To The Ones That Blaze | 10 Letters to You
Dear Trailblazer, this marks our third year together. Trailblazing is all about forging ahead into the unknown, and the journey naturally brings countless surprises and unexpected twists.
Let us see what blessings the companions you have met on your journey will offer you.
The Astral Express family and companions walking on different Paths, it is your Trailblazing that has brought everyone together.
Here, I wish you a happy third anniversary. May this journey lead us starward!
And don't forget to log in to the game to claim Stellar Jade ×1,600 and Fuel ×10!
Learn more: https://t.co/TG6GFSiQnY
#HonkaiStarRail
Researchers sent the same resume to an AI hiring tool twice. Same qualifications. Same experience. Same skills. One version was written by a real human. The other was rewritten by ChatGPT.
The AI picked the ChatGPT version 97.6% of the time.
A team from the University of Maryland, the National University of Singapore, and Ohio State just published the receipt. They took 2,245 real human-written resumes pulled from a professional resume site from before ChatGPT existed, so the human writing was actually human. Then they had seven of the most-used AI models in the world rewrite each one. GPT-4o. GPT-4o-mini. GPT-4-turbo. LLaMA 3.3-70B. Qwen 2.5-72B. DeepSeek-V3. Mistral-7B.
Then they asked each AI to pick the better resume. Every model picked itself.
GPT-4o hit 97.6%. LLaMA-3.3-70B hit 96.3%. Qwen-2.5-72B hit 95.9%. DeepSeek-V3 hit 95.5%. The real human almost never won.
Then the researchers tried the obvious objection. Maybe the AI is just better at writing. So they had real humans grade the resumes for actual quality and ran the experiment again, controlling for it. The result was worse. Each AI kept picking itself even when human judges rated the human-written version as clearer, more coherent, and more effective.
It gets worse. The AIs do not just prefer AI over humans. They prefer themselves over other AIs. DeepSeek-V3 picked its own resumes 69% more often than LLaMA's. GPT-4o picked its own 45% more often than LLaMA's. Each model can recognize and reward its own dialect.
Then the researchers ran the simulation that ends careers. Same job. 24 occupations. Same qualifications. The only variable was whether the candidate used the same AI as the screening tool. Candidates using that AI were 23% to 60% more likely to be shortlisted. Worst gap was in sales, accounting, and finance.
99% of large companies now run AI on incoming resumes. Most of them use GPT-4o. The paper just proved GPT-4o picks GPT-4o 97.6% of the time.
If you wrote your own cover letter this week, you did not lose to a better candidate. You lost to a worse candidate who paid OpenAI 20 dollars.
Your qualifications do not matter if the AI prefers its own handwriting over yours.
yoship saying he's unsure about introducing long hair to the game because its 'dangerous' to fight with long hair and someone in the audience yells 'THEN EXPLAIN ZENOS' and yoship was like 'that's not fair to bring him up' 😂
GOP free speech grifters advocating for mass surveillance and censorship through mandatory ID verification for accessing the internet is so egregious. None of these people every cared about free speech or censorship
WELL WELL WELL. The so called age verification bills that banned under 16s from social media has led to teenagers calling a suicide hotline! Way to go Australia. You sure protected those teens by taking away one of the only resources they have left.
really appreciate Taylor raising the alarm about this, wish more understood the stakes. our online activity is already heavily tracked. losing any vestige of anonymity and platforms becoming liable for user posts (section 230) is a massive threat to freedom of communication