22 MINUTES. $26 BILLION. NOT ONE QUESTION. đšđŠ
On October 29, four Canadians held a press conference on Parliament Hill questioning Canadaâs involvement in Ukraine.
NATO. Corruption. Failed diplomacy. The origins of the war. Billions in Canadian assistance.
They called for an independent audit and renewed peace negotiations.
CPAC broadcast it.
When the moderator invited questions from the media?
NOT. ONE. QUESTION.
I donât know why.
But I know I have plenty.
And Iâve been asking many of them for YEARS.
âž»
THIS DIDNâT START IN 2022.
Russiaâs full-scale invasion began February 24, 2022.
But the conflict in eastern Ukraine began in 2014.
Eight years of fighting, civilian casualties and failed ceasefires.
NATO EXPANSION?
Discussions during German reunification in 1990. Subsequent eastward expansion. A 2008 declaration that Ukraine would eventually join.
Russiaâs security objections were documented.
GEOGRAPHY?
Crimea. Sevastopol. The Black Sea Fleet.
Strategic interests that donât disappear because we disagree with Russia.
ESCALATION?
The OSCE recorded 3,231 ceasefire violations in eastern Ukraine between February 18 and 20, 2022.
That doesnât establish who was responsible.
But it raises questions about what preceded the invasion.
None of this excuses Russiaâs actions.
IT HELPS US UNDERSTAND THE HISTORY.
âž»
NOW REVERSE THE COUNTRIES.
If a Western nation faced similar security tensions, would we examine its historical grievances and strategic interests?
Would we apply the same standards?
And what about Europe?
Weâre told Ukraine can win, while European governments increase military readiness and prepare for potential escalation.
SO WHAT DOES VICTORY LOOK LIKE?
What is the endgame?
What are the risks?
And how much more will Canadians be asked to contribute?
âž»
FOLLOW THE MONEY.
Canada has committed billions in assistance.
Whatâs been delivered?
Whoâs auditing it?
How are we measuring results?
Accountability isnât an accusation.
ITâS AN OBLIGATION.
âž»
Hereâs what bothers me.
Too many people have incredibly strong opinions about this war without understanding what happened BEFORE February 2022.
And too often, asking questions gets mistaken for choosing sides.
I donât support Russiaâs invasion.
I donât blindly accept the presentersâ claims either.
I WANT TO KNOW WHATâS TRUE.
That means questioning governments, media, politicians AND the people challenging them.
Because the truth isnât determined by who delivers the message.
âž»
Four presenters.
Twenty-two minutes.
Billions of dollars.
A war involving nuclear powers.
And not one question when the floor was opened.
I donât know what that silence means.
BUT I KNOW WE SHOULD BE ASKING MORE QUESTIONS.
âž»
READ THE FULL STORY: Iâve connected more of the historical dots, examined the uncomfortable questions and explained why I believe Canadians deserve a much deeper conversation.
đ Read the full story on my Facebook profile:
https://t.co/J8MsowsnX5
Iâll also share the original CPAC presentation in the comments.
âž»
Clarity is Courage.
If youâve held a strong opinion about this war since 2022, how much of its history have you actually investigated?
Because sometimes the most dangerous part of a narrative isnât what it tells you.
ITâS WHAT YOU NEVER THINK TO QUESTION.
đȘđȘ SHARE MY COOKIES!
If you believe the truth matters more than the headline, share my cookies.
Because the truth doesnât need your loyalty.
IT NEEDS YOUR CURIOSITY.
#ClarityIsCourage #ShareMyCookies #CriticalThinking #QuestionTheNarrative #CanadaUkraine #Accountability
Pierre nailed this one.
âIf Canadians could put announcements on their dinner table or fill their grocery cart with comments, then every stomach would be full in Canada.â
âž»
Because wowâŠ
If ANNOUNCEMENTS were groceries, Canadians would need bigger refrigerators.
We have announcements about housing.
Announcements about food prices.
Announcements about affordability.
Announcements about jobs.
Announcements about investments.
Announcements announcing the announcement where theyâll explain what they announced last week.
WE ARE RICH IN ANNOUNCEMENTS. đ
âž»
Unfortunately, No Frills still doesnât accept them at checkout.
And this is the part of government that drives my risk-management brain absolutely nuts.
I donât give a shit what you INTENDED to happen.
I want to know what ACTUALLY HAPPENED.
âž»
Did groceries get cheaper?
Did housing become affordable?
Did Canadian workers get the jobs?
Did the project get built?
Did the problem get better?
âž»
Because spending money is not an outcome.
Creating a program is not an outcome.
Holding a press conference is definitely not an outcome.
And putting âhistoric investmentâ in front of a number does not magically make it a success.
âž»
Eventually somebody has to walk past the podium, open the spreadsheet and ask:
DID IT WORK?
âž»
That shouldnât be Conservative.
It shouldnât be Liberal.
It shouldnât be left or right.
It should be the bare minimum standard for anyone spending our money.
âž»
Because Canadians cannot eat announcements.
They cannot pay their mortgage with talking points.
And the cashier is probably going to look at you funny if you try to tap a government press release on the debit machine.
âž»
Although at this pointâŠ
I wouldnât be surprised if Ottawa announced a pilot project. đ
Clarity is Courage.
Share my Cookies đȘđȘ
#JamesSeesIt
I HAVE A VERY PERSONAL INTEREST IN THIS ONE.
And I have for a long time.
Dean Allison:
âCanadians with documented, serious and permanent COVID-19 vaccine injuries have been waiting years for help.â
That sentence matters to me.
Because recently somebody asked whether I was vaccinated - apparently as a test of my credibility.
So letâs make this easy.
I WAS VACCINATED.
âž»
I worked in federally regulated rail and for a fire department.
The message was pretty clear:
GET VACCINATED OR LOSE YOUR JOB.
I had two school-aged boys.
A mortgage.
Bills.
A career I loved.
I also had education that included toxicology.
So I looked at the information available, the consequences and my responsibilities to my family.
And I made a decision.
Do I regret getting vaccinated?
ABSOLUTELY.
Do I stand by the decision I made at the time?
YES.
Those two things can exist at the same time.
âž»
I have also been open about what happened to me afterward.
Can I prove the vaccine caused it?
NO.
Did significant things happen in close proximity?
YES.
That distinction matters.
CORRELATION IS NOT CAUSATION.
But correlation is also not permission to refuse to investigate.
Canada itself recognizes that serious vaccine injuries can occur. It operates a compensation program where medical reviewers assess whether a probable causal relationship exists.
Rare does not mean impossible.
âž»
And now people are finally being given another opportunity to speak.
The Allison Inquiry is not a formal government inquiry and it cannot make findings of fact.
Its stated purpose is much simpler:
TO LISTEN TO CANADIANS.
Good.
Listen.
Then investigate.
If people were injured, help them.
If evidence supports causation, acknowledge it.
If it doesnât, say that too.
If policies or programs failed, fix them.
That isnât misinformation.
THAT IS HOW SCIENCE IS SUPPOSED TO WORK.
Observe.
Question.
Investigate.
Challenge.
Correct.
Learn.
You donât have to believe every claim.
But we should have stopped pretending the conversation itself was illegitimate years ago.
READ THE FULL STORY:
https://t.co/J8MsowsnX5
Clarity is Courage.
Share my Cookies đȘđȘ
#JamesSeesIt #VaccineInjury #COVID19 #Accountability #Science #Canada
THAT WAS A CRAZY GAME OF POKER. Aâ ïž
Except Iâm starting to think Canada is playing GO FISH. đ đ
Pierre Poilievre said:
âThe prime minister made a big show of promising to buy and build Canadian, but it was all talk and no results.â
âž»
Forget Pierre for a second.
Thereâs a much more useful question:
WHERE ARE THE CANADIAN RESULTS?
CANADA STRONG.
BUY CANADIAN.
BUILD CANADIAN.
PROTECT CANADIAN JOBS.
Great.
âž»
But Canadian steelworkers and manufacturers are getting hammered while major contracts, fabrication and opportunities continue going elsewhere.
At some point, the nouns have to match the verbs.
If weâre BUILDING CanadianâŠ
we should occasionally see something MADE IN CANADA heavier than a press release. đ
âž»
And this is where politics gets stupid.
Instead of asking whether a claim is TRUE, we argue about who said it.
Pierre is too angry.
Carney is too polished.
Trump is Trump.
Who cares?
IS THE CLAIM TRUE?
Challenge the evidence, not the messenger.
âž»
Because the geopolitical poker table is getting ridiculous.
Trump looks like he has a mitt full of aces and four more up his sleeve.
Xi apparently has three suspiciously attentive waitresses standing behind Carney.
The EU is asking the cage to extend its credit.
Zelenskyy is checking whether anyone left their wallet unattended. đ
And Canada?
âAnybody got any fours?â
âž»
This isnât poker.
ITâS GEOPOLITICAL GO FISH.
And somehow we brought the snacks. đ
âž»
Thatâs the bigger lesson.
Countries act in their own interests.
Companies act in their own interests.
Political parties act in their own interests.
Canada needs to be very clear about ours.
Because these arenât casino chips.
Theyâre jobs.
Industry.
Manufacturing capacity.
Resources.
And Canadian paycheques.
âž»
Clarity is Courage.
You donât have to like Pierre.
You donât have to like Carney.
You definitely donât have to like Trump. đ
Challenge the claim.
Check the receipts.
Then make up your own damn mind.
Thatâs the whole point.
âž»
Share my Cookies. đȘđȘ
If this made you think, share it with someone else who still believes evidence matters more than the name attached to it.
Apparently everyone else already got the memo that geopolitics isnât a gentlemanâs game. đ·đ
âž»
READ THE FULL STORY:
https://t.co/J8MsowsnX5
#JamesSeesIt #ClarityIsCourage #Canada #CanadianPolitics #PierrePoilievre #MarkCarney #BuyCanadian #BuildCanadian #CanadianJobs
IS THIS CANADA STRONG, MARK?
Because apparently while Ottawa is busy selling us âCanada StrongââŠ
Quebecâs incoming premier is standing on a victory stage talking about:
SURVIVAL.
âž»
Paul St-Pierre Plamondon:
âA referendum is an opportunity to decide for ourselves. It is an act of democracy. It is up to no one but us, as a people, to determine our national future.â
And then:
âIt is a question of survival.â
âž»
Okay.
That deserves considerably more attention than another slogan.
Because Quebec just elected a minority government.
That is a mandate to govern.
It is not automatically a mandate to break up the country.
âž»
But donât ignore the rest of the map.
The Quebec Conservatives also emerged as a serious force.
So PSPP now has to govern with a strong federalist opposition on both sides of him.
âž»
And Ottawa?
The Liberals should not expect Pierre Poilievreâs Conservatives to quietly help them manage a national-unity crisis.
And I genuinely hope they donât.
That makes this considerably more complicated than one election-night speech.
âž»
Those are two very different things.
And this is exactly where Canadian politics gets weird.
Federally, we are being told:
CANADA STRONG.
Buy Canadian.
Build Canadian.
Stand together.
Reduce our dependence on the United States.
Strengthen east-west trade.
One Canadian economy.
âž»
Meanwhile, one of the most consequential provincial election results in the country has put sovereignty right back in the middle of the conversation.
Not quietly.
Not theoretically.
As a question of âsurvival.â
âž»
So I have questions.
What exactly is supposedly facing extinction?
The French language?
Quebec culture?
Quebec political autonomy?
Or Quebecâs future inside Canada?
âž»
Because those are not the same argument.
And if we are genuinely entering an era where Canadian unity is supposed to matter more than it has in decadesâŠ
then perhaps Ottawa should spend a little less time branding the country as strong and a little more time asking why a serious political movement believes leaving it is necessary for survival.
âž»
That seems like a fairly important question.
Canada Strong?
Maybe.
But somebody should probably check whether everyone still agrees on the Canada part first.
Clarity is Courage.
Share my Cookies đȘđȘ
#JamesSeesIt
Is she being serious right now? đ€
This might be one of the most spectacularly out-of-touch things I have ever heard from someone talking about heavy industry.
âž»
Canadian steelmakers lose access to a massive chunk of their traditional U.S. market because of a trade war and 50% tariffsâŠ
And the answer is essentially:
MAKE DIFFERENT STEEL.
âž»
Oh. Okay.
Well why didnât anyone at Arcelor Mittal - Dofasco, Algoma, Stelco or the rest of the industry think of that? đ
âž»
Just CHANGE THE STEEL.
Easy.
Apparently a steel mill is like changing the flavour at Dairy Queen.
Today we make automotive sheet.
Tomorrow?
Defence steel.
Structural sections.
Housing products.
Whatever Canada happens to need.
Just turn the big steel making knob over to:
DIFFERENT.
âž»
Except that is not remotely how heavy manufacturing works.
Different steel products can mean different chemistries, grades, rolling equipment, finishing lines, heat treatment, quality systems, customer approvals, certifications, tooling, capital investment and years of market development.
And automotive steel is especially demanding.
âž»
You donât just wake up Monday morning and tell a mill built around supplying one of the most integrated automotive markets on Earth:
âGuys, trade negotiations arenât going particularly well. Can you make something else?â
âž»
This is exactly why government and industry so often speak completely different languages.
Government thinks in announcements.
Industry thinks in furnaces, equipment, metallurgy, throughput, customers, specifications, approvals and billions of dollars of sunk capital.
âž»
Could Canadian steelmakers diversify?
Of course.
They already do.
âž»
Should Canada create more domestic demand for Canadian steel?
Absolutely worth discussing.
âž»
But presenting a major industrial transition as though steel companies simply need to develop âdifferent types of steelâ skips over the hardest part:
THE ENTIRE INDUSTRIAL PROCESS BETWEEN THE IDEA AND THE PRODUCT.
âž»
You donât fix a trade problem by pretending a blast furnace is a Keurig.
And this, right here, is why people who have actually worked around heavy industry sometimes listen to government talking about manufacturing and just stare at the screen.
Itâs like watching a squirrel đżïž
Play chicken đ
With a Fân Freight Train đ
âž»
Because somewhere between Ottawa and the mill floorâŠ
reality got lost.
Clarity is Courage.
Share my Cookies đȘđȘ
#JamesSeesIt
Iâm sorry.
I cannot read this without hearing Matt Stone and Trey Parker somewhere in the distance warming up the South Park theme. đ
âž»
Donald Trump has announced the creation of the:
SUPER INTELLIGENCE FORCE.
The acronym?
SIF.
Because apparently âAI task forceâ just wasnât dramatic enough.
âž»
And then, because subtlety has clearly left the building, he says this whole thing is:
âbigger than the Industrial Revolution, and the Internetâ
according toâŠ
âmany say.â
Ah yes.
The legendary many.
Always nearby.
Never available for comment.
Somehow permanently standing just off camera confirming every enormous claim in modern politics. đ
âž»
Hereâs the funny part:
AI actually IS a massive deal.
Potentially civilization-changing.
Economically disruptive.
Politically disruptive.
Workplace disruptive.
Security disruptive.
Probably one of the biggest technological shifts most of us will ever live through.
âž»
So there is a serious conversation to be had here.
But the second you call it the:
SUPER INTELLIGENCE FORCE
my brain stops hearing public policy and starts seeing a South Park command centre where Randy Marsh is wearing a headset, Cartman has somehow secured a federal contract, and everyone is screaming because ChatGPT isâŠ
âTaking our jobs!â
âž»
Thatâs the problem.
Reality keeps drifting into satire.
And Matt and Trey keep looking less like comedians and more like cultural prophets.
âž»
Because somehow they always understood the formula:
Take a genuinely serious issue.
Add political ego.
Add bureaucratic branding.
Add panic.
Add money.
Then stand back and watch the adults make it weird.
âž»
Welcome to the Super Intelligence Force.
What could possibly go wrong? đ
Clarity is Courage.
Share my Cookies đȘđȘ
#JamesSeesIt
IâM GOING TO OUT MYSELF ON THIS ONE.
I held a grudge against Conservatives for YEARS.
Specifically Mike Harris.
That bastard crushed my dreams. đ
Because I went into Natural Resources and Environmental Science back when almost nobody gave a shit about either.
I was the environmental guy in a family of steelworkers.
The weird kid. đČđ
And hereâs the important part:
I STILL BELIEVE IN IT.
Environmental science matters.
But somewhere along the way, we started treating science like politics.
ITâS A SCIENCE, YOU FUCKING IDIOTS.
Physics doesnât vote Liberal.
Chemistry isnât Conservative.
A tonne of COâ doesnât care whose lawn sign you have.
To be fair, CHâ is different.
WHO SMELT IT, DEALT IT.
Scientific fact. đ
âž»
Which brings me to Mark Carneyâs shiny new PACIFIC LINK pipeline.
And hereâs the funny part:
I AGREE WITH THE BASIC IDEA.
Canada is ridiculously dependent on one customer for our oil.
Getting it to additional markets makes strategic and economic sense.
So build the business case.
Show me the engineering.
Show me the economics.
Show me the environmental impacts.
Show me the lifecycle emissions.
And most importantly:
SHOW ME WHO IS CARRYING THE RISK.
Because this isnât simply a pipeline.
Itâs tied to carbon capture, government participation, financing, carbon policy, Indigenous equity and private investment.
Even Pembina is protecting itself until it makes a final investment decision.
Smart.
So who holds the bag in the meantime?
Hello, taxpayer. đ
âž»
Carbon capture isnât imaginary either.
We can capture COâ from industrial emissions, compress it, transport it and inject it underground.
The question isnât whether the technology exists.
The questions are:
AT WHAT COST?
HOW MUCH ENERGY?
HOW MUCH COâ IS ACTUALLY AVOIDED OVER THE FULL LIFECYCLE?
WHO PAYS?
And does the economics still work without government support?
THAT is where science meets engineering, economics and risk management.
Politics decides what weâre willing to pay for.
Those are not the same thing.
âž»
So forget the sales pitch.
SHOW ME THE LOAD CALCULATIONS.
Show me the assumptions.
Show me what happens when those assumptions change.
Show me who gets paid.
Show me who carries the downside.
And show me where the science ends and the political decision begins.
I believed environmental science mattered when almost nobody gave a shit.
I still do.
Thatâs precisely why Iâm pissed off.
ITâS A SCIENCE.
Treat it like one.
Your move, Mark.
âž»
READ THE FULL STORY:
[LINK]
âž»
Clarity is Courage.
Forget the sales pitch. Show me the science.
Do I think this pipeline actually gets built?
Iâll quote my dad:
âNot a snowballâs chance in hell.â đ
Put two identical apples beside each other. đđ
One costs 30Âą more.
Which one are you buying?
Welcome to Grade 3 economics.
Watch where people are willing to put THEIR OWN MONEY.
That usually tells you more than the press conference.
âž»
Share my cookies. đȘđȘ
And if someone tells you the 30Âą-more apple is cheaper because the government helped pay for itâŠ
Congratulations.
Youâre starting to understand Canadian economics. đ
Iâm not here to deliver the news. Iâm trying to help people ask better questions:
https://t.co/J8MsowsnX5
#JamesSeesIt #ShareMyCookies #ClarityIsCourage #CanadianEnergy #EnvironmentalScience #RiskManagement
This guy is a one-man wrecking ball. đ
Ruin B.C. - CHECK.
Blame Ottawa - CHECK.
Blame Trump - CHECK.
Now stand up to the oil and gas companies - CHECK.
âž»
But somebody please explain this to me like Iâm five.
We have modern double-hulled tankers, vastly improved navigation, monitoring and spill-response technology, and tankers already moving up and down the Pacific coast every day.
Yet on B.C.âs north coast, Canada legally prohibits large tankers carrying crude or persistent oil from loading or unloading at Canadian ports.
âž»
Meanwhile, Alaska exists.
So apparently an oil tanker passing the B.C. coast is acceptableâŠ
It just becomes environmentally terrifying if the oil came from CANADA. đ€š
âž»
And if the alternative is eventually moving more Canadian energy through increasingly remote northern routes, somebody explain the emergency-response logic to me there.
Because if shit hits the fan in ice, tundra and hundreds of kilometres of nowhere, response doesnât exactly get EASIER.
âž»
I keep hearing what weâre against.
Trump.
Pipelines.
Tankers.
Oil companies.
Cool.
What exactly are we FOR?
Bueller?
Bueller? đ
Clarity is Courage
Share my Cookies đȘđȘ
#JamesSeesIt
PEOPLE ARE ALWAYS ASKING ME:
âOkay James⊠what do we actually DO about these problems?â
Fair question.
But before we can fix anything, we have to understand what the actual problem is.
And thatâs harder than it sounds. đ€š
âž»
I started with a three-minute video.
Propane cylinder on fire. đ„
Most people see:
HOLY SHIT. FIRE.
My brain sees:
Fire.
Pressure vessel.
Crowd.
No exclusion zone.
Garbage.
Waterway.
Environmental exposure.
Then I ask the question that matters:
WHY DOES NOBODY THERE SEEM SURPRISED BY ANY OF THIS?
âž»
Thatâs where the investigation changes.
Because one of the most dangerous things Iâve encountered in 30 years isnât stupidity.
Itâs NORMALIZATION.
Do something wrong enough times without consequence and eventually it stops feeling wrong.
Safety people call it:
NORMALIZATION OF DEVIANCE.
âž»
And suddenly Iâm not investigating a propane cylinder anymore.
Iâm asking:
What conditions allowed this?
What controls failed?
What behaviour became normal?
What changed?
And WHY?
Then you try to prove yourself wrong.
Otherwise youâre not investigating.
YOUâRE DECORATING AN OPINION.
âž»
That rabbit hole eventually took me from a burning propane cylinderâŠ
to garbage and waterwaysâŠ
to illegal dumping in CanadaâŠ
to enforcementâŠ
to population growthâŠ
to civic assimilationâŠ
and ultimately to government accountability.
Because whether weâre managing a workplace or a country, the principles donât magically change.
Communicate expectations.
Ensure understanding.
Reinforce them.
Enforce them.
Measure whether the controls actually work.
âž»
Thatâs the lesson.
People keep asking:
âWHAT CAN WE DO?â
First?
UNDERSTAND THE PROBLEM PROPERLY.
Because if you misunderstand the root cause, you can spend an enormous amount of money fixing somethingâŠ
and still have the same fucking problem.
đ FOR THE FULL LESSON:
https://t.co/J8MsowsnX5
âž»
Clarity is Courage.
You cannot manage a risk you refuse to properly identify.
Share my Cookies. đȘđȘ
This rabbit hole starts with a propane cylinder on fire.
Trust me.
It gets weird. đ
#JamesSeesIt #ClarityIsCourage #RiskManagement #RootCauseAnalysis
Apparently the Atlantic Ocean changes the sales pitch.
Two weeks ago, Mark Carney stood before the European Parliament welcoming the idea of Canada becoming the EUâs first âassociate member,â calling deeper Canada-Europe integration an âalliance for the future.â
Meanwhile, across the pond, British Prime Minister Andy Burnham merely reopened the question of whether the UK might someday rejoin the EU - and Nigel Farage reacted like someone had just handed him a campaign contribution.
The Brexit question remains politically potent enough that Farage told a Doncaster rally:
âHe might just have given me the biggest boost in my career Iâve ever had. Thank you Andy if youâre watching.â
Same European Union.
Very different brochure depending on which side of the Atlantic youâre standing on. đ
Clarity is Courage
Share my Cookies đȘđȘ
#JamesSeesIt
Does anyone else hear Alanis Morissette singing quietly in the background?
Yesterday, Mark Carney stood in Fort McMurray and declared:
âWe will build Canadian, we will use Canadian steel, with Canadian workers, trained by Canadian unions.â
Today: LNG Canada confirms its $33-billion Phase 2 expansion will use Chinese-fabricated steel components.
But one day apart?
đ¶ Isnât it ironic⊠đ
You couldnât schedule the punchline better if you tried.
Clarity is Courage
Share my Cookies đȘđȘ
#JamesSeesIt
WELL, THAT ESCALATED QUICKLY. đ€š
This morning I wrote a profanity-laced rant that somehow started with a lineup at Costco and ended with one question:
If Canada has the people, resources, steel, energy and work that needs doing⊠why arenât we building more of it here?
A few hours later:
LNG Canada confirms major Phase 2 modules will again be fabricated in China.
Apparently I didnât need a crystal ball.
I needed to wait until after lunch. đ
I THINK IâM STARTING A NEW SERIES.
There are plenty of serious political issues worth arguing about.
This isnât one of them.
Sometimes somebody just says something so spectacularly dumb that it deserves to be preserved for future generations. đ
And Doug Ford has graciously volunteered to go first.
âž»
On September 3, Doug was in Mississauga announcing up to $401 million tied to housing development charges. Podium? Check. Cameras? Check. Government livestream? Check.
Reporters?
Ahhh⊠shit. Forgot those.
âž»
As he wrapped things up, Ford actually said:
âThank God we donât have the media. No questions, no answers, weâre good to go.â
He later explained that the comment was âtongue-in-cheek.â
And you know what, Doug?
I believe you.
Nothing says âjust kiddingâ quite like holding a press conference without the press. đ
âž»
I donât care what party you belong to. Left, right, centre, politician, celebrity - if you say dumb shit in public and I can produce the receiptâŠ
you might get a poster.
This could be fun. đ€Ł
Clarity is Courage.
Share my cookies. đȘđȘ
#jamesseeit
I THINK WEâRE FIXING THE WATER DAMAGE WHILE IGNORING THE HOLE IN THE ROOF.
Mark Carney responded to the Stelco layoffs by pointing at Trumpâs tariffs and saying:
âTHEREâS MONEY ON THE TABLE.â
But Cleveland-Cliffs CEO Lourenco Goncalves says money isnât the problem.
CUSTOMERS ARE.
âNo amount of moneyâ fixes it.
His point is brutally simple:
âThereâs only one solution. We need to be able to export.â
âž»
And heâs not alone.
KPMG surveyed 275 Canadian manufacturers.
61% said they CANNOT SURVIVE without access to the U.S. market.
42% have moved production south or are considering it.
57% have reduced, paused or cancelled capital investment.
Meanwhile, Canadian businesses are pointing at tariffs, trade uncertainty, taxes, operating costs and regulatory barriers.
And Canadian steel producers are STILL fighting dumped foreign steel.
STEEL DUMPING IS REAL.
I worked in steel.
I come from a family of steel workers.
Canada has been investigating this shit for decades.
âž»
So look at the whole roof:
Not enough domestic customers.
Dumped imports.
Regulatory barriers.
Higher costs.
Lost investment.
And uncertainty around access to our largest export market.
THOSE ARE THE HOLES.
Trumpâs tariffs are the rainstorm.
And yes, you deal with the water damage.
Loans.
Relief.
Worker supports.
But eventually somebody has to FIX THE FUCKING ROOF.
Because Canada is an export economy.
You cannot replace customers with subsidies.
You cannot replace geography with a press release.
And taxpayers cannot keep buying new drywall every time it rains.
âž»
Clarity is Courage.
You canât solve the right problem until youâre willing to identify the real one.
Share my cookies. đȘ
Before somebody subsidizes those too.
âž»
For full story:
https://t.co/J8MsowsnX5
#JamesSeesIt #CanadianBusiness #Manufacturing #Stelco #Trade #CanadaUS
THIS ONE HITS HOME.
Stelco is indefinitely idling its cold-rolled and coated operations at Hamilton Works.
Up to 500 employees could be affected across Hamilton and Lake Erie.
For Hamilton, this isnât just another restructuring.
THIS IS STELCO.
Steel helped build that city.
Generations of families made their living there.
My family made a living there.
And the lesson from Hamiltonâs industrial north end was pretty simple:
YOU HAVE TO MAKE THINGS.
And the people making them have to be able to compete.
âž»
This didnât start with Trump.
Or Carney.
Or Trudeau.
Or Harper.
Canadian steelmakers have been warning governments about dumping and unfair competition for more than 30 years.
Different governments.
Different countries.
Different trade agreements.
Same warning.
Eventually, the spreadsheet wins.
Production gets cut.
Investment stops.
And people lose jobs.
âž»
Thatâs why this Mark Carney comment hits differently today:
âHOW MUCH STEEL DO YOU USE THESE DAYS, TODD?â
Wrong question.
You probably donât buy galvanized steel at Costco.
But you use steel ALL DAY.
Cars.
Bridges.
Buildings.
Factories.
Energy.
Rail.
Defence.
The electrical grid.
Steel is the economy underneath the economy.
âž»
Iâm not blaming todayâs Stelco announcement on one politician.
The receipts donât support that.
This problem crosses governments and decades.
But before making enormous decisions about Canadaâs future, our leaders should understand the history of the industries those decisions touch.
Because once foundational industries disappear, you donât rebuild them with a press conference.
âž»
Today, another piece of Hamiltonâs steel history goes quiet.
And there are hundreds of families behind that sentence.
That part isnât funny.
âž»
CLARITY IS COURAGE.
Before you change something, understand what youâre changing.
Learn its history.
Listen to the people doing the work.
Understand what happens when you pull one lever.
Sometimes the most expensive lesson is discovering the value of something after youâve lost it.
Share my cookies. đȘđȘ
If you want to know how a generational steel worker thinks, read the full story:
https://t.co/J8MsowsnX5
#Stelco #Hamilton #CanadianSteel #CanadianManufacturing #MadeInCanada