@4evercontrarian@grok @MilaLovesJoe Wait, so you asked Grok to prove her wrong and Grok said “yeah, in essence she is basically right.” You seem to be nitpicking small details and calling the entire claim garbage as a result.
@LizzieMarbach@AbbyJohnson Additionally, Candice’s entire video was about telling people not to speak for him when it’s not correctly portraying his views.
@LizzieMarbach@AbbyJohnson Who would know more about Charlie’s private journey - his personal friends or strangers who only see his public statements? Do you realize that Candice Owen’s was close friends with him? Refuting to a friend of his by citing his public statements makes no sense. Friends no more.
@larryjones Absolutely. That kind of evil vile behavior is not acceptable in society. Get it out!
Disagreeing with his views is fine (though not very respectful right after) or even criticizing him as a person. But not celebrating and mocking his assassination like we’ve seen.
@swinhulu@MaileOnX@FilmLadd I honestly don’t understand why some on the left have a hard time distinguishing the two types of behavior. One is valid, the other is reprehensible and not okay.
@swinhulu@MaileOnX@FilmLadd Right - and no one is targeting you (shouldn’t be). What IS being targeted is when you laugh, celebrate and/or call for more of it. This has no place in society.
Have you been fired? I doubt it. Because voicing your disagreement is not what the right are upset about.
@brycecasket@TruthHurts2223@lisa_liberal “I want abyone who disagrees with me and holds these views murdered, and that is a good thing to do.” I would have hoped that the majority who view THAT on both sides would react with “yeah that’s crazy and terrible”. But the left didn’t.
@brycecasket@TruthHurts2223@lisa_liberal All the clips being asserted by the left to show him as a terrible person… only the left will agree with you on that. That’s the problem. These aren’t clips that the majority on both sides would say “oh yeah, he is terrible”.
Now if someone were to say something like “i beli
@DoranLex@FeserEdward Your comment adds zero value. An utterance - a digital puff of wind and nothing more. One cannot even conclude why you think his post is nonsense - it is too vague. Expand, please.
@allenanalysis Trump’s tariffs were to equalize the playing field. And this is the response? I don’t think they understand: Trump will give them something to think about soon.
@vasilina_orlova@Acyn Zelenskyy has continuously cancelled elections. Yes, that’s pretty much the definition of a dictator. Staying in power without the ability of the people to have a say in who governs.
@ruthbenghiat The law is authoritarian in that breaking the law brings punishment. That’s how a society ruled by law and order works… sillly twist of perspective you’ve done. This is not novel under Trump.
@FredJoh26842729@NewYorkStateAG@AGWilliamTong In contrast, if the MAJORITY of a group - congressmen - have net worth’s inordinate to their income, that indeed is suspicious. Not simply a few.
@FredJoh26842729@NewYorkStateAG@AGWilliamTong Not really. Most average income earners will have a few homes at most. That’s not going to make them worth $80 million, or $150 million. A few million at most if in a high home value state riding an appreciation cycle. DOGE isn’t THAT stupid.