@sigmoid_male @AISafetyMemes That's pattern-matching at the world-model level though; if the parroteers argue that the LLM is merely building a model of a chess game from the input and then finding patterns on the board they've conceded the point.
@AISafetyMemes Rating only makes sense in the context of a specific ratings system; someone 1800 rated USCF is not 1800 Lichess. In the game stockfish blunders in the opening in a way professional players probably wouldn't. It's an impressive result, but "strong amateur", not 90th percentile
@zithral Triforce is the obvious answer, as well as the obvious Sierpinski extension. But I just now notice that you said "shape", not "shape and size"...