Reminds me of the story of some Chinese celebrity who suddenly found her social credit score had gone to zero, and had her accounts and everything locked.
Her crime: multiple Jaywalking offences.
BUT
Not only hadn’t she done so, she was doing it all over the country simultaneously.
Turned out the facial recognition cameras were picking up her face from bus advertisements.
So every time a bus went through an intersection, there she was <cough>jaywalking<cough>
Can’t remember how long it took for her to get that Orwellian tale resolved.
My biggest issue with this is that without sound financial education, the majority of these kids will either have it stolen by a relative at some point, get themselves swindled by deceptive practices and scams somewhere, or most likely will use it to buy a toy (eg boat or muscle car).
Growing up, some kids in the neighborhood were FA-ing with a 30-30 to see who could load and ready it the fastest.
At the FO it discharged into one of the kid’s chest at ~1-2yd (they were inside).
Fortunately for the kid standing behind him, it didn’t exit wnd just bounced around inside the chest.
Bullets can do weird things.
“Woke Right” is a very stupid term.
It requires too much unpacking for a normie, and just makes you sound like you want to call someone a n4zi.
psyOp Right is a far better term for people like Candy and her merry band of bots.
When MAGA was on a roll and should have united after Charlie, the psyOp Right rolled in with its mission to derail that momentum.
Sadly far too many took the bait.
@ZiaYusufUK@TRobinsonNewEra The answer to any country that refuses to repatriate its criminal citizens is simple:
C-130, parachute*, and a yeet over said country.
*parachute is optional.
Years ago I knew a girl who worked at Yellowstone for a summer.
She told a story of how some parents thought it’d make a really good photo op to smear honey on their kid’s face and have a bear lick it off.
The rangers then had spend the next couple of weeks trying to determine which bear now associated honey with the taste of human after it ate the kid’s face.
I believe the kid survived, but was extremely disfigured.
Time to thin the herd I guess.
@camhigby I’m ok with datacenters. Just put them on unused land like Detroit instead of farm land.
They already have the infrastructure, and in many cases the land can already be too poisoned for other uses.
Why ruin good farmland?
It’s difficult to have a relationship when the other party has specific teachings and principles that not only allows but ENCOURAGES its followers to lie to you.
My starting position is everything is taqiyya when dealing with muslims.
Unless it’s the most obvious prima facie reading of an islamic text, they’re lying.
I like Sam, but the other guy has really taken to heart the phrase:
Baffle them with Bullshit!
It was a painful 3hrs.
Sam makes terse point.
Dude: I’ll answer that! blah blah blah blah blah de blah bl…
Sam: STOP PREACHING and answer the question. Or;
That’s not what I’m asking, my question is…
I have a suggestion for a new Dilemma, granted it needs to be fleshed out but here are the bones:
The Islamic Dilemma - Honesty variant
Compare how islam makes allowances and actively encourages lies and deceit especially through taqiyya.
Both from allah being the “best of all deceivers”, and Momo not having to honour a promise to his wives to not bang slave girls in their beds because allah hadn’t told him to make such a commitment.
With Joshua 9 and the treaty with the Gibeonites without consulting with The Lord first.
Despite this disobedience to neither fulfill the command to clear the land of the current inhabitants or consult with God first the Israelites are directed to honour the treaty.
So the question is:
If God’s nature is unchanging and the karen [intentional] follows on from the tradition of the previous scriptures, one would expect to see this consistency from age to age.
First God requires the Israelites to honour an unsanctioned treaty.
Now we have a god who tells us we can reneg on agreements at will if allah either hasn’t sanctioned them or they are disadvantageous.
What changed?
God goes from holding honesty and standing upon one’s word,
ie Joshua 9
“let your yes be yes, and your no be no.”
“…no deceit was found in his mouth.”
“Be holy for I am holy.”
Being highly valued by God himself.
To
Considering the deceiving people and his creation a major flex, and then encouraging his followers to do like wise.
So either
• Momo knew nothing about what was in the previous scriptures.
• What they have is an ‘abrogation’, or our scriptures <cough>corrupted<cough>.
If they want to go with abrogation or corruption, THIS is the hill they intend to defend?
As I said it needs a bit of fleshing out.
@Joeinblack@firasmodad This was part of my reading today:
22 Blessed are you when people hate you, when they exclude you and insult you and reject your name as evil, because of the Son of Man.
– Luke 6:22
Let's be clear. The Communist Control Act is still on the books although it is essentially a dead letter at this point. But there was a time such things were taken seriously and actually enforced by our security agencies. And so they should again.
The DSA is a Marxist revolutionary organization and should be disqualified from office in the United States, full stop. Any question about what they believe and what their goals are can be cleared up with their own words about the destruction of the West and America, not to mention their utterly insane social theories. People need to take this very seriously. Go watch some videos from the DSA conventions over the past couple of years. It's actually shocking that these lunatics are now steering a major party in the United States.
I really recommend everyone follow Stu Smith of the Manhattan Institute (@thestustustudio), nobody has chronicled and archived the DSA better. It's all there. And it's insane.
Darializa herself should not be seated in the House because of her own personal support for the destruction of the West and this country. Speaker Johnson should take up the issue based on grave concerns regarding her potential fidelity to to the oath of office. I've said this multiple times now.
There is a real question on the table here -- does the oath of office actually mean something, or is it just boilerplate? If the oath is a meaningful component of qualifying for elected office, then it's very difficult to see how any DSA member can hold office in good faith.
It's really that simple. And it needs to be litigated sooner rather than later.
Once again -- the Constitution is not a suicide pact. We are under no obligation to enable revolutionaries who openly hate our nation and welcome them into our government as valid good-faith political actors.
To the contrary; a functional society has every obligation to stop them before they gain power.
Marxist revolutions only end one way. And we have a very limited window to stop them.