@andy_buksterlin@The1stIvoryDove@FoxNews Do you gloss over the fact that the child could be raised in a different country and still be eligible to be the US president? Why aren't you hung up on this?
@NateHasAHandle@NickJFreitas If it says what you think it does then all native Americans were born citizens. The fact they were not and the reasons for it are the same for any alien that has allegiance to their home nation.
@ksorbs Problem is that this can be understood both ways. All ambassadors/ministers are foreigners/aliens. I take it the same way you do but some people do not understand a comma means or not just and.
@JoshEakle They most likely know it better than you do and that is why they dismiss your attempts to alter what they words actually mean. All it says is that the feds can not endorse 1 Christian sect over any of the others nor infringe on anyone's right to worship as they see fit.
@_patient_man@cremieuxrecueil State owned/managed land is the Islamic way. Can't pay the taxes and the state takes your land is the way for them to own/manage the land as they do under Sharia law.
@TrevvyTrev@Kandi8907@J3NN4J@constans The law says it is up to the administration and neither you or the courts get to second guess their judgment. What doesn't matter is your twisted view of the law.
@TraitortR@DavidOfford8@scichadelic@JRAzeltine@CNN Nothing to do with if there are abortions or not but everything to do with SCOTUS overruling SCOTUS as you said never happens. No fantasy at all just the proper way to challenge SCOTUS. You really are not very good at this.
@TraitortR@DavidOfford8@scichadelic@JRAzeltine@CNN No it isn't possible but you sure do like your fantasies. Not even SCOTUS decisions are final and indefinitely binding. Roe V wade ring any bells? The inferior courts are being overturned more than usual.
@TraitortR@DavidOfford8@scichadelic@JRAzeltine@CNN Yes SCOTUS can be challenged. All it takes is for the constitution to be amended in words that define exactly what will be changed. The inferior courts weigh in but they never have the final say in anything. There are 3 kings in government and offices created by them are below.
@TraitortR@DavidOfford8@scichadelic@JRAzeltine@CNN Yes he is and equality is what it is all about. No inferior office can be at the same level as the 3 branches. Constitutional authority to interpret the constitution is reserved for the 3 branches with SCOTUS having the final say.
@ReichlinMelnick@DHSGenCounsel The decision is not up to anyone but the executive so pound sand. When the inferior court has the authority to grant it then they can determine when it ends.
@Scott_Wiener SCOTUS just rightly informed you the courts have no say and never have. The courts did not enact the temporary status and have no authority to say when it ends.
@TraitortR@DavidOfford8@scichadelic@JRAzeltine@CNN Nope I have admitted as much but that does not make them equal to the 3 branches which is what you refuse to comprehend. If your stats were true Trump would not be winning 90% of the cases. None of the 3 branches can create a body with equal power to themselves.
@RepDianaDeGette If you are armed you are safe just as the founders intended. There is nothing common sense about infringing on the right to defend yourself.