@God_Questioner Incorrect, from a scientific position it is literally a living human being that is the offspring of the mother and father, thus being an existing child.
@roronoazor85853@CryptoCowboy101@TaymiApologia That’s also an assumption because the trinity position accounts for that verse. The I Am verse is actually far more of a direct proof of Jesus claiming to be God than what you just provided
@IXVegas@ClintRegert@V9224ari@BellaBaddie__ What an arrogant response. Literally every law is premised off an ought claim which is in the domain of morality. 😂😂😂 You saying abortion should be allowed and that it’s better to murder disabled people is a moral claim. So why can’t I argue moral claims again? 😂😂😂😂
@Goofyrexy@ClintRegert@BellaBaddie__ Hahahaha I use the word ironically to describe non disabled people being completely idiotic in their thinking. Also are you saying you don’t believe humans have a moral value?
@Aviationist10@xonphused 2. Now I know we used the word “evil” so perhaps we are talking past each other. I’m assuming the post and you are saying “God created sin” and we’re using evil synonymous with sin.
@Aviationist10@xonphused Yes I know but that’s why the verse is not the home run you think it is. You’re interpreting the word Ra to mean “mortal sin” when in fact that’s not what Ra means. So you’re saying “see God created sin” but no the text does not exactly say that.
@KennethMisner0@PasiRaappana@BaptistClips Well in 1 Timothy 3 the context of that verse is how the church should pick bishops and that they shouldn’t choose novices because they may not have the correct testimony. Are you a bishop and why are you teaching spiritual things from the Bible if you’re a self proclaimed novice
@Aviationist10@xonphused The original Hebrew word used is “Ra” which translates to calamity, rather than sin. The Hebrew word for sin primarily is “Chata”. Thus the verse you’re referencing is talking about God controlling disasters for punishments on the sinful. Not the actual creation of mortal sin.