I get they’re trying to establish a contrast on how Clark handles a jobber compared to Henshaw… but they lean way too hard into being “cutesy” with this, when Superman usually doesn’t beat around the bush when it comes to crime.
@Fenrirtheicewo1 I know superheroes are kind. But this is taking it to extreme levels.
He's faster than a speeding bullet, and he has to politely ask the criminal to stop her misdeeds?
This is a show for preschoolers.
See this is the kind of thing that pisses me off. I watched the series expecting it to be about different mental issues, with the characters being complex and a story reason why people with issues appear together
But then the twists are all "this one is trans, this is "non binary", these two are lesbians, this one is a repressed lesbian", so essentially no exploration of complex mental issues, just pure "representation" bullshit, and them being there is totally random so that means that half a dozen people just randomly happened to all be lgbt somehow
I liked most of the series and part of the ending, but another part of it is pure example of wokism interfering with writing
The claim that “rape did not exist among native nations prior to white contact” is ahistorical garbage pushed by third worldist ideologues who need the West to be uniquely evil.
The “noble savage” was never real. He was a blood soaked warrior, slaver, and rapist just like every other human who ever lived outside the slow, brutal discipline of civilization.
Pre-Columbian Americas had constant intertribal war, captive taking, slavery, and empires built on mass human sacrifice. Some groups punished adultery with gang rape. Raiding parties seized women as spoils. Mesoamerican civilizations ran on coercion and sexual dominance.
Rape is a human universal tied to power, lust, and tribal competition. The idea that only “white contact” introduced it is the most condescending racism imaginable, stripping indigenous peoples of agency and full humanity to score points in a decolonization fanfic.
History to leftists is some false morality play where non-Western societies were peaceful egalitarians and the West invented sin.
But the noble savage myth is dead. And we’re not playing this bullshit game anymore.
The thought process of people like John C. Reilly goes like this:
- I have beliefs.
-My beliefs are empathetic.
-Empathy is the ultimate good.
-If your beliefs contradict mine, you must lack empathy.
-You are therefore evil.
And so they weaponize the word empathy to mark their opponents as evil, despite the fact that their beliefs are almost always shortsighted, contradictory, self-serving, and even vile at times.
That’s why most of us think “empathy” is a trap.
@spartanx93@El_Krypto_Arg Pero tú no rebatiste que sea mala adaptación.
Tu solo le dijiste que al no reconocer a Venom como antihéroe mejor solo admitiera que no le gusta el personaje.
Que ni siquiera es lo que dijo.
@spartanx93@El_Krypto_Arg Tu no aceptaste la opinión de ese sujeto.
Es más, lo confrontaste.
Casi como si el que prefiera a Venom como villano, incluso uno malo como Topher, fuese un crimen.
@spartanx93@El_Krypto_Arg De nuevo. Nadie está diciendo que Venom nunca ha sido un antihéroe. Solo se expreso de que lo prefiere como villano.
Tanto te arde esa opinión que tienes que sacar cómics para demostrar algo que nadie está debatiendo?
@Fenrirtheicewo1 During the first season? I believe it.
After that? not much.
But that is the issue with prequels. They often retcon a lot of stuff.
His father is a more clear example of that.
@spartanx93@El_Krypto_Arg El tipo solo dijo que prefiere a Venom más como villano que como antihéroe.
Mejor di directamente que no soportas otras opiniones y ya.
In Obsession, the story isn’t saying “women can’t make men happy” or anything like that. It’s actually about obsession, control, and the illusion of wish-fulfillment.
The “wish” element in the film isn’t framed as a solution to emotional problems, it’s a narrative device that shows:
how desire can distort relationships,
how trying to “force” happiness backfires,
and how unhealthy attachment leads to harm for everyone involved.
So the moral is closer to:
You can’t manufacture love or emotional stability through control or shortcuts.
Not:
one gender can or can’t make another happy.
The movie is really about psychological breakdown and consequences of obsession, not a statement about men vs women.
@VladimirLuan240@kevinpf81@Miwut_ouo Tu le faltaste al respeto primero, al tomar lo que dijo y retorcerlo para llamarlo transfobico.
Asumes lo peor de él, y te sorprende que él haga lo mismo contigo.
De verdad que te falta madurez.
@VladimirLuan240@kevinpf81@Miwut_ouo Aquí no estás salvando vidas, ni mejorando la tuya, por llamar a alguien transfobico solo porque exigió tener más respeto a la bandera.
Solo te hace ver desesperado.
@VladimirLuan240@kevinpf81@Miwut_ouo Si tus "grandes problemas" son post de X, en la cual ni siquiera mencionan a tu grupo, te sugiero que empieces a revaluar tus "problemas".