A few examples of gynocentrism that evolutionary psychology promotes and ultimately normalizes:
1. Women as the more valuable sex reproductively, which justifies male subservience to assumed female sexual gatekeeping ("No means no" applies only to women, not men), near-unlimited female reproductive options, the tender years doctrine, default maternal custody, and the gov financial incentives that sustain them.
2. Female-only hypergamy, which supplies pseudoscientific backing for the romantic-love script, frames adultery and extreme promiscuity as adaptive, and underwrites “no-fault” norms on the grounds that hypergamy and romance are blameless biological reflexes.
3. Women as uniquely vulnerable to harms by virtue of reproductive and other biological traits, which legitimizes expansive institutions of female care and protection - protection from ordinary life inconveniences, from work, from potential violence (now extending to inventions of “micro-violence”), providing shelters, financial supports, and so on.
What would any of this look like without evolutionary psychology’s “just-so” stories propping-up these belief systems?
@lovinglyf3m@AntiFeminismAU The core difference between consensual sex work and human trafficking (specifically sex trafficking) is consent, autonomy, and the presence of force, fraud, or coercion.
@lovinglyf3m@AntiFeminismAU Women shouldn’t be obligated to provide men sex. But men should have the right to purchase sex work legally & consensually at a fair market price.