@Dlion_Dwolf@Arinzeoreva @Oluwadaniel_0 A dog is a different species than a man. No one is arguing about different species. The argument is about headcount. If you have two individual dogs, you have two dogs, not one dog.
@Dlion_Dwolf@Arinzeoreva @Oluwadaniel_0 Human being" in your example is used as a species category, not an individual. Eve is not a lesser nature than Adam, but she is still a separate individual entity. If you have two separate entities, you have two beings.
@Dlion_Dwolf@Arinzeoreva @Oluwadaniel_0 Look at the text you just quoted. God created "HIM" (singular) because "Man" (Adam) here refers to the human race / human nature in the abstract. But immediately, the text says He created "THEM" (plural) because they are two separate, individual persons.
@Dlion_Dwolf@Arinzeoreva @Oluwadaniel_0 all 8 billion people on Earth are literally "one and the same human being," then when you eat, my stomach gets full. When one person dies, we all die. That is completely absurd.
@Dlion_Dwolf@Arinzeoreva @Oluwadaniel_0 Hebrews 1:6-9 explicitly states that the anointing happens "when He brings the Firstborn into the world." The anointing is tied directly to His entry into human history as the Messiah, not to eternity past . His "companions"are humans, proving this is about His human mission.
@Dlion_Dwolf@Arinzeoreva @Oluwadaniel_0 You asked if Solomon could command Zadok without David's order. No, because David was the current King. But that proves order and authority, not a difference in human nature. David, Solomon, and Zadok all shared the exact same 100% human nature.
@Dlion_Dwolf@Arinzeoreva @Oluwadaniel_0 He was the King of Israel. In Israel's hierarchy, the King held the supreme political and military power over the entire nation, including the priests. King Solomon later deposed Abiathar the High Priest and replaced him (1 Kings 2:27). A lesser person cannot fire a greater perso
@Dlion_Dwolf@Arinzeoreva @Oluwadaniel_0 You are the one spinning the word of God by forcing the word "begotten" onto a text that clearly describes a physical removal and construction.
@Dlion_Dwolf@Arinzeoreva @Oluwadaniel_0 Taken out" means part of Adam's physical body was taken and fashioned into a woman (Genesis 2:22 says God built the rib into a woman).
@Dlion_Dwolf@Arinzeoreva @Oluwadaniel_0 Bro, I literally showed you how this leads to this conclusion. Being and nature are the same thing. Person and Being are not the same thing.
@Dlion_Dwolf@Arinzeoreva @Oluwadaniel_0 By stating the Son has "life in Himself" just as the Father does, Jesus is claiming to possess the exact same uncreated divine essence
@Dlion_Dwolf@Arinzeoreva @Oluwadaniel_0 The verse says the Father gave this to the Son. But how can you give "uncreated, eternal life" to someone? You cannot give eternity to a creature, because a creature has a beginning. Therefore, this "giving" is eternal it describes how the Father eternally generates the Son.
@Dlion_Dwolf@Arinzeoreva @Oluwadaniel_0 If you have two separate, distinct entities, your headcount is two. You cannot have two distinct entities and call them "one being" in the singular sense.
@Dlion_Dwolf@Arinzeoreva @Oluwadaniel_0 You are confusing "Being" (what exists as an individual) with "Nature" (what kind of thing it is). Adam and Eve are two individual beings who share one human nature. If they were literally "one being," Eve wouldn't have been able to sin independently while Adam watched.