This is what forgetting Christianity does to a civilization:
“The modern world imagines that it has outgrown religion. It has done nothing of the kind. It has merely forgotten it. And because it has forgotten it, it no longer understands itself.
Men do not realize that the whole framework of their moral judgments, their political habits, and even their intellectual methods were formed within a Christian society and cannot exist long outside it. When that framework breaks, they will not find themselves enlightened, but bewildered; not free, but enslaved; not rational, but confused.”
— Hilaire Belloc, Europe and the Faith
The funniest maths in modern environmentalism.
One almond requires 12 litres of irrigated water to produce. Peer-reviewed, ScienceDirect, 2017. A glass of almond milk contains roughly 50 of them. 600 litres of water before the carton is filled.
The water comes from the San Joaquin Valley in California, which sits over one of the most over-extracted aquifers on earth. The valley floor has subsided by up to nine metres in places due to groundwater depletion. The carton is then refrigerated, sailed across the Atlantic, refrigerated again, lorried to a Manchester Tesco, and bought by someone who is concerned about the environmental impact of dairy.
Meanwhile, in Cheshire.
A British dairy cow drinks roughly 70 to 100 litres of water a day and produces around 28 litres of milk. That's about 3.5 litres of water per litre of milk. The water is rainwater that fell on her field or came from a local stream fed by the same rainwater. The rain was going to fall on the field whether the cow stood in it or not. 80% of her moisture intake comes from the grass itself, which is also rain.
She converts the grass, free of charge, into a litre of milk containing seven times the protein and four times the calcium of almond milk, and shipped roughly 18 miles to the same Tesco.
To recap.
600 litres of stolen aquifer, flown halfway round the world for nutritionally worthless beige water.
Or 3.5 litres of rain that was already falling, converted by an animal you can pet, into actual food.
The shopper picks the almond.
She has been told this is the ethical position.
The aquifer would like a word.
This is insane.
The historic Église Saint-Cyriaque church in Montenach, France, was just set on fire.
Survived both world wars but couldn’t survive diversity.
Goodbye = God be with you
Holy smoke = election of a Pope
Breakfast = break the fast
Holiday = Holy Day
People have forgotten who they are, they don’t even know what the words they are saying actually mean.
You must understand, the leading Bolsheviks who took over Russia were not Russians. They hated Russians. They hated Christians.
Driven by ethnic hatred they tortured and slaughtered millions of Russians without a shred of human remorse. It cannot be overstated. Bolshevism committed the greatest human slaughter of all time.
The fact that most of the world is ignorant and uncaring about this enormous crime is proof that the global media is in the hands of the perpetrators.
— Alexander Solzhenitsyn
A community college professor taught the same study skills lecture for 30 years, and the video quietly became one of the most watched educational recordings on the internet.
His name is Marty Lobdell. He spent his career as a psychology professor watching students fail not because they were lazy, but because nobody had ever taught them how their brain actually works under the pressure of learning something hard.
The lecture is called "Study Less Study Smart." Over 10 million views. Passed around in Reddit threads, Discord servers, and university study groups for over a decade. And the core insight buried inside it has been sitting in cognitive psychology research for years, waiting for someone to explain it in plain language.
Here is the framework that completely changed how I think about effort.
Your brain does not sustain focus the way you think it does. Studies tracking real students found that the average learner hits a wall somewhere between 25 and 30 minutes.
After that, efficiency doesn't just decline. It collapses. You're still sitting at your desk, still looking at the page, but almost nothing is going in.
Lobdell illustrated this with a student he knew personally. She set a goal of studying 6 hours a night, 5 nights a week, to pull herself out of academic probation. Thirty hours of studying per week. She failed every single class that quarter.
She wasn't failing because she lacked effort. She was failing because she had confused time spent near books with time spent actually learning. The 25-minute crash hit her at 6:30pm every night. She spent the next five and a half hours sitting in the wreckage of her own focus and calling it studying.
The fix sounds almost too simple. The moment you feel the slide, stop. Take five minutes. Do something that actually gives you a small reward. Then go back. That five-minute reset returns you to near full efficiency. Across a six-hour window, the difference is not marginal. It is the difference between thirty minutes of real learning and five and a half hours of it.
The second thing he taught destroyed something I had believed about how memory actually works.
Highlighting feels productive. Going back over your notes and recognizing everything feels like knowing. But recognition and recollection are two completely different cognitive processes, and your brain is very good at making you confuse them.
You can see something you've read before and feel completely certain you understand it, even when you couldn't reconstruct a single sentence from memory if the page were blank.
He proved this live in the room. He read 13 random letters to his audience. Almost nobody could recall them. Then he rearranged the same 13 letters into two words: Happy Thursday. The whole room got all 13 without effort.
Same letters. Same count. The only thing that changed was meaning.
The brain stores meaning. Not repetition. The moment new information connects to something you already understand, the retention changes entirely.
This is what the cognitive psychology literature calls elaborative encoding, and it is the mechanism underneath every effective study technique.
The third principle was the one that hit me hardest, and the one almost nobody applies.
Lobdell cited research showing that 80 percent of your study time should be spent in active recitation, not passive reading. Close the material. Say it back in your own words.
Teach it to someone else, or to an empty chair if no one is around. The struggle of retrieval is where the actual learning happens. Reading your notes again is watching someone else do the work.
His parting line has stayed with me longer than almost anything else I have read about learning.
He told the room that if what he shared didn't change their behavior, they hadn't actually learned it. It would just live in their heads as something they had heard once and felt good about.
He was right. And most people leave every lecture exactly like that.
The students who remember everything aren't putting in more hours.
They stopped confusing the feeling of studying with the fact of it.
@Uncommonsince76 Rabbi : *I cannot be any more clear*
Jackson is an antisemite
Rebuttal : Challenges his def of antisemite rightly highlighting Jackson’s benevolence toward other Semitic people
Rabbi : seethes // forced to clarify,
JACKSON IS A JEW HATER!
They lie in every single utterance
I watched hundreds and hundreds of clips to make this.
Hours and hours and hours of Jewish groups, speeches, discussions, etc.
Never once did I hear about any sort of virtue, charity, outreach, or anything that represented a positive outcome to anyone outside of their own in-group.
This might sound obvious, but it’s disturbing as someone who is Christian, that when you think about activities of the Church, it’s almost entirely about outreach - it’s all charity and saving souls and providing service. Mission trips to build houses in Honduras, or orphanages in Uganda.
With Jewish groups, there is no outreach. They don’t want converts, they have no “message” to spread, no moral obligation to uplift others.
The only virtues they ever express are, in fact, complete inversions. They’ll talk about “truth” a lot, but all they mean is that videos of dead Palestinian children need to be repressed so the “truth” that they are all terrorists can dominate.
Same with “peace.” Basically, “peace” is when Israel can murder with impunity and “terrorism” is when their victims defend themselves.
But outside of “truth”(lies) and “peace” (war) the “values” they discuss are not moral values, but the physical well-being of themselves.
I am happy to be corrected - feel free to comment here with any videos you can find of Jewish groups unselfishly helping others.
>Called out the armenian genocide
>Making the sequel to the Passion of the Christ
>Making an historically accurate series about the Siege of Malta
>Visited Mount Athos
>Defended the Holy Shroud of Turin and Jesus divinity on the Joe Rogan podcast
>Not on the files
Aura.
American Giant. One of the best to have ever done it.
Be Andrew Jackson
>Born 1767. Carolina backcountry. Edge of civilization.
>Father dies before you’re born.
>Mother raises you alone. Hard woman.
>American Revolution breaks out. You’re a teenager.
>Age 13. British soldiers capture you.
>Officer orders you to clean his boots.
>You refuse.
>He slashes your face and hand with a sword.
>Scars never fade.
>Thrown into prison.
>Contract smallpox.
>Nearly die.
>Released in a prisoner exchange.
>Return home broken and fevered.
>Shortly after, your mother dies of cholera.
>She was nursing American prisoners of war.
>You are 14.
>Completely orphaned.
>Frontier life hardens you.
>Study law. No schools. No polish.
>Become a lawyer. Then a judge.
>Honor culture.
>Duel repeatedly.
>One duel goes wrong.
>Shot in the chest.
>Bullet lodges inches from your heart.
>Doctors cannot remove it.
>You carry it for life.
>Rise in Tennessee politics.
>Become a general.
>New Orleans.
>British Empire returns.
>Veterans of Europe. Best army in the world.
>You have militia. Riflemen. Pirates. Farmers.
>They expect a massacre.
>You annihilate them.
>Victory so decisive it shocks the world.
>Become a national hero overnight.
>Enter presidential politics.
>Win the popular vote.
>Lose in Congress.
>“Corrupt bargain.”
>You do not forget.
>Run again.
>You win.
>First true populist president.
>Enemies immediately: elites, editors, bankers.
>They call you dangerous.
>You agree.
>Then comes the real war.
>The Second Bank of the United States.
>Private. Politically connected. Foreign investors.
>Controls credit. Controls elections. Controls survival.
>They call it stability.
>You call it tyranny.
>Bank president Nicholas Biddle believes you can be managed.
>Congress renews the Bank’s charter early, to force your hand.
>You veto it.
>Publicly.
>���The rich and powerful too often bend the acts of government to their selfish purposes.”
>The bankers panic.
>They unleash newspapers.
>Contract credit.
>Trigger economic pressure to break you.
>You escalate.
>Remove federal deposits.
>Shift them to state banks.
>The central bank begins to suffocate.
>The Bank collapses.
>No central bank.
>No financial sovereign above the people.
>The bankers want you dead.
>January 30, 1835.
>Capitol steps.
>Assassin approaches.
>Pulls a pistol.
>Click.
>Misfire.
>Second pistol.
>Click.
>Another misfire.
>You don’t flee.
>You attack him with your cane.
>Beat him until restrained.
>Courts declare the assassin insane.
>You are not convinced.
>Leave office having paid off the national debt.
>Only president ever to do it.
>Die 1845.
>Age 78.
Leaves behind:
The destruction of the central bank.
The precedent that finance answers to sovereignty.
The expansion of executive power.
A nation reminded that elites are never permanent.
Proof that an orphan from the American frontier can defy empires.
@DocPete4Texas Doc Chambers,
As you have clearly highlighted here, Jewish private equity is attempting to steal away as much resources as they possibly can from the American middle class.
From American Christians.
When are you going to denounce Jewish influence in the State of Texas?
From 1776-1965 the overwhelming majority of new immigrants to the United States were mandated by law to be from Europe.
That’s 189 years.
Then in 1965 the Hart-Cellar act changed that. Do you think that change has worked out?