Tankfish is a Roblox YouTuber with over 1 million subscribers, who since 2020 has been implicated in multiple EPI incidents and problems. I uploaded a video today covering these, and I will be posting more here.
Thread below:
1. you are a literal pedophile (evidence linked below for those curious). Friendly fire will not be tolerated.
2. being told by people something is happening is completely different than being shown evidence, and in a community where false allegations are rampant (see parlo) evidence is key. Schlep has not worked with Ace since November of 2025.
Are you going so hard against Schlep because you’re worried you’ll be the next person caught in one of his stings?
https://t.co/9LxYv2jLBS
If you think lolicon is a problem, then you should take issue with violence in video games!
Fictional violence and pornographic material are not the same. It's a false equivalence. The fictional violence you commit isn't real. It stays in the game world. Your attraction to images of children is in your brain.
Violence is also rarely the thing that makes games fun. It's an aesthetic, but still dominates games because the ability to blow things up without consequence is something you can do in games, not in the real world.
What actually makes games fun to play is the way they respond to your actions, the goals they set for you, the skinner box reward/punishment schedules in them.
You could remove the aesthetic of violence, blood, and death from Call of Duty by turning it into a game about airsoft, and it would remain mostly as fun.
Google Earth is the biggest open world "game" out there. You can go almost anywhere in the world, but all you can do is look around. Nobody plays google earth for a 100 hours like Skyrim.
It's not a game. There are no external rewards for exploration. There's only the intrinsic reward of what you find and see, which isn't enough to motivate people to explore for hours.
If they introduced restrictions: You can't fly everywhere, you need to find a road to location X, or explore an area and find objects hidden in the streetview, it would instantly become an actual "game".
If you had a game where you can commit endless, realistic, visceral violence without any rewards, it would just be a novelty without any staying power.
I would absolutely take issue with people who gain sadistic pleasure or get erect while playing a violent game, but I heavily doubt the experience of gunning down characters in a video game is enough to satisfy a sadistic pleasure.
There is a way to achieve sadistic pleasure in games: trolling and griefing in multiplayer, but that's you harassing, insulting, and bullying real people, not NPCs. If someone invested hours to build a house in Minecraft and you pour lava all over it, you're destroying that investment of another real person's time. That's why they get upset, even though "it's just a game".
You can train a neural network to play and beat video games, but you can't really teach it to get aroused by lolicon art. That's because that arousal and attraction is a reaction in your brain, not in the bitmap or piece of paper. It's a part of who you are.
It's in the real world, not in a game program, and normal people find it very disturbing that you have that reaction in response to that stimuli.
You might think:
"if this was a real child, I wouldn't be turned on by this!"
"I just jack off to lolicon pictures that used a petite adult woman that looks like a child as reference and drew them as even more child looking!"
"I wouldn't be comfortable with knowing a real child was harmed!"
You might even say:
"It's just a fantasy, I know that I would never do this in the real world!".
I understand what you're saying. I do hear you.
But here's the problem:
The people who want to do it in the real world are also going to say that.
I'm sorry if you're too autistic to understand the fact that people can lie. When all you can say is "It's just a fantasy", we have no guarantee you're telling the truth.
From the perspective of others, you're indistinguishable from the people who are an actual threat to children, people who actually have urges to harm real children.
There's also the risk that as you consume that content, you'll need more and more extreme material to satisfy your urges. It might never spill over into real offenses, but what guarantee do you have of that?
Let's imagine you're a principal and you find out one of your teachers has a lolicon collection. What do you do? Believe them when they say it's just a fantasy and let them keep working, or you fire them and launch an investigation to make sure they haven't done some weird shit?
What do you think is going to happen if you let them keep their job, they offend, and it comes out in an investigation that you knew about their lolicon collection? You'd lose your job, and you would be held partially liable.
It makes much more sense to treat them as a danger and not allow them in a position of power over children.
If you're going to say that lolicon is good because it's an outlet for these people to not offend, you're kind of admitting that it is a form of pedophilia, which is all I've been trying to claim.
What about the issue of child predators using this material to groom children? Is that something you've taken into consideration? That's one of the potential harms of this material being widely available.
1. The Indonesian is talking
2. The character is 15 (>Google)
3. You can tell the character is a child due to the height and anatomy (It's like asking how can you tell a child is a child)
4. Your account is filled with loli and racism, when YOU literally shouldn't be speaking 😭
totally accurate take everyone on earth draws a line on free speech and the only reason anyone wouldn't draw a line on it and think everything and anything should be allowed is because they have the most bottom of the barrel perverse lifestyle known to man
hey Parlo @p0lar_rblx , mind explaining why you didn’t include in this doc that
1. you’ve been aware of the fact Schlep stopped working with AceTheNarrator for well over a month
2. cropped your response to Schlep in your section about the group chat (showing you had 0 understanding of the allegations at the time too)
3. brought the evidence you gathered to the public without bringing it to his attention, acting like he was complicit when he was unaware of any evidence?
Genuinely just wondering!
Seems extremely deceptive and vindictive to me, especially considering you pushed the spread of it to a large advocate of lolicon, something you’ve heavily railed against in the past, but what would I know!
Incredibly convenient timing by the way, just a few hours ago I wasn’t even blocked! Guess he knows the jig is up.
😃
Fun fact, this is Nathorix, a pedophile, claiming that Schlep faked being groomed for 'fame and status'. He is STILL to this day friends with Ripull, Schlep's groomer.
Really cool!
@ImDunesi it's funny cuz even if everything was real it's legal in my country. xd
it's been a thing floating around for years and I'm still here.
Also, it's not like they even know my age to begin with or how old screenshots are.
What's stopping me from doing something legal?
Hot Take but Chibi Reviews is 100% correct, the entire point of Free Speech is protect ALL speech, including art—even (especially) if that art offends you, people murder/gore people in video games all the time yet it doesn't make them murderers or cause real world violence.
"I have no brain and I must defend pedophilia"
Earlier in the thread they demand an example of what I'm saying in the post about artists using references, because otherwise it's just conjecture.
The example of Dorontabi, the guy who is responsible for the "uoooh correction 😭💢" meme (the biggest lolicon meme which has kinda become the symbol of the whole community) openly talking about collecting Japanese child idol DVDs gets brought up.
He's dismissed as a random Korean artist in 2019. So that's a total goalpost shift with a side of disingenuous drivel. The guy didn't reach his peak in popularity until 2023. He also created guest art for Blue Archive, biggest lolicon game around.
they dont care about whats right or wrong, they've gone down the gooner rabbithole so deeply they cant think with their brains first anymore. this is why no one likes gooners except their own echo chambers