Jane Doe😷 💉😷💉😷💉😷💉😷💉😷

Here for the science

[Jane Doe😷 💉😷💉😷💉😷💉😷💉😷 @J__Doh]

countries with more vaccines on the schedule and higher uptake have higher life expectancy. Crucially, they clearly don’t have lower life expectancy. ⭐🌟

[Jerome Adams @JeromeAdamsMD]

A lot of people (some intentionally) miss the point here. The data doesn’t just show that countries with more vaccines on the schedule + higher uptake have higher life expectancy. Crucially, they clearly don’t have lower life expectancy.

So if you still won’t accept that vaccines help make populations healthier, intellectual honesty demands you at least admit they aren’t harming the healthiest countries. 🤷🏽‍♂️

[Jane Doe😷 💉😷💉😷💉😷💉😷💉😷 @J__Doh]

@EilishCatEyes @noplaceforsheep Where r you ? If in 🇦🇺 it can be cheaper to get prescription & pick it up from the chemist yourself

[Jane Doe😷 💉😷💉😷💉😷💉😷💉😷 @J__Doh]

@Gotwat31 @cheryl_kernot @noplaceforsheep Yes

[Jane Doe😷 💉😷💉😷💉😷💉😷💉😷 @J__Doh]

@noplaceforsheep Bummer, ow, but at least the vax gets you a milder case . Rest rest rest! Rest!

[Jane Doe😷 💉😷💉😷💉😷💉😷💉😷 @J__Doh]

@scrotely @caitoz You think firefighters don't know a lot more about that than you do?

[Jane Doe😷 💉😷💉😷💉😷💉😷💉😷 @J__Doh]

@caitoz Imagine a lithium-ion fire bomb exploding poisonous gases 10m from houses

[Jane Doe😷 💉😷💉😷💉😷💉😷💉😷 @J__Doh]

@EduEngr82 @CRYPT0L0GAN @kristinaEBP Humidity around nose is also protective against viruses compared to nose drying out in cold, windy or dry air

[Jane Doe😷 💉😷💉😷💉😷💉😷💉😷 @J__Doh]

@Strongisgentle @DavidPocock @GuardianAus Corporate profits boost if they'll donate to political parties. . Make it a crime to donate over $1k ond all favours

[Jane Doe😷 💉😷💉😷💉😷💉😷💉😷 @J__Doh]

@DavidPocock @GuardianAus PFAS pollution too?

[Jane Doe😷 💉😷💉😷💉😷💉😷💉😷 @J__Doh]

@DavidPocock @GuardianAus Big users should apply for water and power licenses as they will compete with locals

[Jane Doe😷 💉😷💉😷💉😷💉😷💉😷 @J__Doh]

@CovidSolidarit1 @brownecfm Lol "activate"? I didn't write that

[Jane Doe😷 💉😷💉😷💉😷💉😷💉😷 @J__Doh]

@CovidSolidarit1 @brownecfm And they can activate profit from healthier people who live longer as they they get diseases and old age anyway so need treatments and if they were healthy enough to work they can pay for medicines, care and operations

[Jane Doe😷 💉😷💉😷💉😷💉😷💉😷 @J__Doh]

@brownecfm Note that @bryan_johnson Avoidance of infectious airborne aerosols is crucial but missing from your science. We never used to filter drinking water either until eventually people caught up the the science. Now it's unquestionable

[Jane Doe😷 💉😷💉😷💉😷💉😷💉😷 @J__Doh]

@Nicole_Lee_Sch So then u have to go to war to get treatment because if U do get a diagnosis., afterwards every symptom and possible ailment gets dismissed as being due to that thing you're diagnosed with and not investigated for other causes as if only 1 diagnosis per person is possible

[Jane Doe😷 💉😷💉😷💉😷💉😷💉😷 @J__Doh]

@KatieMiller But profits increased and we've made more billionaires

[Jane Doe😷 💉😷💉😷💉😷💉😷💉😷 @J__Doh]

@Strongisgentle @blakandblack The smell of feet during the movie

[Jane Doe😷 💉😷💉😷💉😷💉😷💉😷 @J__Doh]

@blakandblack The music was infectious. I saw a procession not long ago. Just 1 person, or 3. Perhaps it was longer ago than it feels.

I remember the cheap yummy food. But there were also some horrible stories via word of mouth of elsewhere in the state. But bad people always find a way

[Jane Doe😷 💉😷💉😷💉😷💉😷💉😷 @J__Doh]

@StarboySAR Kill switch so they disable them if we try to use them for sovereign purposes

[StarBoySAR 🇭🇰 🇨🇳 🥭 @StarboySAR]

Brilliant piece from Pearls and Irritations. Finally, someone in Australia is saying out loud what the rest of us have been watching for the past five years

Let's be clear about what AUKUS actually is: the greatest military protection racket in modern history. Washington looked at its own crippled submarine industrial base—17 boats short, yards choking, Congress screaming—and found the perfect mark. A wealthy, eager, insecure middle power with a bipartisan fetish for great-power relevance and a defense minister who treats strategic questions like a classified state secret

The deal? Australia pays half a trillion dollars. In return, it gets used Virginia-class hand-me-downs—Block IV boats with a decade of wear already on the hulls, probably smelling faintly of its previous crew

Even more intriguing, the article confirms for what this overpriced second-hand Australian "sovereign" nuclear submarine fleet is actually for:

Hunting Chinese Jin-class and Type 096 SSBNs. Not to protect Sydney Harbour. Not to secure Australia's trade routes. To find, track, and if ordered, destroy the Chinese nuclear submarines that threaten continental America!

That's the job. That's the whole job. Australia just committed A$368 billion to be the US Navy's underwater security guard!

The comedy of "sovereign capability" is almost too rich. Sovereign? The reactors are American. The combat system is American. The weapons are American. The fuel is American. The intelligence feed is American. The maintenance schedule is American. Permanently tethering Australia to U.S. software, maintenance, and logistics, effectively ending any "sovereign" capability. The only thing Australian is the taxpayer—and the Prime Minister standing in front of a camera calling this independence

Australia is not buying a submarine; it is buying a node in a U.S. sensor network. The acquisition deeply integrates Australia into the U.S. military command structure, making Australia a tool for U.S. strategic objectives in the Indo-Pacific — while a massive amount of Australian wealth is transferred into the U.S. military-industrial complex

And the timing is exquisite. Washington just added another half-trillion to its own defense budget while Australia is told to hit 3.5% of GDP. America gets the money, the boats, the basing rights at HMAS Stirling, and a Pacific ASW auxiliary. Australia gets the bill, the dependency, and the warm fuzzy feeling of being taken seriously by the adults.

The U.S. 2025 National Security Strategy (NSS) emphasizes "burden-sharing among allies" and "realist diplomacy." This submarine deal is the perfect execution of that strategy: the U.S. maintains its military overmatch against China by essentially "outsourcing" the financial cost of undersea surveillance to Australia 🤡

Paul Keating called this three years ago. He was mocked, of course. The press club gasped. The security establishment rolled its eyes. But he was right then, and this article proves he's right now. It is worse than he thought. It's not that AUKUS is of little military benefit to Australia. It's that AUKUS is of negative military benefit to Australia—actively diverting resources from actual defense needs toward a capability designed for someone else's homeland

https://t.co/f7lYAMf3JY