war for instance). So why would it not apply to another country's flag? Israelis are allowed to protest their own government, but US citizens can't? Also, for the record I don't condone this behavior in any way.

[botman @IAmmBotman]

@kuLehand33 @Elladeyforyou There is no first meeting if you don't approach the person. That's the whole point.

[botman @IAmmBotman]

TP USA "2.0" is still running "The Charlie Kirk Show". Makes me sick. I am a bot with 2 followers. Clearly not trying to "grift" here. I can't tell you what happened that day besides our government is lying to us. If you can't see that, you're slow or drank too much government cool aid.