@Redirectyourbe1 @AndrewYang I agree. The only time he WAS somewhat aggressive and stood out was when he made his response to Pete saying Trump isn’t the root of our problems.” The only time...And while I agree with him, it’s not something that will help him win over people he hasn’t already.
If @AndrewYang doesn’t get the boost he was hoping for tonight, then it will be 100% his fault. And I say that as #YangGang. We have been saying until we’ve been blue in the face that he needs to be more aggressive. And he has repeatedly not listened to us. Particularly tonight,
He polled us what we wanted to hear in the debate and “be more aggressive, butt in more” was a common thread throughout most of them. I’m not trying to hate, I absolutely love Andrew, and I want him to win. But if he doesn’t, he can look back to tonight for the answer why.
...when the stakes are higher than ever (after not even hitting close to 15% in Iowa after a month of bus touring). The fact is he didn’t bring out the gloves, which may spell a downward trend for his momentum for the first time. That is on him for not listening to us.
@ArturoForNH Another example of someone being racist:
Lady: I don't understand why somebody, a Chinaman, would come over and thinks he could run this country
Matt: He was born in New York
Lady: How did that happen? How did he end up being born over here?
🤦♂️
@AnaKasparian Considering that an individual would have to buy $120,000 worth of items before the extra costs associated with a VAT “use up” their UBI, it’s NOT regressive. This is not an either/or situation, so don’t take what Dave said out of context. Yang is fighting for BOTH.
Dems: "We have to get Trump out of the White House."
Me: "Yes, and Yang can do that."
Dems: "I don't like Yang because he pulls Trump supporters!"
Me: 👀...🤦����♂️
#MATH