Meet Infeld: one place that brings your company knowledge together.
You don't have to ping colleagues for every answer anymore.
Ask Infeld in chat, or ask your own AI with Infeld connected as context via MCP.
Most AI demos start with a blank chat.
Real work starts with a customer thread, a half-finished spec, and a decision buried in Slack.
The model can be excellent and still give a bad answer when context is missing.
Infeld gives people and AI agents the context first, with the source attached.
Better AI starts with better memory.
At the first you need to understand "the model isn't the problem".
Claude is smart, but it just doesn't live inside your company, and when it pulls too much context, it starts hallucinating.
Use Infeld instead.
Teams burn about a quarter of the week just searching for answers.
That number is from Atlassian's State of Teams 2025 (about 12k knowledge workers). Email, Slack, old decks and then someone still gets pinged.
Now put money on it.
Say one knowledge worker costs you about $100k/year loaded.
25% of their time ≈ $25k/year spent hunting info per one person.
Our calculations:
If Infeld cuts around 90% of that search waste, you get most of that time back.
That's about 22.5% of their cost ≈ $22.5k/year per seat.
20 people ≈ $450k/year.
Salaries will vary by company. The 90% savings figure is our hypothesis.
The survey only shows the hunt is real.
Infeld pulls company docs and chat into one place so people ask once instead of digging.
Source: https://t.co/tUTEFTvhH5
First month at a new job, onboarding still not finished, and you take a week off.
You come back feeling lost. Teammates don’t know your project. 400 emails. Slack chaos. PM is remote, working in another time zone, and there’s no answer.
Normal in bigger companies? How much time would we save if we fixed this?
Sales isn't slow because sellers can't sell.
It's slow because the answer lives somewhere in docs.
Before:
Client asks if the integration supports SSO.
You dig through thirty Notion pages, then ten PDFs from last quarter, and at the end a Slack thread from engineering.
Meeting starts in 12 minutes. You're still not sure.
After:
You just ask Infeld.
Answer comes from the docs and chats you already connected and the Source is attached.
You finish the email or you walk into the call knowing what you can actually promise.
Rough take from us: for a lot of sellers that hunt through technical docs every day, this kind of setup can free part of your day. More time for other tasks.
If every client question turns into a docs dig, that's the problem Infeld is built for.
You open a weird retry with a hardcoded delay and an old TODO above it.
git blame says “fix flaky payments.” but the problem is author’s already gone.
And you still had no idea why the delay exists, information lived somewhere outside the repo.
How much does onboarding actually cost you?
Say it's a developer. Loaded senior time is around $100/hour.
And new hires always ask the same questions for weeks:
Why do we still use this library?
Where’s the staging credentials doc?
Who owns billing if support is offline?
Napkin (ours): about 8h/week × 12 weeks × $100/h it's about $9,600/hire.
If Infeld takes most of those repeats and that load drops around 70%, that's about $6,700 back on that line.
Seniors shouldn't be the onboarding wiki.
If you see this pattern in your company, check Infeld.
A website chatbot is useless if it doesn’t know your company.
Infeld on your site isn’t a separate ai bot.
It’s your data hub on the frontend.
If it doesn’t know, questions are saved.
Surface: chat bubble. Underneath: Infeld.
What even is OpenBot?
It’s a free, open-source Grok Bot alternative that runs locally on your machine.
Create AI teammates, give them jobs, and let them work for you.
There’s always that moment when Mr. Mirek retires.
Half your company knowledge walks out with him: his notes, docs and emails.
It doesn’t have to be like that.
Upload his files into Infeld.
The knowledge stays when he goes.
The person replacing him ramps up in a morning, not half a year.
They see what worked, what didn’t, and what Mr. Mirek actually meant when he set things up.
You were out of office for a week.
You can ask coworkers what happened, or read a bunch of messages, but it’s a waste of time.
Instead of that, just ask Leo what changed on your project.
You get the important stuff and back to work.
Speaking Thursday at NextGen Founders Meetup Kraków.
Topic: Web3 x AI: Agentic-Powered Environment
If you’re around and want to grab a word, come say hi.
Someone lands on your site with a question.
And asks "what it’s made of?".
If your site chat needs a human for that, it’s decoration.
Infeld on your website uses what you already uploaded.
When it knows, it answers.
When it doesn’t, at least you see what people kept asking.
Now even lovely Karen from HR will remember your birthday and buy you socks as a present.
Infeld knows everything about your company, just ask and get the answer.
Try it for free now: https://t.co/Nj2V6CJL0T
Something got decided months ago.
Nobody remembers where.
You start by asking around.
And Nothing, no one knows.
Then you ask the PM who’s been on the project forever.
Finally: an answer.
That’s not a process.
That’s a bottleneck that should disappear.
Leo in your team chat is only the surface.
Underneath: company knowledge from tools you already use + context for the AI you already run.
Check how it’s working.
“Poland is the Bangladesh of programming. Our companies’ hours were simply sold cheaper. We should be a hub that dominates in this theoretical art of intelligence.”
That’s what @jarokrolewski said in his latest podcast. I listened to it a few days ago, highly recommend it to everyone (link in the comments).
You can learn a ton of interesting stuff from it.
Poland has plenty of great specialists, but there’s one small problem.
For too long we’ve been selling hours instead of building our own edge.
I actually come from crypto, that’s where I built my experience, but now I also want to add something of my own and develop AI in Poland, not just watch how others do it.
Cheers from Kraków.