Ivanski

[Ivanski @Ivan_Joyce]

@littlemykonos Execution is too good. It will make a martyr out of him. He needs to suffer in solitary confinement so he can't radicalise his criminal mates. The cost is irrelevant.

[Ivanski @Ivan_Joyce]

@DrewPavlou Muslim and socialism. What a surprise! Hand in hand.

[Ivanski @Ivan_Joyce]

@catturd2 Lies are all they have.

[Ivanski @Ivan_Joyce]

@mirandadevine When your plan to destroy America goes a little too well. 😂

[Ivanski @Ivan_Joyce]

@Mel__Gibson01 😡

[Ivanski @Ivan_Joyce]

@CopperCation People are smarter than you think, dude.

[Ivanski @Ivan_Joyce]

@OliLondonTV Quit it, dude! You look ridiculous.

[Ivanski @Ivan_Joyce]

@libsoftiktok COURAGE!

[Ivanski @Ivan_Joyce]

@DrewPavlou Hugh!?

[Ivanski @Ivan_Joyce]

@sharrond62 No courage. There's no glory for a female athlete with a male on team.

[Ivanski @Ivan_Joyce]

@Not_the_Bee All the little zombie sycophants falling into line behind a bloke with lipstick.

[Ivanski @Ivan_Joyce]

@salltweets Ya gotta laugh.

[Ivanski @Ivan_Joyce]

@catturd2 Hollywood is a cesspool of elitist hypocrites.

[Ivanski @Ivan_Joyce]

@ianmiles That's all they have. Not more than two brain cells amongst the lot of them.

[Ivanski @Ivan_Joyce]

@sharrond62 Deviant.

[Mario Nawfal @MarioNawfal]

🇬🇧 A group of immigrants harass and assault a politician from Restore Britain.

It hasn't appeared in any mainstream media.

Now imagine a group of white people harassing and assaulting a Muslim politician.

What would happen? It would be all over the news, and they would be accused of racism.

Why not in this case?

A huge double standard...

Writer: Samuel

[Ivanski @Ivan_Joyce]

@ben_kew No value.

[Michael Shellenberger @shellenberger]

Well, that was wild. I'm at the Australian Parliament and just left a meeting with two staffers for the governing party. They told us that the government needed more power to censor things like the upcoming US execution of Nidal Hasan.

When I asked why they needed to censor that video, one said it was to prevent copycat killings. Copycat killings by governments? I asked. Er, no, they said. Copycat killings like of a backpacker, several decades ago.

So, under that logic, I pointed out, the government should censor things like last year's Bondi massacre, where two Muslims killed 15 people, no? Well, that was news, they said. Didn't they realize their bill would allow the government to censor news? They didn't seem to know, or care.

They also admitted that they did not know that the bill would allow the government to create and operate an unlimited number of fake social media accounts to attack its political enemies and spread disinformation. Having presented them with information they had never heard about a bill they had clearly not read, they emphasized to us, strenuously, that they were moving forward with the bill.

So there you have it. The government wants the power to arbitrarily censor scenes of violent crime, or violence, for any reason. And it wants the power to use an unlimited number of fake accounts to wage offensive disinformational warfare against the Australian people.

Given that the Bondi massacre last year increased public opposition to mass migration, and support for the populist One Nation Party, it seems obvious that the government wants to censor such events in order to protect its political power.

It's quite telling how obediently governing party members insist such a law is needed without even knowing what's in it.

[Ivanski @Ivan_Joyce]

@salltweets Seems consistent. Fits the profile.

[Ivanski @Ivan_Joyce]

@macsween_prue Lies, intimidation, and violence. That's all they have.