Maturing is realising that absolutely nothing of substance is happening here.
A false pressure valve is being released, to reset public anger so as to buy additional years of time to implement an agenda that was decided long ago, elsewhere. The frontman is utterly expendable.
Over 100 million people were murdered by communist regimes in the 20th century.
Not a “mistake.”
Not “poor implementation.”
A direct result of abolishing private property and concentrating all power in the state.
If you still defend the ideology, you’re either historically illiterate or morally bankrupt.
@ItsLulu_7 I refuse to believe you are a real person, but some underground communist posting propaganda 24/7, like what is your job? How can you afford to sit and post bullshit all day? You’re either fake or someone is paying you.
Russia is not looking to fight the West.
China is not looking to fight the West.
Islam is not looking to fight the West.
Arabs are not looking to fight the West.
Africa is not looking to fight the West.
Spanish/Portuguese speaking America is not looking to fight the West.
And they all get along reasonably well with each other.
The West is looking to fight everyone, and gets along with no one but Israel
This is one of the best illustrations of what socialism (in any form) does to the poor. It promises a ladder of programs & benefits but can’t lift people out of poverty. No country on earth has made the poor better off under socialist governments.
Young communists in 2026:
“I want free healthcare, free college, free housing!”
Translation: I want other people’s money and I’m willing to give the government unlimited power to get it.
What’s the most delusional part of modern communism? Reply below 👇
Yeah only White people can be British or English because we are an ethnic group.
British is the umbrella term for someone that is Scottish, English, Welsh, or Northern Irish. All of which are White.
How is that White supremacy? It’s a biological fact.
The open society and its enemy, Soros.
While he named his Open Society Foundations after Karl Popper’s “The Open Society and Its Enemies,” his project stands as a philosophical inversion of everything Popper defended.
Popper’s open society rested on critical rationalism, the recognition that no one possesses final truth, that institutions must remain open to criticism and piecemeal reform, and that democracy functions as a method for removing rulers without bloodshed.
He rejected historicism, the belief in iron laws of history that justify sacrificing present generations for a utopian future, and warned that such thinking inevitably produces closed, authoritarian societies.
Soros has repurposed the label to advance a grand project of engineered demographic transformation.
Through mass immigration, multiculturalism as official policy, and diversity mandates that prioritize group identity over individual merit and assimilation, his foundations actively dissolve the cultural continuity and social trust that make rational criticism and incremental change possible.
Popper understood that openness requires a stable framework, a shared language of reason, basic cohesion, and institutions citizens feel they collectively own.
Soros treats those foundations as obstacles to be overcome in the name of an abstract, borderless openness.
The concrete results are visible. Parallel societies that operate under different norms, public spaces where debate on the scale and selection of immigration is treated as illegitimate, and the rise of identity based hierarchies that close off dissent in the name of equity.
These are certainly not expansions of the open society, but new forms of closure, tribal in character, enforced through institutional capture rather than overt dictatorship, yet hostile to the very critical spirit Popper placed at the center of civilized life.
Philosophically, Soros replaces Popper’s falsification and humility before reality with a new historicism, the conviction that global multiculturalism and open borders represent inevitable moral progress, and that resistance from actual existing communities constitutes the new enemy.
The machinery funded in the name of openness does not test its own assumptions against evidence, it suppresses the questions.
Those who still value the ideal of an open society should read Popper on their own terms.
They will find that Soros has not extended the open society, but has supplied its most sophisticated contemporary enemies.