Kelsen believed his "pure theory" accomplished what Marx sought, the law as norm not being tantamount to the law as just, hence not guilty of ideological distortion of reality but expressive of a specific "object of cognition without any moral connotation."
The Cambridge Handbook of AI and Technologies in Courts by Monika Zalnieriute - @mzalnieriute and Agne Limante
A global interdisciplinary Handbook examining how courts are using AI, balancing efficiency with protecting justice and the rule of law.
📚 https://t.co/Qboh14McdS
#commerciallaw
Joseph Raz thoughtfully reflected that "'the law' is a concept used by people to understand themselves," hence that "a major task of legal theory is to advance our understanding of society by helping us understand how people understand themselves."
TERKINI🟡: Surat Peguam mewakili Undang Yang Empat Kepada Ketua Polis Negeri Sembilan — Bantahan Rasmi Terhadap Insiden Pada 5 Jun 2026, Pembetulan Kenyataan Media Sosial Serta Status Perkembangan Siasatan Laporan-Laporan Polis Terhadap Raja Norazli Bin Raja Nordin
Newman on the purpose of a university.
In The Idea of a University, John Henry
Newman argues that education is not
mere job training.
A university should train the mind to
see things whole.
Theology, reason, knowledge, and truth
belong together.
"A University training… aims at raising the
intellectual tone of society, at cultivating
the public mind."
tolle lege
How should courts address const. amendments in the absence of robust procedures to prevent misuse of constituent powers? Can a Dworkinian framework buttress the effort and, if so, how? In this Reply, @IssiZvi and I seek an answer, now live at @icon_journal https://t.co/szwE5x8cDk
Pembubaran DUN N Sembilan mungkin tak sah?
#BHnasional Isu penurunan takhta Tuanku Muhriz dan pemasyhuran Tunku Nadzaruddin Tuanku Ja'afar sebagai Yang di-Pertuan Besar yang baharu mempunyai kesan undang-undang perlembagaan yang amat serius
https://t.co/ioKqlA4i3x
“Any matters related to the appointment of a ruler belong to state matters,” he said, pointing to Article 71 of the Federal Constitution, which guarantees and protects the rights of rulers and ruling chiefs.
He emphasised that disputes involving the appointment of the Yang di-Pertuan Besar must be resolved according to the state constitution, and that the federal government is constitutionally obliged to respect decisions made by the state’s ruling chiefs.