@BrockOtten@Blackhawks8823 Not exactly true. CBA 8.4 (iv) that you are thinking of pertains specifically to a player that "has not been selected in a previous Entry Draft". Pridham has.
@NHLPlayerSafety Guy was literally fined less than two weeks ago for high-sticking, and you couldn't bother to pick up the phone and fine him $13,020.83? Again, less than TWO weeks ago!
@CoryCwihula@FriedgeHNIC Two game misconducts for boarding and a fine for diving, just this week. Rantanen is speedrunning the "most hated player" game
@OffbrandOoc@NHLPlayerSafety Exactly. So they COULD go higher. $5,000 is NOT the max. They just have to offer a telephone call.
They publicize "Maximum allowable" as if their hands are tied, but offering hearings is literally their job.
@NickZ2317@NHLPlayerSafety Read it clearly. They can fine more than $5000. All they have to do is make a phone call and offer the player a hearing (aka do their job). They say "maximum allowable" as if there is nothing more than can do.
@sherm_3 @LiamHildebrand2 It's the League's fault for not taking player safety seriously. So many hits and cheap shots that could've/should've been stopped before they happened
@NHLPlayerSafety It is incredible how disingenuous your guys are. "$5,000, the maximum allowable under the CBA" despite fining more than $5k literally 3 days ago.
Stop lying to cover the fact that Parros doesn't want to be bothered to do his job.
@AGM012345 @nyyplswin @AGM012345 Implying you could have won if you had selected someone else is 1) sounds like a Team USA problem, tbh 2) Kind of a silly argument when you were facing a team that had enough snubs to ice two or more competitive teams in the tournament.