So I just read through this thing and it appears Judicial Watch dropped the Ball and owes this FBI an apology … bigly
This FD-302 form page is what Judicial Watch used to claim that Thomas Crooks emailed local law enforcement before the assassination attempt.
In it, a college instructor (someone who taught or oversaw Crooks in an academic program) is being interviewed by the FBI.
The instructor mentions they only had two email exchanges with Crooks — and both were about normal course work (syllabus stuff, assignments, etc.).
There is zero mention of any police officer, deputy, sheriff’s office, or law enforcement contact in that interview.
Judicial Watch had also included a separate cover sheet in the same file that listed “interviews of 5 Deputies” from Butler County — but that sheet is just paperwork. It doesn’t contain any emails or quotes from Crooks at all.
Basically, because everything was blacked out with privacy redactions, Judicial Watch (and a lot of people who read the headline) assumed the person emailing Crooks was a deputy. They weren’t. It was just a college instructor talking about class stuff.
Basically, Judicial Watch turned a boring, routine interview with one of Crooks’ college instructors into a dramatic “he emailed the cops!” fake headline.
The FBI in this case is correct..
@FBI_Response@JudicialWatch@FBIDirectorKash
Notably, Steyer is not gaining more than Becerra in GOP or purple county votes. Becerra is gaining more in places like Riverside and Orange, while Steyer is gaining more in Santa Clara and Los Angeles. Why would Democrat voters behave so differently depending on whether they are in a red or blue county?
Sitting down?
There are at least 165 NGOs in California that handle $100 million per year dedicated to voter registration and elections.
Helping Democrats steal elections and American taxpayers are paying for it.
Not a single penny of taxpayer money should go to NGOs.
Sick.
This is a CLICK BAIT LIE by @JudicialWatch which is now nothing more than the fake news media!
The unredacted documents are interviews of Thomas Crooks' by COLLEGE INSTRUCTORS, NOT cops, wherein those instructors reference to having emailed Thomas Crooks about COURSE WORK. They make NO references to contact between Thomas Crooks and ANY police department.
Maybe if you spent more time on Facts instead of clicks you wouldn’t be a laughing stock.
He paid his own way so that he could honor our war dead and teach his children the accurate lessons of history leftist filth like you would deny them in the classroom.
Just when I think the so-called profession of "journalism" could not stoop any lower, you surprise me.
He is a sociopath and he cares about nothing. I interviewed him and have no idea who he is. I can’t say that about anyone else. The question is why is that attractive to people
Caricature from 1892...
Up until around 1927, many books can be found — mainly written by members of the medical profession — that clearly criticized vaccination.
At that time, it was still common practice to vaccinate only once, and a detoxification (“elimination” or “cleansing”) treatment was always carried out afterward. Today, even infants receive six-in-one vaccinations, and hardly anyone even knows anymore what detoxification is.
This is absolutely accurate.
Keep in mind, all of this California stuff happened after Eric Holder was hired by CA as legal counsel for the network they were creating that linked the Secretary of State office to the DMV offices [Moter Voter].
All of that was predicated on the change that allows CA to give Drivers Licenses to illegal aliens.
Ultimately, put the two issues together and that's the source of the ballots.
Here's how it works.
Illegal Alien gets Driver License. The flag that represents a checkbox on voter eligibility is nulled during transmission to the Secretary of State [Go check, and you will see]. The SoS office gets the voter data file from the DMV and generates a ballot.
Those ballots can be mailed, or isolated for alternate completion and use as needed.
That's actually how the process works. The fraud is very easy to understand. Go check the system and you will find the evidence. It's not complicated.
California is a communist state who picks the winners they want in each election.
The illusion of an election is just that, an illusion.
They use the drop boxes on the streets to stuff as many fake ballots as they need to choose the Democrat commie they want.
If that’s not enough, they’ll make up as many fake ballots as they need in the month that they’re “counting” ballots.
Their so-called elections might as well be in North Korea.
Nithya Raman already gave a concession speech.
Think about that.
Not even she believed it was possible to make the top 2.
But greedy machine Dems are still pumping her fake votes to get Spencer out of the top 2.
Insane levels of fraud.
The reason ID is banned in California (and New York) elections is to enable large-scale fraud.
When you combine no ID and mail-in voting, fraud is de facto legalized.
This community note is stupid. @ByronDonalds is simply stating the obvious: he’s light-years ahead of the other Republican “challengers” in the primary and has President Trump’s endorsement. This race is all but over. The other candidates should stop wasting time and money and rally behind the inevitable nominee.
The election fraud in California used to fly more under the radar b/c Republican candidates weren’t even close.
But now that Dems are allowing entire cities to burn down, Republican candidates have strong chances.
Which forces Dems to commit laughable amounts of fraud to still show a Dem “winning”.
The California election fraud currently taking place in Los Angeles is waking up an entirely different demographic to the experience the rest of us had in 2020.
Democrats cheat. Democrats have no shame about cheating.
You either have the will to stop them or they take power.