@BrysonGray It's about justifying an interpretation of a doctrine that is itself a creation of interpretation, versus those of the Church Fathers who learned from the Apostles. You choose an interpretive basis that is an institution itself, So it is fair to debate anothers.
@kinisman So you are not aware hes debating the foundation that allows that to be true. But you are arrogant to that fact and willfully blind. U are restating ur idea instead of basis of it to debate in comments, but not his open calls? Low iq.
@farmingandJesus According to ur logic every protestant "faith alone" doctrine followers doing evil makes the doctrine false. No its false because its a interpretation basis in doctrine vs anothers.
@Kryptotajeer I thought its corrupted why are you appealing to corrupt text and why do we have to confirm the quran? Also this is false interpretation because ur in a muslim cult.
@TulipPatriot Realizing "Faith Alone" is part of a doctrine that provides an interpretation, versus another basis for interpreting the book, is where you realize the issue. "Faith Alone" is the reason Protestantism fails.
@MakiTheSalafi Why are you appealing to currupted text? The shuffle is the "evil" people of the book judging a "holy" quran. only real dilemma. Also straw manned text and quran actually afirms what you are trying to say is evil in bible inbred lmao.
@realmikolson You don't know what he's arguing. Because you don't know the foundation hes exposing because you are blindly willfully coping inside of it.