@NewHexican@RichardHeartWin@Hexologist31 Don’t be. I get mad but didn’t sell a single coin. He’s been way and price was going up and to the right, why post about the price and jinx it for the 1000 time?
@RichardHeartWin@Hexologist31 This won’t go anywhere. Since you posted the hex chart only down. Yesterday 99% of users couldn’t use the bridge but let’s brag about the one chart that’s doing ok.
Pretty dumb Mr Genius.
A note for services using public RPCs:
More requests and larger batches are rarely necessary for blockchain applications.
A bit of client-side optimization usually produces better results — on any RPC, not just one endpoint.
Every request is broadcast across a decentralized network. That creates extra CPU, memory, and context-switching work for every node involved — the opposite of efficiency.
Generous free limits exist to reward thoughtful design. Good behavior tends to be treated well.
What blockchain developers and people who love PulseChain should do:
1. Control your own destiny — host your own RPC
https://t.co/y3WwsBqONP
2. Select known reliable public RPCs as fallbacks if your own node fails.
3. Prioritize official over community RPCs.
https://t.co/CxJhFlYjnB
Trust is a huge factor.
Question why anyone hosts a free public RPC.
Whoever sees your transaction first gets the first shot at sandwiching it — or can simply choose not to forward it.
You don’t control the software they run or any modifications. You’re trusting them with your transaction.
Blockchain devs: RPC latency is a terrible way to pick your endpoint.
Why it's a weak signal:
→ Block times are ~10s. Shaving 11ms won't get your tx included any sooner.
→ TLS handshake is one-time. With keep-alives you pay it once.
What actually matters:
→ Fresh heads — no stale data
→ Accurate GPO — reliable gas estimates
→ Reliability under real load — not just acing health checks
The fastest RPC on your probe can still serve stale heads and fail real requests.
Be kind to your users.