Jack the milk2

Follow Man Utd , like punk rock, swear too much ,sick of bullshit hypocrisy , #GlazersOut #DefundTheBBC

[Denise 🇺🇸 @NoDMsPerfavore]

DO NOT SHARE THIS! 😁
ILHAN OMAR IS REPORTEDLY FURIOUS THAT PEOPLE KEEP CIRCULATING THE PHOTO OF HER WITHOUT HER HIJAB. SHE CLAIMS IT IS "DISRESPECTFUL TO HER AS A WOMAN, AS A CONGRESSWOMAN & TO HER RELIGION." SO LET'S BE CRYSTAL CLEAR: DO NOT SHARE IT! DO NOT REPOST IT!

[Katie Hopkins @KTHopkins]

How’s your day @piersmorgan - you sanctimonious shit-goblin?

Still on your knees gobbling Fauci cock?

[Liz Churchill @liz_churchill10]

NEVER let them forget what they said…

[Essex Patriot @Essex_Patriot]

Yes 🖐🏻

[Barbara Evans @beevans56]

This is Rachel Taylor, my MP.
She voted to take away my rights to a jury trial.
She voted to remove the WFA for pensioners.
She voted for Farmers to pay IHT.
She voted against the grooming gang enquiry.
Name and shame!

[Dave @DaveKent101]

More embarrassment for the Climate Scam and its No1 cheerleader Ed Miliband.

[🇬🇧🇬🇧Ben Jones🇬🇧🇬🇧 @BenJoRS2017]

@muggybonehead65 @ByrneBarry Make them all famous

[Grahamws @Grahamws2]

This is my MP for Wakefield, Jade Botterill, who voted against me and everyone else having a jury trial. Make her famous and make sure at the next general election she's out of a job and replaced by ReformUK

[Steve @StevieJenkin]

This is Torston Bell.
He is my MP.
He voted to take away my rights to a jury trial.
Make sure that he is never again voted in as MP for Swansea West.
Vote Reform and toss this man out!

[Roger Gall @Shambles151]

Tonight, my Labour MP for South Dorset voted to take away my right to a jury trial.

Can voters in his constituency ensure that he is never elected again?

https://t.co/uxRkcI4h5t

[Unplugged Toaster @chris_altv]

This is Kim Leadbeater. MP for Spen Valley and my MP.

She voted to scrap my right to a Jury trial. She is mean’t to represent her constituents and instead towed the party line

I will not be voting for her in future elections.

[Susan Hall AM @Councillorsuzie]

This 👇

[Steve Jones @Jones787Sj]

When you lift nothing more than a pen.......

[Samantha Smith @SamanthaTaghoy]

Since Andy Burnham is apparently lining up to be the next Labour leader, here’s a reminder:

Andy accused victims of Pakistani-Muslim grooming gangs of trying to “propagandise” the issue.

He tried to block the grooming gangs inquiry in Manchester and nationally.

He claimed that Pakistani-Muslims grooming gangs are a “thing of the past” despite clear evidence that little girls are still being victimised to this day, including in his local area.

He tried to shift the blame onto victims by refusing to acknowledge them as children —

Children who were raped, exploited and even murdered by Pakistani grooming gangs while powerful people like him turned a blind eye.

Andy Burnham belongs in prison, not in Parliament. And certainly not in 10 Downing Street.

[Wall Street Apes @WallStreetApes]

TODAY: Donald Trump officially withdraws the United States from the World Health Organization

Official Testimony Bill Gates was behind the World Health Organization global power grab

The WHO also involved in “WHO sex crime scandal, where 83 WHO staff has sexually exploited girls and women — including rape — victims as young as 13”

“Gates bought the WHO, and they now recommend his products. It is that simple. WHO's current sugar daddy is Bill Gates, who has made billions out of his investment in the same vaccines that WHO promotes.”

This official testimony is CRAZY

Bill Gates must face charges for Crimes Against Humanity

[Jim Chimirie 🇬🇧 @JChimirie66677]

When Victims Are "White Trash," Democracy Becomes Optional

There are moments when the mask doesn't slip gently but is ripped away, and the truth stares back at you, naked and ugly. Dennis Jones, a senior councillor in Peterborough, calling grooming-gang victims "poor white trash" was one of those moments. It wasn't just offensive. It was revelatory. In a few brutal words, it exposed how parts of the political class truly see the victims of organised sexual abuse: not as children robbed of their childhoods, but as refuse. People whose suffering can be mocked, minimised, and moved out of the way.

What followed is even more revealing than the insult itself. Jones stepped down as council leader. He apologised. He was "suspended" by Labour. The familiar choreography of damage control played out on cue. But he did not lose his seat. And now, thanks to a Labour-led decision to delay local elections, he may not face the public at all. The man who spat contempt at abused girls may be spared judgment simply by cancelling the vote. Power protected by procedure. Accountability quietly strangled. This is not a mistake. It is the system functioning as designed.

For decades, grooming victims were dismissed as unreliable, complicit, "troubled." Their abuse was downgraded because of who they were and where they came from. What Jones said out loud in Peterborough has been whispered in offices and embedded in policy for decades. If the victims are poor enough, damaged enough, unfashionable enough, their suffering becomes manageable. Their rape becomes paperwork. Their lives become noise. The cruelty was never accidental. It was structural.

Now that this contempt has surfaced in plain language, the system's reflex is not to cleanse itself but to close ranks. Elections are postponed. Capacity is cited. Reform is invoked. The public is told to wait. Democracy itself is treated as an inconvenience – something to be paused while reputations are padded and careers salvaged.

We are expected to believe this is about administrative upheaval. It isn't. It's about fear. Fear of voters. Fear of exposure. Fear of what happens when ordinary people are finally allowed to pass judgment on those who failed them. A councillor who dehumanised grooming victims should have been dragged before the electorate at the first opportunity. Instead, the electorate is being shut out.

This is how cover-ups endure. Not through secret meetings in dark rooms, but through shared instincts among the powerful. Delay. Deflect. Reframe. Let outrage fade. Push the reckoning down the road. By the time the vote arrives – if it ever does – the truth has been dulled and the victims forgotten once again.

The insult matters because it explains everything that came before it. You do not fight for people you secretly despise. You do not risk your position for children you have already written off. And you certainly do not pursue justice with urgency when the victims are regarded as politically worthless.

The real obscenity here is not one councillor's words, but the system's response to them. A political machine that cancels elections to protect itself has no moral authority left to claim. And a society that tolerates that manoeuvre is being trained, slowly and deliberately, to accept contempt in place of justice.

When victims are treated as disposable, democracy itself becomes optional. That is the road we are on. And it ends in darkness.

"What Dennis Jones said out loud in Peterborough has been whispered in offices and embedded in policy for decades. If the victims are poor enough, damaged enough, unfashionable enough, their suffering becomes manageable."

[Raja Miah @recusant_raja]

When Asked About Girls’ Safety, Andy Burnham Looked Away

Make no mistake about what you witnessed last week. Andy Burnham, Mayor of Greater Manchester and Labour’s would-be Prime Minister, was asked a simple question. Would he put the safety of girls before the fear of upsetting people.

He did not answer it.

What followed was his full ten-minute monologue. This was not leadership under pressure. It was evasion under scrutiny. A stage-managed performance in a familiar setting, chaired sympathetically, designed to avoid the one thing that mattered. A clear answer.

So look instead at what @AndyBurnhamGM actually did.

His defence rests on commissioning the “largest, longest-running inquiry.” What he does not say is that from the outset;

- it had no power to compel evidence
- Its terms of reference were set by institutions facing allegations
- Even the review team depended on Oldham Council and Greater Manchester Police to decide which documents they were allowed to see.

He then dismisses credible concerns about Oldham as “rumours.” Yet his own Assurance Review later confirmed that children in Oldham had been groomed and gang raped. Every case his experts examined confirmed this. Even then, the full extent of that abuse was obscured.

To this day, we do not know how many little White girls in Oldham were dragged off the streets and gang raped by Pakistani men.

Despite knowing both the truth of those concerns and the limits of his own review, Burnham still refused to call for a national inquiry that could have exposed who failed these children and why. Instead, he and his Labour Party allies hid behind a finding of “no evidence of a cover-up,” while having explicitly ruled out investigating whether a cover-up had taken place.

Only years later, after relentless campaigning and global attention forced the issue back into the open, did Burnham finally support national action.

And when confronted with this record, he does not answer it. He accuses his critics of spreading hate.

A full article will follow. If you still need convincing, you will then understand why this would-be Prime Minister refuses to face scrutiny in the open. He knows exactly what would happen if he were challenged directly on what he was part of.

So let there be no ambiguity.

The allegation facing Andy Burnham is his role in the cover-up of the industrial-scale gang rape of the nation’s children.

Name the time and place Andy Burnham. Face me. Face the millions who want to know who is telling the truth.

________

I’m Raja Miah. For seven years, I led a small team that exposed how politicians protected the rape gangs. Before that, I spent over a decade safeguarding children and protecting communities from extremists.

My work is free because the truth must circulate. But truth without numbers is easy to crush. The government does not fear facts. It fears scale.

Starmer and the Labour Party fear thousands reading, sharing, and backing the same work because numbers mean witnesses, pressure, and consequences. That’s why I am blacklisted by the legacy media. That's why this matters.

🔴 Subscribe to the newsletter. It’s free. Every subscriber is a number they can’t erase. Every reader widens the circle they can’t control.

👉 Subscribe here: https://t.co/56iWix5yC4

If you can afford it, please support for 75p a week (£3/month or £30/year). Not for perks. Not for access. But because numbers with backing become power. A few supporters can be ignored. Thousands cannot.

This is how this campaign survive. This is how we see this through. This is how voices like ours stops being managed and starts being feared.

🔴 Prefer a one-off contribution?
👉 https://t.co/kvFfhHNJ03
👉 https://t.co/8Og0hDKfjy

No sponsors. No parties. No institutions to lean on. Just numbers. Growing fast enough that covering this up becomes impossible.

We don’t need everyone. We need you.

– Raja Miah MBE

[Patriotic 🇬🇧 Nation @HoodedClaw1974]

Liberal Democrat MP Jane Dodds took a moral stand over Grok imagery today and left X.

Hard to believe that somebody with such morals voted against an enquiry into the grooming gangs.👇👇

Obviously gangs of men raping children for decades gets a free pass in Janes world.😒