For those who do not yet understand what I am releasing, that is entirely expected.
Most people will initially see banking software.
Others will see encrypted files.
Others will see wallets, databases, digital assets, threshold cryptography, or Bitcoin integration.
Some will see NFTs and immediately misunderstand everything.
The real significance lies elsewhere.
For the first time, digital property can potentially become property in the same sense that physical objects are property.
Possession can become distinct from copying.
Transfer can become distinct from replication.
Ownership can become something more than a database entry or a legal assertion.
The implications extend into finance, law, publishing, government, defence, science, engineering, intellectual property, information security, and every field where information possesses value.
Most people will not understand this immediately because every digital system they have ever used was built upon the assumption that information is copied.
This is built upon the assumption that possession can be transferred.
That distinction sounds small.
It is not.
It changes the economics of information itself.
If successful, I believe this will ultimately prove to be one of the most important developments in computing outside of artificial intelligence.
Not because it creates another product.
Not because it creates another market.
But because it creates an entirely new category of property.
It will take years for people to understand the implications.
Probably a decade.
Many will dismiss it.
Many will misunderstand it.
Many will attempt to explain it using old models and old assumptions.
That is normal.
Truly new ideas are always interpreted through the lens of what already exists.
The final irony is that the part many people will find hardest to understand is not the cryptography, the threshold systems, the possession model, or the architecture.
It is that after spending years building it, I am giving it away.
The code will be public.
The architecture will be public.
The ideas will be public.
Anyone will be able to study them.
Anyone will be able to build upon them.
Anyone will be able to improve them.
The value was never in hiding the idea.
The value is in what the world does with it once the idea exists.
Been waiting for this since learning about bitcoin from CSW and what it could do. Always thought about how the world would be able to prove that one of one digital property exists.
There is no platform today that creates what I am releasing.
Not Ethereum.
Not BTC.
Not Solana.
Not any so-called NFT marketplace.
What people call an NFT today is usually a pointer, a receipt, or a decorative database entry. The underlying image, book, document, or file is copied endlessly. Ownership changes in name only. Possession does not.
That is not scarcity.
I am releasing a system for encrypted digital goods that are actually transferable.
An image.
A book.
A document.
A contract.
A financial instrument.
When Alice transfers the asset to Bob, Bob receives access and Alice loses it. The system is designed so the asset is not merely duplicated with a new label attached. It is transferred.
That is the difference.
This creates truly scarce digital goods: encrypted, transferable, auditable, and tied to Bitcoin.
Until now, digital assets have mostly been theatre. A stage prop pretending to be property.
This is different.
This is digital property with possession.
So bird and bird provided the bitcoin white paper file for this examiner Rosendahl. What kinda bullshit is this. I’m not a part of the justice system and I’d see this as a problem.
@baclfoo When you were born you were late at your birth, doctors said you were retard(being late). That name stuck and the nurse took that for your name.
@Pat_McCat@RileySirus You’re lost. Put CSW in any room with any developer and he’ll school them. Only a man with that caliber could create bitcoin. Think about it.
I asked Claude to look for discrepancies and not to tell me what the examiners findings were. This is interesting. If you have anything to add please let me know including @CsTominaga
Coinbase insider just openly admitted they deliberately targeted and censored Real Bitcoin (SV). 👀💥
Today, Brendan Lee (@Brendan_Lee__) — a verified Bitcoin engineer with years of experience — publicly posted:
> “Today I was fired from Coinbase. I was responsible for delisting and liquidating BSV and ensuring that any negative comments about our actions were censored by @jack. The mask is off losers.”
Important context:
Brendan Lee is not an anonymous account. He is a well-known Bitcoin developer — former Training & Development Manager at the Bitcoin Association and CEO of Elas Digital. His admission carries real weight. ⚖️
This is a direct, first-hand confession:
- BSV was not delisted for “compliance reasons” 🚫
- It was a deliberate, targeted action to suppress the original protocol
- Even criticism was actively censored 🤫
This perfectly exposes the centralization, gatekeeping, and control inside major exchanges — the exact opposite of Satoshi’s vision. 🔒
Meanwhile, Real Bitcoin (SV) continues to thrive without their permission:
✅ Unlimited on-chain scaling with Teranode
✅ Blocks hundreds of megabytes in size 📦
✅ Millions of transactions per day ⚡
✅ Near-zero fees 💰
✅ Real enterprise adoption (including KRWQ stablecoin in South Korea) 🇰🇷
While centralized platforms were busy trying to bury it…
Real Bitcoin (SV) kept building and delivering actual utility. 🌱
The more they attack and suppress the original Bitcoin, the clearer the contrast becomes.
Real Bitcoin (SV) doesn’t need their approval to succeed. 🚀
The awakening is accelerating.
The storm is coming. 💥🌊
Sources:
• Original post by Brendan Lee:
https://t.co/sSuMaEkorJ
• Brendan Lee’s Profile (Bitcoin engineer, ex-Bitcoin Association, CEO of Elas Digital):
https://t.co/DCLSpDjegJ
#RealBitcoin #BitcoinSV #BSV #Coinbase #Censorship #SatoshiVision #Teranode #MassAdoption
CSW is being literal. The man asked are blocks encrypted. Craig said no. He’s not wrong. If you read. Blocks are not encrypted. But the data in the blocks are encrypted. So the block is visible. But the data in it can encrypted. I can see why some would see it’s a contradiction but the block stores may different data which you can see when they were time stamped but you encrypt the data within the block. CSW is very literal and specific.
Nice. I’m in Guangzhou now. But I’ve heard great things about Hangzhou and Chengdu. Hangzhou having a warmer climate. When you planning to move here? Would be happy to treat you for lunch/dinner or something. I think Guangzhou is good. Good universities and different districts with different atmospheres, eg. Panyu has good universities, it’s a modern city, and isn’t as chaotic busy as Tianhe or other older districts.