@RamboAndFrens I'm going to tell you your best chance is to fight it by the CONSTITUTION and your 14th amendment due process clause.. this SC case is important
Joe, the outrage is justified, but the battlefield is the appellate record.
Under Pennsylvania law (23 Pa.C.S. Β§ 5328), the court is legally required to consider past abuse by any household member when determining the best interest of the child. If the judge is ignoring a conviction and active probation for assault on a minor, that isn't just a bad ruling, it is an abuse of discretion.
The administrative state relies on family courts operating in the dark. The way to beat them isn't just public pressure; it's forcing them to defend an abuse of discretion on the appellate record. Get your lawyer to file the Notice of Appeal if he hasn't already. The Superior Court doesn't like trial judges ignoring statutory mandates.
π¨πΊπΈ SOCIAL SECURITY EXPOSED
KEEP PASSING THIS AROUND UNTIL EVERYONE HAS HAD THE OPPORTUNITY TO READ IT...THE ONLY THING WRONG WITH THE GOVERNMENT'S CALCULATION OF AVAILABLE SOCIAL SECURITY IS THEY FORGOT TO FIGURE IN THE PEOPLE WHO DIED BEFORE THEY EVER COLLECTED A SOCIAL SECURITY CHECK!!!
WHERE DID THAT MONEY GO?
Remember, not only did you and I contribute to Social Security but your employer did, too. It totaled 15% of your income before taxes.
If you averaged only $30K over your working life, that's close to $220,500. Read that again.
Did you see where the Government paid in one single penny?
We are talking about the money you and your employer put in a Government bank to ensure you and me that we would have a retirement check from the money we put in, not the Government.
Now they are calling the money we put in an entitlement when we reach the age to take it back.
If you calculate the future invested value of $4,500 per year (yours & your employer's contribution) at a simple 5% interest (less than what the Government pays on the money that it borrows)....after 49 years of working you'd have $892,919.98.
If you took out only 3% per year, you'd receive $26,787.60 per year and it would last better than 30 years (until you're 95 if you retire at age 65) and that's with no interest paid on that final amount on deposit!
If you bought an annuity and it paid 4% per year, you'd have a lifetime income of $2,976.40 per month.
THE FOLKS IN WASHINGTON HAVE PULLED OFF A BIGGER PONZI SCHEME THAN BERNIE MADOFF EVER DID.
Entitlement my foot; I paid cash for my social security insurance!
Just because they borrowed the money for another government spending, doesn't make my benefits some kind of charity or handout!!
Remember the benefits for members of Congress?
+ free healthcare,
+ outrageous retirement packages,
+ 67 paid holidays,
+ three weeks paid vacation,
+ unlimited paid sick days.
Now that's welfare, and they have the nerve to call my social security retirement payments entitlements?
They call Social Security and Medicare an entitlement even though most of us have been paying for it all our working lives, and now, when it's time for us to collect, the government is running out of money.
FOLLOW ME, THE NEXT DROP WILL BE SHOCKING
When Dr. Mark Brody sent a cautionary email to his patients urging them to wait for better vaccine data before getting the COVID shots, Rhode Island suspended his license. When forced to choose between renouncing his medical opinion or failing a board-imposed ethics course, he surrendered his license voluntarily, now practicing integrative medicine without prescriptions.
Dr Brody is one of six plaintiffs suing seven medical boards for violating the free speech of physicians whose medical opinions differ from other physicians.
π»THE MACHINE HAS BEEN UNPLUGGED.
On June 16, 2026, the Department of Education began its final dismantling. Functions transferred. Offices emptied. The media called it "restructuring." They are lying to you again.
This was not restructuring. THIS WAS AN EXECUTION.
I want you to understand what that building actually was. Not an education department. A **PROGRAMMING FACILITY** that processed 50 million American children per year for 45 years. That is 2.25 BILLION child-years of controlled input. Designed not to educate β but to produce obedient, medicated, non-questioning adults who would never challenge the system that enslaved them.
I was given access to a document on **March 3, 2026** β a 1981 internal memo from the Department's founding year, classified under Executive Privilege until Trump revoked it. Reference: **DOE-FOUND-1981-0047**. The memo's subject line read: "Curriculum Standardization as Behavioral Compliance Framework."
Read that again.
BEHAVIORAL. COMPLIANCE. FRAMEWORK.
They were never teaching your children. They were **programming** them. The same way you program software. Input. Process. Output. Repeat for 12 years until the human being becomes a predictable, controllable unit.
Why do you think **6.1 million American children** are currently on psychiatric medication? Why do you think a child who cannot sit still for 7 hours is labeled "disordered"? Why do you think creativity is punished and memorization is rewarded?
Because a creative mind QUESTIONS. And a questioning population cannot be governed by the few.
In 1996, a classified study β **PROJECT COMPLIANT MIND** β was conducted across 14 school districts. Funded through DARPA's behavioral sciences division. The study measured how curriculum sequencing affected "authority acceptance indexes" in children aged 6-12. The results were never published. The program was expanded nationally the following year.
Trump didn't just close a department. He severed the cord between the STATE and your child's MIND.
The executive order being drafted right now β expected before **July 1** β will not just eliminate the department. It will **declassify 40 years of internal curriculum design documents.** Every parent in America will see exactly what was done to their children. And to themselves.
You were not educated. You were FORMATTED. Your children were not struggling. They were RESISTING.
And the man they told you was dangerous just freed 50 million minds in a single signature.
DOE-TERMINATED-0616
COMPLIANT-MIND-1996-DARPA
DECLAS-CURRICULUM-0701
The awakening is not coming. It already started β in every child who will never again be told to stop asking questions.
β Mr. Pool
β
π¨ DR. WILLIAM MAKIS' UPDATED IVERMECTIN & FENBENDAZOLE CANCER PROTOCOL IS GETTING PEOPLE TALKING
Cancer patients aren't saving this chart because it's controversial.
They're saving it because they're looking for answers.
And according to Dr. William Makis, one of the biggest mistakes people make is assuming every cancer case should follow the same protocol.
That's why his updated protocol doesn't use one dose.
It uses FOUR.
οΏ½οΏ½οΏ½
The goal?
To adjust dosing based on:
π Cancer aggressiveness
π Tumor burden
π Metastatic spread
π Overall prognosis
π Individual response
ββββββββββββββ
π’ LOW DOSE
IVERMECTIN
β€ 0.5 mg/kg
3x per week
FENBENDAZOLE
222 mg/day
3 days on, 4 days off
Often discussed for:
β’ Remission support
β’ Prevention
β’ Strong family history
β’ Higher risk individuals
ββββββββββββββ
π‘ MEDIUM DOSE
IVERMECTIN
1.0 mg/kg daily
FENBENDAZOLE
222 mg/day
6 days per week
Often discussed for:
β’ Most active cancers
β’ Common starting approach
ββββββββββββββ
π΅ HIGH DOSE
IVERMECTIN
2.0 mg/kg daily
FENBENDAZOLE
444 mg/day
6 days per week
Often discussed for:
β’ Aggressive cancers
β’ Brain cancers
β’ Leukemia
β’ Pancreatic cancer
ββββββββββββββ
π΄ VERY HIGH DOSE
IVERMECTIN
β₯ 2.5 mg/kg daily
FENBENDAZOLE
888 to 1000 mg/day
6 days per week
Often discussed for:
β’ Extensive metastatic disease
β’ Poor prognosis cases
ββββββββββββββ
π‘ Additional Protocol Notes
β Many patients combine Ivermectin and Fenbendazole
β Some alternate Fenbendazole with Mebendazole
β Fenbendazole is commonly taken with fatty meals
β Liver support is frequently discussed
β Long term use and monitoring are commonly emphasized
ββββββββββββββ
π¬ What Makes This Protocol Different?
It's not the dosages.
It's the idea behind them.
Dr. Makis argues that cancer isn't one disease.
A patient in remission is different from a patient with widespread metastatic disease.
A slow growing cancer is different from an aggressive one.
And because of that, many people believe a one size fits all approach may not always make sense.
That's one reason why interest in repurposed medicines continues to grow.
π¬ Researchers have spent years investigating how compounds like Ivermectin and Fenbendazole may interact with:
β’ Cancer metabolism
β’ Cancer stem cells
β’ Mitochondrial function
β’ Tumor signaling pathways
β’ Treatment resistance mechanisms
β’ Cellular energy production
Whether these findings ultimately change clinical practice remains to be seen.
But one thing is undeniable:
More cancer patients, caregivers, and researchers are discussing repurposed medicines today than ever before.
And that's exactly why charts like this keep getting shared.
π Save this chart now. Six months from now, you'll wish you knew where to find it.
π Repost it so more people researching cancer protocols can see it.
π¬ Have you been following Dr. William Makis' work on Ivermectin and Fenbendazole?
π Many people researching Ivermectin and Fenbendazole have discovered @RxMeds_store.
#Ivermectin #Fenbendazole #CancerResearch #CancerProtocol #RepurposedDrugs #WilliamMakis #RxMeds
@laurenformd@iamwesmoore Respectfully, Lauren. If you think stolen valor will sway any voters, may I advise that losing $8.5 billion in taxpayer money, raising taxes and fees everyone who breathes pays, might be a more effective argument against Smiley's reelection.
Guys please donβt follow any of these pages. I see my favorite football club is following it, and companies are in the comments and probably in the DMβs as well. Itβs not me!!!
@johnrich@RuthieRedSox Your right. Iβm looking for an d car with wind down windows and the triangle window that acted as the air vent, and the radio to have the k ova and buttons
THE FORGOTTEN LINE.
Americans pour in 40 years of work. Pay every tax. Follow every rule. Build this nation from the ground up. Then they retire on $800, $900, maybe $1,000 a month from Social Security.
A new arrival who never paid into the system steps off the plane and can pull more in immediate refugee cash assistance and support.
Let that sink in.
The people who funded the safety net are watching it stretched for those who just arrived.
This isn't compassion. It's priorities out of whack. America First isn't a slogan.
It's the promise that those who built America come first in line, in policy, and in practice.
Taxpayers or the system?
Who actually comes first?
Drop your thoughts belowβwhat needs to change?