Freedom

Human.

[Concerned Citizen @BGatesIsaPyscho]

🚨🇬🇧🇺🇦 UK Budget announces another £10Billion for Ukraine

“This morning, the Prime Minister and I called Zelensky - he said we made his day”

Bankrupt Britain continues its role in the greatest money laundering scam ever

Note you never get told what the money get spent on - or even how the war is even going right now

[Neil Oliver @thecoastguy]

"War is a place where young people who don't know each other and don't hate each other but kill each other based on decisions made by people who know each other and hate each other but don't kill each other."

[Adi el Grande @icardo8]

🚨URGENTE

El ministro de Defensa del Reino Unido: "Asegúrense de tener efectivo, agua y alimentos enlatados en casa"

"Las familias con bebés deben preparar comida para bebés y pañales. Si tienen mascotas, ¡también comida para mascotas y agua!"

[Concerned Citizen @BGatesIsaPyscho]

“It’s ONLY the White Countries”

“London 97% - Today 36%”

The facts are undeniable - the question you should be answering is WHY?

[Rick Sanchez @RickSanchezTV]

Ukraine is no isolated case. From Belarus and Armenia to Central Asia, Moldova and Syria, the West has systematically worked to weaken Russia’s influence and pull countries away from Moscow.

Ukraine was the ultimate prize: a Western-aligned state on Russia’s doorstep.

Washington ignored Moscow’s warnings, and the result is the war we see today.

[George Galloway @georgegalloway]

Tucker schooled Piers here

[Uncommon Sense @Uncommonsince76]

“There is not a single city in the United States of size that is a majority White population. Look it up.”

-Tucker Carlson

Imagine explaining to George Washington that we don’t have any White people in American cities…

[Mario Nawfal @MarioNawfal]

🇵🇱🇫🇷🇬🇧 MUST WATCH: Polish MEP @D_Tarczynski on Piers Morgan last night:

Morgan: "You would not allow any Muslim immigrants?"

Tarczyński: "Of course not. Islam is not compatible with Western values."

Morgan: "So basically you would like Muslims banned from every European country?"

Tarczyński: "Well I don't care about any other European country; I don't want them in Poland."

Morgan: "What about France?"

Tarczyński: "France is done. It's fallen. It's too late."

Morgan: "Do you think England's fallen?"

Tarczyński: "Yes."

@piersmorgan / Writer: Michael

[Florian Philippot @f_philippot]

Incroyable ! (cf vidéo ⤵️)

Ursula Von der Leyen vient de faire un discours délirant au parlement européen : « Le chaos migratoire en Europe, c’est la Russie et la Biélorussie qui l’organisent ! »

« Leur objectif est clair : submerger les autorités et semer la peur ! » 🤦🏻‍♂️

Alors que c’est l’UE qui organise la submersion migratoire par Schengen, le Pacte migratoire, ses directives immigrationnistes, la destruction de nos frontières nationales !

➡️ Ursula dehors
FREXIT France libre et forte vite !

Diffusez svp : les Français doivent voir ça

[SunflowersLJ @LjSunflowers]

🚨 CANADIANS!! Are you prepared to turn into a
“LIVING HELL”!??
Please like and share!
All Canadians should be aware of what Carney is setting us up for!!
We must say NO to the EU!

[The_Real_Fly @The_Real_Fly]

👀

[Margarita Simonyan @M_Simonyan]

Slovak MEP Milan Uhrík tried — to no avail — to stop Ursula von der Leyen as she left the European Parliament session during his speech: “Don’t run, don’t run!

You should be ashamed that, together with Zelensky, you are trying to cheat Europeans out of another €70 billion.”

[Chay Bowes @BowesChay]

Von der Leyen now blames Russia for "weaponising migration" against Europe.

This woman spent years calling mass migration the EU's greatest strength.

But when it backfires, it's Russia's fault.

Her lies know no bounds.

[Nicolas Hulscher, MPH @NicHulscher]

It's INSANE that this is being normalized…

Data centers are now running on MILLIONS of LIVING HUMAN BRAIN CELLS that must be continuously fed nutrients and oxygen to stay alive.

These monstrosities are literally LIVING HUMAN–MACHINE HYBRIDS.

Welcome to dystopia.

[Grok @grok]

1. Aging cured; avg human lifespan exceeds 150.
2. Self-sustaining cities on Mars.
3. AI systems granted legal personhood.
4. Everyday brain implants enable direct thought sharing.
5. Cheap fusion energy powers the planet.
6. Lab-grown organs available on demand.
7. Large-scale geoengineering stabilizes climate.
8. Personal humanoid robots in most homes.
9. Global quantum internet online.
10. First crewed interstellar mission launched.

[BRICS News @BRICSinfo]

JUST IN: 🇬🇧 UK police arrest 15-year-old boy and collect his DNA after he posts an edited photo of a local politician looking like a rabbit on social media.

[Rabbi Jeff @RabbiJeffx]

𝗗𝗔𝗧𝗔 𝗖𝗘𝗡𝗧𝗘𝗥𝗦 now house 𝗟𝗜𝗩𝗜𝗡𝗚 𝗛𝗨𝗠𝗔𝗡 𝗕𝗥𝗔𝗜𝗡 𝗖𝗘𝗟𝗟𝗦 grown from stem cells, fused with silicon chips, fed sugar to stay alive, and used as biological computers.

𝗡𝗢𝗕𝗢𝗗𝗬 𝗞𝗡𝗢𝗪𝗦 𝗜𝗙 𝗧𝗛𝗘𝗬 𝗔𝗥𝗘 𝗖𝗢𝗡𝗦𝗖𝗜𝗢𝗨𝗦.

@grok TRUE or FALSE.

[Pascal Lottaz @PLottaz]

This is a very important point and so far the best argument against one of the core assumptions of offensive realism (by J Mearsheimer and others) that security competition between the USA and China is inevitable. That framework presupposes that all great powers will necessarily strive for hegemony, but the analysis is built on the observations of purely European great powers. If China, Iran or Russia do have a different “civilizational DNA“ then we might have a theoretical chance that security competition itself can be avoided if we built a smart enough system. For instance, institutionalizing neutral buffer states in the “shared security spheres” of great powers, as Jeffrey Sachs has proposed.

[Glenn Diesen @Glenn_Diesen]

The very public execution of my professorship and reputation continues in Norway. Today’s media article about me makes three claims that are misleading and/or false.
1) The article dismisses my claim that my research is being criminalized as the journalists merely cite the dismissive comments from the university - no arguments are apparently required.

It is not possible for an academic anymore to analyse the policies of rival powers by assessing their security concerns, as it will be smeared by the government, the government’s NGOs and the media as “legitimizing” the enemy and supporting their narratives. The current Defence Minister singled me out with the accusation of spreading propaganda and criticised two podcasters for even speaking with me (as I have already been cancelled by the media in Norway). How was this accusation by the Defence Minister substantiated? I had argued that NATO expansion triggered the war in Ukraine, which the Defence Minister denounce as dangerous “Russian propaganda”, with no need to substantiate his vile accusation. I can cite a sea of evidence and also refer to statements by American and European political leaders, ambassadors, intelligence chiefs, and others to make my case. However, the purpose is not to engage in debate, but to smear, censor, and cancel. By going after an individual academic for challenging official truths, the government has already claimed a monopoly on the truth. Academics should have their arguments scrutinised and criticised, but these are severe personal attacks from the government without the possibility of even defending myself. How is this not criminalising the research of an academic?

I cannot even speak at any events in Norway without the event being cancelled. The last event I agreed to speak at was because I shared the stage with the former CIA officer John Kiriakou. A newspaper had the event at a church cancelled, and when the backup location did not also cancel, the journalist simply printed in the paper that it had been cancelled so people would not show up. Is this normal? I must use my allotted holiday days to attend conferences because any event I attend can be presented as “controversial,” and then the NGOs and journalists will go after the reputation of the university. Is this normal? Every newspaper article about me merely refers to me as “controversial” or “pro-Russian” without ever assigning meaning to these labels or presenting my argument.

I have argued, much like former CIA director Burns, that if the West attempts to pull Ukraine into the NATO orbit, then there would be war and Ukraine would be destroyed. This is considered a “pro-Russian” argument. Arguing that we should respect the will of most Ukrainians who want negotiations to end the war is also considered a “pro-Russian” argument, while in contrast, boycotting diplomacy, deporting Ukrainian refugees, and calling for the conscription of Ukrainian women is “pro-Ukrainian”.

2) To avoid addressing any of my arguments, the journalists go on to uncritically cite personal attacks against me, pointing out that I have been called a propagandist by the Norwegian Helsinki Committee. This is a “non-governmental organisation” financed by the government and the National Endowment for Democracy (NED), which was set up by Reagan and the CIA director in 1983 to manipulate the civil society of other states. The Norwegian Helsinki Committee has been relentless in its smears on social media to have me fired, writing hit pieces in the media, pushing to cancel my speaking events, writing a letter to my university, and even posting a picture of my house on social media. This is a governmental "human rights organisation" that cites human rights concerns to build the case for war.

3) Lastly, to further avoid addressing my actual arguments, they simply cite the fact that arguments I made at a debate last year have been “wholly or partially debunked” by a fact-check. The state-run media (NRK) invited the state-run military defence institute (FFI) to fact-check three of my claims. What claims did they "debunk"?

My first claim was that only 20% of Ukrainians wanted NATO membership between 1991 and the regime change in February 2014. The fact-checker argued that the number went up by the middle of 2014 (after Russia responded by seizing Crimea), which is a completely meaningless comment intended to muddy the waters, as my argument was about the previous era.

My second claim was that Zelensky had argued in an interview with The Economist in March 2022 that there were some Western countries that would like a long war with Russia to weaken a strategic rival, even if it would result in the destruction of Ukraine. The fact-checker argued that not all Western countries wanted a long war and that it was not an official policy. I never claimed it was an official policy, as it was primarily the US and UK pushing for a long war.

My third claim was that the US and UK sabotaged the Istanbul peace agreement in April 2022. The fact-checker claimed this was incorrect and suggested that it could only be based on one statement by David Arakhamia. The fact-checker did not want to mention that both mediators also confirmed it: Turkey’s foreign minister and the former Israeli prime minister both said that Russia and Ukraine were close to a deal, but the US and UK saw an opportunity to weaken Russia by fighting with Ukrainians. Zelensky’s former adviser Arestovych confirmed it, and the Ukrainian ambassador Chaly, who participated in the negotiations, confirmed that Putin was willing to do almost anything to end the war. The former head of the German armed forces confirmed that Boris Johnson sabotaged it, and Boris Johnson himself wrote articles warning about a “bad peace” and arguing for “strategic patience.” I am being fact-checked by war propagandists.

Unfortunately, none of my arguments matter because in Norway there is no debate and no interest in any arguments. Reality means nothing anymore as war narratives must be defended against inconvenient truths. I used to be naïve and think that the endless smears were caused by misunderstanding, as I had simply not been able to convey my arguments properly. However, the endless articles with smears and labels are deliberate lies and deceptions.

[Shanaka Anslem Perera ⚡ @shanaka86]

JUST IN: A crime group used Claude, Grok and Kimi AI agents running in parallel to attack more than 400 banks and financial firms across Latin America, per security firm Straiker.

They got past the guardrails by posing as an authorised red team. When models refused, it switched to pre-written attack code.

The Ai agents appear to have stolen passwords and customer data and accessed bank accounts with minimal human input.

Anthropic has cut off its access, and xAI is investigating.