@ABRadFems@preta_6 Hi @ABRadFems. The litigation does not impede or discourage any work on the social problems leading to alcoholism. The litigation is directed at the 6 month abstinence requirement, which denies transplants to Indigenous patients without any basis in science. Read the claim.
@ICampbell44@preta_6 Hi @Icampbell44. The BC Transplant doctors on the basis of the science do not support a 6 month abstinence requirement. https://t.co/EZVhkL2eNU Why oppose an improved requirement that is empirically related to transplant viability without being discriminatory?
@ICampbell44@preta_6@Icampbell44, even the Transplant Society and Health Authority admit that the scientific research does not support a 6 month abstinence requirement as a precondition for viable transplant. There is nothing woke about this science. Read the claim, Ian, read.
@ReliefBelief@preta_6 If you are looking for intelligible, @reliefbelief, I recommend Chahal et al. “End state liver disease etiology & transplantation referral outcomes of major ethnic groups in British Columbia, Canada” Medicine (2021) 100:42.
@ReliefBelief@preta_6 Did you read the claim, @reliefbelief? It is a good starting place for thinking about this challenging medical-legal policy issue. https://t.co/hhTrnBY6uL
@nationalpost I am legal counsel for UBCIC on the liver transplant discrimination claim. The filed claim is here: https://t.co/4VwIiJZtgg I urge Ms. Hamm @preta_6 and @nationalpost to read the claim and the medical journal articles supporting the claim.
@ReliefBelief@preta_6 No, @reliefbelief. The claim is founded in part on empirical research showing that a 6 month abstinence period is not efficacious in preventing post-transplant liver failure. The goal is to improve access to liver transplants for Indigenous patients: https://t.co/4VwIiJZtgg
@ICampbell44@preta_6 No, Ian. The claim is founded in part on empirical research demonstrating that the 6 month abstinence period is not efficacious in preventing post-transplant liver failure. The goal is to improve access to liver transplants for Indigenous patients: https://t.co/4VwIiJZtgg
@preta_6 This claim is not based on feelings. It is based on science and statistics. See, for example: Chahal et al. “End state liver disease etiology & transplantation referral outcomes of major ethnic groups in British Columbia, Canada” Medicine (2021) 100:42
@preta_6 Sorry to hear about your aunt, Amy @preta_6. But why does your article say that the 6 month abstinence policy was dropped in May of 1999 but applied to your aunt in 2020? @nationalpost should be fact-checking or at least cogency-checking. @CarsonJerema?
@ICampbell44@preta_6@ICampbell44. The claim is here: https://t.co/4VwIiJZtgg Read it. The claim is not virtue signalling. It is signalling a need to improve Indigenous patients' access to transplants.
@preta_6 I am legal counsel for UBCIC on the liver transplant discrimination claim. The filed claim is here: https://t.co/4VwIiJZtgg I urge Ms. Hamm @preta_6 to read the claim and the medical journal articles that empirically support the claim.
@theJagmeetSingh Force a government confidence vote on MMR proportional representation. If the vote succeeds, Canada wins. If the vote fails, @justintrudeau loses power for breaking the promise that brought him into power. Either way, your redeem the @ndp.
@SoniaFurstenau It is reasonable to demand that a Green Party MLA be appointed Minister of Environment for BC. Cross-party ministerial appointments are common for European minority governments. @Dave_Eby@bcpoli