Jayden Neels

[Jamil Jivani @jamiljivani]

We should never accept a political culture in which politicians have to answer questions about NOT attending events like this. Those who attend should be the ones answering questions.

[JD Vance @JDVance]

Henry Nowak died the same way a civilization dies: abandoned, handcuffed by authorities who neither trusted nor cared for him, and accused of hate crimes he did not commit. His murder is as tragic as it is enraging. He should still be alive today, and he would be if the last few generations of European elites had stood their ground against the politics of self-hatred and the mass invasion of migrants, many of whom despise the West and the people who love it.

Henry was far from the first to so needlessly lose his life, and I fear he won’t be the last. Each time a life like his is lost, the proper response—the only response—is righteous anger. One of the most important things the Trump administration has proven to the world is that stopping the flow of mass migration and defending national sovereignty is a matter of political will and leadership. Anything else is an excuse.

It is because we love the West that we want to preserve it. We love our civilization. We love our country. We love our children. And nobody—nobody—should ever die the way that Henry Nowak died. May God comfort those who loved him, and may God rest his soul.

[Kerry-Lynne Findlay @KerryLynneFindl]

Kerry-Lynne Findlay announces major upgrades to Highway 1 on Vancouver Island as a key part of the Western Alliance vision to expand transportation corridors, strengthen interprovincial trade, and build energy infrastructure across the West. Highway 1 is a vital part of the national Trans-Canada Highway system and must be upgraded. Here is exactly what we will deliver 1/5

[mistersunshinebaby @mrsunshinebaby]

🚨 Kerry-Lynne Findlay will most probably become the next Premier of British Columbia.

This is a win for real, principled, honest, conservatism.

She will need a team of advisors that keep her on track, do not suggest she panders to the left to win votes, remind her of her campaign promises, and that real conservatism (not libertarianism rebranded as conservatism) wins.

[Kerry-Lynne Findlay @KerryLynneFindl]

ANNOUNCEMENT

Kerry-Lynne Findlay just announced the 'Western Alliance' - a bold 5-pillar plan to build what Ottawa never could for BC, Alberta and Saskatchewan.

"The West has built this country. Prosperity will be delivered. The Western Alliance is my commitment."

Here is exactly how we deliver it 1/5

[Geoff Russ 🍁 @GeoffRuss3]

W.A.C. Bennett was “something very close to a head of state in his own right—a kind of provincial warlord” and “the single most powerful figure in his provincial bailiwick.”

Like Maurice Duplessis and others, Bennett ruled his province as an all-powerful boss—and rightfully so. Importantly, he understood that the more infrastructure his government controlled and the more enterprise he attracted to B.C., the more powerful and autonomous his province would become.

Those seeking to undo the damage and presence of the NDP will have to ruthlessly wield power, as Bennett did.

My latest for @WDiminishment.

https://t.co/Rj5bSD7zDS

[Michael Knowles @michaeljknowles]

PREACH!

[Keean Bexte @TheRealKeean]

🟢 IMPORTANT UPDATE ON THE JUNO DEBATE:

Caroline Elliott initially committed to attend the only BC Conservative leadership debate taking place before the membership cutoff.

This is the moment members will decide who becomes the next Premier of British Columbia. It is a big deal.

Then things took a turn.

After agreeing to the date, format, and venue, Elliott’s campaign went ahead and bought out nearly every ticket to the venue. General admission was $50, VIP was $100. They cleared it out. Deep pockets. Impressive, I guess.

We weren’t going to let one campaign control the audience, so we moved the debate to a larger venue. Every campaign deserves a fair crowd.
No issue there.

At that point, Elliott backed out, and announced a mix & mingle event on the other side of the province.

This isn’t simply a matter of avoiding other candidates like Yuri Fulmer, Iain Black, Kerry-Lynne Findlay, Warren Hamm, or Peter Milobar. Campaigns make strategic decisions all the time.

This is about attempting to control access to voters, lighting a pile of cash on fire, then walking away when that failed.

We’re proceeding with the debate.
Elliott is welcome to reconsider. She will be treated fairly and given the same opportunity as everyone else.

But right now, voters are left with a simple question: Why try to block people from attending a debate?

If I were a donor, I’d want an answer to that.

And if this is how a campaign handles a debate, it raises bigger questions about how they would handle power

Every other candidate will be given a powerful, national platform to showcase their talent and ideas. Elliott is welcome to change her mind, again, and show up for the people that matter: people like you.

The Juno News audience is the largest in the nation, and are the only stakeholders in this whole leadership race that I actually care about. Our readers deserve to hear from the people that want to lead Canada's west coast out of years of NDP destruction.

I am excited, the cast of talent in this race is impressive, and I hope to see you there.

https://t.co/ASIv3jjFWH.

[QuickDickMcDick 🇨🇦 @QuickDickMcDick]

Hear me out here - MULTIPLE high speed rail lines.

Have them running to East/West coasts.

But make them underground.

And shape them like a tube.

And don't put trains or people in them - put crude and nat gas in the fucking things

[Natasha Montreal @NatashaMontreal]

I will keep saying this as many times as I need to before I am sent to the thought crime gulag. It isn't just Islam. It's the Khalistanis too. They have cornered the trucking industry, did the biggest terrorist attack in Canadian history, they are trafficking drugs and people across North America, and they have even murdered reporters. We have Chinese police stations in Canada and Chinese Communists in our managerial regime...

Pandering to Islam is merely one symptom of a much more virulent and metastatic disease, which is the ideological capture of our managerial regime and elites.

The ideological capture happened when Marxists infiltrated our institutions, including the Church, and replaced the Church with statism. This began over 100 hundred years ago.

Prior to this time, the three spheres of influence in society were the Church, the family, and the state, with the state being the least powerful and important.

The acceleration happened from the 1950s onward. The same people who believe that a terrorist should have been rewarded $10.5 million of taxpayer compensation, also believe that it's okay that a male baby rapist is in a women's prison, near the mother and baby unit. Those are actual real world Canadian examples.

Multiculturalism and mass immigration from the third world were treasonous from the get-go. But they didn't begin in a vacuum. Pierre Elliott Trudeau was a Marxist. He went to China twice during the Communist revolution. In 1960, during a mass famine due to Communist policies he returned, extoling the virtues of China. He even wrote a book about it. He loved Castro. His wife may have loved him even more-IYKYK. PET took his children to Siberia in 1984 and said it was where the future was being made.

I have had nearly identical opinions and politics for 30 years and have been outspoken for this entire period of time. Only now are more people seeing the handwriting on the wall, when it should have been obvious from the 1960s onward.

It certainly should have been clear from the 1980s, when the Charter came in, there was the Air India bombing, and there was the Gamil Gharbi massacre at Polytechnique.

I am glad that half of real Canadians finally see how bad things are, but it may be too late to reverse course without decisive, immediate, and strong action and the Liberals have zero incentives to do so.

[Tristin Hopper @TristinHopper]

Go to church, you mopes. The whole second half of the bible is mostly about staying motivated even while Rome is actively trying to kill you.

[LHGrey™️ @Grey_0G]

As an Atheist, I offer no apology, no grovel, no limp-wristed mea culpa for the Crusades.

Quite the fucking opposite.

We didn’t go far enough.

We barely scratched the surface of that medieval death cult before it slithered back into the shadows, licking its wounds and plotting its next parasitic conquest.

And every spineless Westerner today who clutches pearls about “imperialism” or “colonialism” is just a psychological masochist, high on the opium of guilt, begging to be castrated by the very ideology that has dreamed of our extinction since the 7th century.

Let’s strip the sentimental bullshit and stare into the abyss with unflinching precision.

Before any knight ever took the cross in 1095, the Islamic juggernaut had already devoured the Christian heartlands of the Middle East and North Africa in a blitzkrieg of fire and sword...Byzantium bleeding out, Alexandria’s library ashes, Spain falling in a single generation after 711.

Charles Martel’s hammer at Tours in 732 wasn’t some quaint skirmish; it was the fucking line in the sand where rational Europe said “no more” to the caliphate’s vision of universal submission.

The Crusades were the desperate, belated counterstrike...not unprovoked aggression, but existential recoil against a supremacist theology that divides the world into Dar al-Islam...the house of slavery...and Dar al-Harb...the house of perpetual war.

Philosophy 101, you cowards:

this isn’t “Abrahamic cousins” nonsense; it’s Hobbesian war of all against all, where tolerance meets the intolerant and dies whimpering.

We failed because we stopped short.

Jerusalem retaken?

Fleeting.

Constantinople?

Lost forever in 1453 to the same Ottoman machine that would later hammer at Vienna’s gates in 1683...only Sobieski’s winged hussars and raw European will turning the tide at the last possible breath.

The psychology here is lethal and eternal:

Islam’s doctrine weaponizes the believer’s psyche into a death-cult automaton, promising paradise for butchery, while the West’s post-Enlightenment mind...drunk on Nietzsche’s slave morality inverted...now flagellates itself for daring to survive.

We internalized the enemy’s narrative, convinced ourselves the Crusaders were the villains, and now watch mosques sprout like tumors in our cities while apologists scream “Islamophobia” at the mirror.

Profound, isn’t it?

The same civilization that birthed Locke’s tolerance, Hume’s skepticism, and Darwin’s merciless truth now kneels before a 1,400-year-old blueprint for domination because admitting the threat would bruise its fragile, secular ego.

We didn’t go far enough.

We left the roots intact...Koran, Hadith, the whole supremacist architecture...seething in the soil, ready to sprout again under every migration wave and demographic Trojan horse.

Next time the pendulum swings...and history’s dialectic demands it will..:the eradication must be total, ideological, scorched-earth.

Burn the books, salt the earth of the mindset, leave no theological stone unturned.

Civilizations don’t negotiate with memetic cancers; they excise them or perish in the dar al-Harb they refused to end.

This isn’t hate.

This is the profound, venomous love of a free mind for its own fucking survival.

We apologize for nothing.

And if the West finally grows a spine, it won’t be in the name of any god...it’ll be in the name of reason that refuses to be enslaved again.

End of sermon.

The hammer waits.

🗡️💀🗡️

[Pastor Coin @pastorcoin]

This bible verse is illegal in Canada.

So I'm gonna post it everyday.

Day 2:

Leviticus 18:22
You shall not lie with a male as with a woman; it is an abomination.

[Pastor Coin @pastorcoin]

This bible verse is illegal in Canada.

So I'm gonna post it everyday.

Day 1:

Leviticus 18:22
You shall not lie with a male as with a woman; it is an abomination.

[James Lindsay, anti-Communist @ConceptualJames]

Addressing Zoomerslop.
A real Gen Z quote:
"Of all my friends, Israel is the very first thing that they want to learn about and understand, because it does go back to America First. I, in fact, have not talked to one Gen Z conservative that has been pro-Israel. Everybody I've talked to is questioning Israel."

Listen, kids. Doesn't that seem really f--king weird to you? The main thing your whole cohort cares about is another country, one that is allied with us and kicking ass in the most Top Gun way you can imagine? Doesn't it seem weird that everyone in your generation is focused on another country that isn't even attacking us?

It should seem weird because it is weird. The reason it's happening is not because Israel is relevant to all of your lives. The reason it is happening is because you're being propagandized.

Let me repeat the quote in words that hit your big brothers and sisters right in the assholes ten years ago:
"Of all my friends, privilege is the very first thing that they want to learn about and understand, because it does go back to Social Justice. I, in fact, have not talked to one Millennial liberal that doesn't question our privilege. Everybody I've talked to is questioning privilege: white privilege, male privilege, straight privilege."

Do you think that was normal? No, it wasn't normal either. Every Gen X or older person can tell you that the young people in their generations had many, varied, and diverse interests. There was no top of mind for everyone in a generation. But the Millennials got it with privilege and Social Justice, and you're getting it with Israel and "America First."

Kids, listen to me.

This is not normal.

This is not natural.

This is the result of dedicated propaganda campaigns.

You are being propagandized.

The method of propaganda being used is primarily something called "reflexivity," which is a method developed by George Soros to create mass movements of belief around deliberate lies that he called "fertile fallacies."

He called them "fertile fallacies" because they are lies (fallacies, errors, differences between what's believed and what's really true) that can take off (fertile) in a population. They're "lies with legs," it has been said.

The method of "reflexivity" is to get everyone believing the same erroneous stuff in an increasing way at the same time. This is accomplished through local media saturation: everyone is talking about the same thing in the same way at the same time, and eventually so are your friends. Then the ideas "reflect" all around you creating a sense of social consensus and widespread belief.

Reflexive campaigns are everywhere now. On the Left, we call them the "Current Thing." We have rafts of memes of the NPCs all changing their tune or saying the same thing or being reprogrammed or being hypnotized into the newest Current Thing, which changes when the media does.

That's you! Now! You're being Sorosed!

The reason everyone in your generation is suddenly talking about Israel is because propagandists in your midst have made Israel your "current thing." It is a reflexive campaign, and you aren't just a victim but are playing your part.

The framing for that reflexive campaign is "America First." The propagandists are exploiting your love of country and frustration with bad actors in our governments and their "global partners," which are increasingly being exposed, to get you attached to a bunch of fertile fallacies about Israel, all of which play upon your fears, anxieties, frustrations, and love for your beautiful country.

Here are some:
"Israel is not really our greatest ally. It isn't even an ally."
"We can't afford things at home because Israel gets aid money."
"This is Israel's War, and I'm not dying in Israel's War."
"Israel attacked the USS Liberty and isn't our friend."
"Jeffrey Epstein was working with Israel."
"Israel is too weak to exist on its own so it manipulates America into supporting it."
"Israel is a settler-colonialist project that is doing a genocide of the indigenous Palestinians." (OOPS MY BAD THAT'S THE ONE THEY'RE TELLING YOUR FRIENDS ON THE LEFT)
"Israel is a warmongering vassal state under with US protectorate status that is seeking to become a regional power by starting random wars that it drags the US into and doing genocide." (AHH THAT'S YOUR VERSION OF THE SAME LIE!)

None of these (or dozens more) is accurate. They are all fallacies (lies) designed to take off in the social and emotional environments you find yourselves in, driven by media and political propagandists who have their own agendas but need your help (just like the NPCs on the Left).

The reason you are so obsessed (and, yes, that's obsession) with Israel is because you are being targeted by reflexive propaganda campaigns designed to make you all fixate on this object that can be alleged to cause most of your problems. In fact, it causes few, if any, of your problems and is actively solving many problems you are blessed enough not to even know that you have.

Friends, you are being propagandized. You are being led to focus and fixate on these things because it serves dark interests that are not your own.

The same Soros techniques that work on the Left are being used on you, and you're helping them work.

How do you stop them?
1) Stop listening to propagandists. This is actually really important.
2) Seek out the opposite side of what you're being told and try to understand the truth.
3) Use critical thinking.
4) Ask yourself if you're being asked to think about issues or asked to feel about issues.
5) Be skeptical of something that appears suddenly in the news or on platforms that everyone is repeating all the time all at once. That's how Soros's reflexivity works.
6) Understand, just like how it was true with CNN and other trusted news sources, that trusted sources can be bought, at which point they are not trustworthy anymore and are using your trust to manipulate you.

The biggest anti-America operation that's happening right now is the sudden skeptical-to-hostile fixation on Israel. Notice that it's only been a thing since October 7, 2023, exactly the same time the parallel propaganda wave began on the Left. What you're participating in is the side of that same campaign tailored to your values, your anxieties, and your frustrations. No different.

This campaign is rapidly turning people against not just Israel and often Jews (against your values, I'm sure), but against MAGA, Trump, the United States and its role in the world, and the Republican Party. Who benefits from that? Not you. Not us.

Isn't it weird to you that so many people suddenly believe exactly the opposite of what they believed in 2022? Isn't it weird to you that everyone considers this such a big issue?

It should be weird because it is. That's the signature of a propaganda campaign, and you are its primary targets.

[Jason James @jasonjamesbnn]

Asia is facing an energy crisis as a consequence of war in Iran.

Japan is opening reserves. India is making cuts. South Korea is cut off. China is desperate.

Canada would have been the ideal solution—especially for China since it would put us in a position of maximum leverage that would allow Canada to negotiate a deal with the United States to maintain control over China's energy resources in exchange for a sweetheart trade deal with the US.

Canada would not only generate billions, even trillions in profit, but this would have put Canada in a position of global economic influence the likes of which we've never experienced.

If Justin Trudeau and the Liberals didn't handicap our energy sector.

If Mark Carney wasn't a net zero zealot.

If we had've built those pipelines connecting the BC coast to Alberta.

If BC didn't have a climate change obsessed government that shut down our ability to move tankers up the Strait of Georgia.

If Canada wasn't determined to commit green suicide.

If the leftist Liberal government didn't scare away investors with exorbitant taxes and fees.

But now instead we're sidelined as a strategic ally to a communist nation and security threat to the world empire we share a border with. Canada has nothing to offer and it was all our own doing.

[The Food Professor @FoodProfessor]

To my X followers,

I’ve worked with the media for nearly 25 years. For most of that time, the relationship was professional and balanced. But in recent years, something has shifted.

I am increasingly concerned about the state of our democracy — particularly how media, in general, are informing Canadians about food policy, food inflation, and economic policy.

I now find myself learning more about Canada’s economy and policy changes from American outlets than from Canadian ones. Much of our national coverage feels reactive, shallow, or overly fixated on partisan narratives rather than substantive policy analysis.

What troubles me most is the lack of scrutiny applied evenly across governments and institutions.

For example, when the Bank of Canada suggested that Ottawa’s counter-tariffs contributed to food inflation, only one major outlet — Bloomberg — gave it meaningful coverage. The grocery benefit program received very little examination regarding how it would be financed. It took days before anyone pressed for clarity.

During the latest spike in food inflation, several outlets turned to the same small circle of commentators who dismissed any potential role of federal policy — carbon pricing, GST holidays, counter-tariffs — despite mounting evidence that policy decisions can and do affect food prices.

Instead of investigating structural drivers of inflation, much of the coverage focuses on fact-checking opposition rhetoric, even though the opposition has not governed since 2015. Scrutiny should be applied equally — not selectively.

Quebec media, while imperfect, appear to have maintained a broader range of debate. In much of the rest of Canada, I see increasing concentration of voices — often from the same region, Ontario, often reflecting similar policy perspectives — and less diversity of thought grounded in empirical research.

This isn’t about partisan politics. It’s about accountability, transparency, and healthy democratic discourse.

Media are under financial pressure — that’s real. But public trust depends on independence and depth. Subsidy structures, incentives, and newsroom economics all matter.

Canada deserves stronger policy journalism — especially on food affordability, supply chains, and economic resilience.

We need more data-driven analysis, more intellectual diversity, and more courage to ask uncomfortable questions — regardless of which party is in power.

Until that happens, Canadians would be wise to diversify their news sources and think critically about what they’re being told — and what they’re not.

[Roman Helmet Guy @romanhelmetguy]

Ok here’s my proposal: If someone gave me the money to start a university there, every undergrad would learn the exact same thing: History & Math. One track for everyone. No electives. Why? Because if you know enough history and you know enough math, understanding anything else becomes trivial. And by teaching just a single track, this could be done for dirt cheap.

For history, the first year should just be reading 50k pages written during the Ancient period, second year 50k pages from the Medieval period, third year 50k pages from the Early Modern period, and fourth year 50k pages from the Modern period. Professors would give daily lectures to structure and synthesize the day’s readings. In the course of this history instruction, students would ofc read the theological, philosophical, and ideological works that drove much of history. And they would debate these ideas to learn rhetoric and become skillful writers and speakers.

For math, the standard math major is already somewhat decent, but there would be just one rigorous track for everyone: an intense course load that covers both theoretical and applied, and with enough probability and information theory etc to understand AI. In the course of instruction, practical applications to engineering, physics, coding etc would be taught alongside.

Anybody who went through that curriculum would be perfectly positioned to understand anything. All hard sciences are downstream of math, and all social sciences are downstream of history. With all the advances in the past 500 years, consider this my proposal for a modern trivium: a base layer of knowledge that any truly learned person must be expected to master, before going on to specialize in a specific field.

And the benefit of running a university this way is that it’s very cheap. Theoretically you could do it with just 2 professors: one for history, one for math. They could each teach 4 courses: each year’s course in a 2 hour block every day. History Year 1-4, and Math Year 1-4. Also, every upper year student is qualified to TA every lower year class. And of course, if we had the money, we could hire more professors to teach these 8 courses to reduce the workload. 4 professors teaching 2 courses each would be a nice balance.

A typical student’s day could be for example: a 2 hour block for History instruction, a 2 hour block for Math instruction, and the rest of the day for studying.

If you enrolled just 100 students a year and they each paid just $25k for tuition and board, that’s $2.5M a year to pay just 2-4 professors and maintain the handful of buildings needed.

And if we taught 100 smart students a year this way, I’m convinced they’d conquer the world. There are approximately zero people alive today who have the comprehensive knowledge of history needed to master the humanities AND the comprehensive knowledge of math needed to master STEM. They would be in a league of their own.

[Harman Bhangu @HarmanBhanguBC]

Enough is enough. What is happening in our schools is not “inclusion.” It is ideological capture. It is the state telling parents to step aside while activists experiment on their children’s moral foundation.

Let me say this as plainly as possible: no government, no school board, no tribunal has the authority to override parents when it comes to the moral formation of their children. None.

SOGI was sold as an anti-bullying tool. That was the sales pitch. But what it has become is something very different, it has become a vehicle for embedding a highly contested worldview about sex and identity directly into classrooms, while silencing anyone who questions it.

And now we are told that simply affirming biological reality can be framed as “harm.” That dissent is “discrimination.” That disagreement is “hate.” When free speech is redefined so narrowly that only one viewpoint is considered acceptable, you no longer have inclusion, this has become about ideological enforcement. If trustees, parents, or citizens risk financial ruin for speaking against government-backed social theory, then this isn’t about protecting children. It’s about protecting power.

Public institutions do not get to take sides in cultural revolutions. Schools are not the property of activist movements. They belong to families and taxpayers. Their job is to teach math, science, history, not to advance a doctrine about gender identity that many parents fundamentally reject.

And yes, parents must have absolute, non-negotiable opt-out rights. Not symbolic opt-outs. Not bureaucratic mazes. Real consent. Real authority. If a school is teaching material that touches on sexuality, gender identity, or deeply contested beliefs about human nature, parents decide. Not the state.

What we are seeing is a creeping normalization of the idea that government knows best and families should comply. I reject that outright.

This is a fight about freedom. It is a fight about who governs, citizens or bureaucrats. Parents or activists. Reality or ideology.

And I will not back down.

https://t.co/36QnsugvmB

[Tristin Hopper @TristinHopper]

Both the U.S. and Canada are simultaneously experimenting with "why don't we just kill our way out of this problem?" The Americans have simply chosen to kill drug dealers, and we've chosen to kill sick pensioners.