So mistress being told "that chair is mine" is humiliation but she isnt allowed to cry over actual humiliation such as taking a mistress? 1+1=fish with yall
@Kacangwalnut@fromavalon45656@starryskynikki That’s the point.
In my view, Rashta didn’t deserve to be whipped or killer, and Kosair (along with the other guy) didn’t deserve to die.
Rashta should have faced a fine or a few years in prison, while Kosair and the Count should have been imprisoned for attempted murder.
@OtetOzneroEsaso@_Tia__56 So, that explains why you can’t grasp complex lines of reasoning and why you like Rashta.
You’d love a world where being born on the fringes gave you the right to hurt anyone you please.
@Kacangwalnut@fromavalon45656@starryskynikki Have you read the story?
It wasn't Navier who ordered her brother to investigate or destroy the evidence; he acted on his own initiative.
Even if he had been caught, Sovieshu could never have killed the heir to a dukedom, he says as much himself.
@OtetOzneroEsaso@_Tia__56 So, you admit that your judgment is total crap.
Rashta was a slave and was manipulated, but that didn’t give her the right to hurt Navier, Tiana, and everyone else she harmed.
You’re a communist, I bet?
@Kacangwalnut@fromavalon45656@starryskynikki He has been exiled.
Even after Rashta’s time is over, he will not be able to inherit the Trovi duchy, and his children will be barred from inheriting the throne which will instead pass to Navier’s children.
That seems like a sufficient punishment to me.
@OtetOzneroEsaso@_Tia__56 Both flogging and the death penalty were unjust punishments, yet all you see is "poor Rashta, she was a slave, so she gets a free pass."
@OtetOzneroEsaso@_Tia__56 Have you read the webtoon?
Pregnancy would change the sentence to death, that was the problem.
You all act so virtuous, yet you’d be perfectly fine with the guy being executed while Rashta faces no punishment at all even though She ruined someone's life.
@Kacangwalnut@fromavalon45656@starryskynikki In fact, I never said he was innocent.
I only said that Rashta ruined another person’s life just to clean up her own image and despite this, she remained unpunished.
Rashta’s fans invent and twist many things, but the point is actually quite simple.
Navier never acted against Rashta; it was Sovieshu who kept asking her for favors on behalf of his mistress.
This was inconceivable even if the concubine was noble.
#TheRemarriedEmpress
@fromavalon45656@_Tia__56 So, if there are rumors circulating about someone, and I take advantage of that (ruining that person in the process) am I innocent, and does the blame lie with the person herself because of the rumors that were circulating about her?
@_Tia__56 Navier did not ask for Rashta to be punished, she asked that the man’s life be spared and that he be sent into exile.
When Sovieshu start to made a fuss, Navier reminded him that, according to the law, Rashta ought to be punished. How can you claim that Navier is being unfair?
@_Tia__56 Floggings are as unjust as the death penalty, but Navier’s line of reasoning is: "You are sentencing the man to death, so Rashta, too, must receive the maximum penalty under the law."
Was it right, in your view, for the man to pay with his life, while Rashta went unpunished?
@_Tia__56 Navier, who only took action after Tiana begged her to, simply requested that the man be exiled rather than executed.
As for the brother, she tried to stop him and it wasn't as if she saved him, given that he was the heir of a duke.
Sovieshu simply couldn't execute him.
@_Tia__56 So, slavery is wrong, but the death penalty isn't?
Navier was expected to accept Rashta into the palace which went AGAINST the law while also accepting that, ACCORDING to the law, her brother (or that other guy who didn't even know Rashta was pregnant) should be put to death.