My response to Afzal Khan, a Labour MP, who has reported me to the parliamentary authorities for my criticism of various barbaric Islamic practices, our rape gang inquiry report and my appearance on Joe Rogan's podcast.
People asked. I answered. ๐
You wanted to know how much ivermectin paste to take.
So I made a table for you.
First, let me say this:
I know you're laughing at "horse dewormer." ๐ด
I laughed too. The first time.
Then I watched people die.
And I watched some people live.
Some of them used paste.
Now I don't laugh anymore.
The dosage (simple):
1.87% ivermectin paste.
1 gram of paste = 18.7 mg of human tablets.
You need a digital scale โ 0.01 gram accuracy. โ๏ธ
This formula is for pure ivermectin paste only.
Some brands mix it with prasiquantel. That's a different formula.
Why would anyone use horse paste?
Because in most countries, you can't get ivermectin.
Not from a pharmacy. Not from a doctor.
But you can walk into a horse supply store and buy it.
Yeah. That's how broken the system is. ๐
And for your skin?
I've seen skin cancer disappear.
People apply it. A few months later?
The cancer literally falls off.
Worst acne you've ever seen? Relief.
Fungal infections? Gone in three weeks.
So here's what I know:
โ Paste works the same as tablets โ if you measure right.
โ Rub it on your skin โ cancer spots vanish.
โ Poor people can afford this.
I'm not a doctor.
I'm just someone who saw it with my own eyes. ๐๏ธ
Believe me or don't.
But healing is always possible.
Even if it comes from a tube meant for a horse.
Follow me for more updates on important information.
Before the Crusades, two-thirds of the Christian world had already fallen under Islamic rule.
Your school probably skipped that part.
They taught you the Crusades began in 1095, as if Christians just woke up one morning and decided to march east for no reason.
But history did not begin in 1095.
By then, Islamic armies had already conquered massive portions of the Christian world:
Syria.
Egypt.
North Africa.
The Holy Land.
Spain.
In 711 AD, Islamic forces crossed into Spain.
By 732 AD, they had pushed all the way into France.
That is where Charles Martel met them at the Battle of Tours and stopped the advance into Western Europe.
Some historians consider it one of the most decisive battles in world history.
So when people talk about the Crusades without mentioning the 400 years before them, they are not giving you history.
They are giving you a narrative.
Were the Crusades complicated?
Of course.
Were Christians perfect?
No.
But the idea that the Crusades were some random act of Christian aggression is historically dishonest.
The real story begins long before 1095.
And once you know what happened before the Crusades, the entire conversation changes.
They buried this.
Now you know.
SCOTUS and Birthright Citizenship ERROR #2
SCOTUS says the history of Jus Soli establishes that everyone born on American soil regardless of parental legal status automatically becomes a citizen.
However, factually and historically, Jus Soli is a legal doctrine developed by kings and conquerors to expand political power by creating subjects.
I find it disturbingly ironic that the liberal Justices, who claim to see slavery and oppression in every corner of American history, completely overlook the genuinely feudal origins of this doctrine.
This is what happens when history and the Constitution are replaced with political mythology.
Children are born subject to their parents, not to government. Itโs a parental authority issue, not a government jurisdiction issue.
Government does not become a childโs master simply because they first draw breath within a particular border.
Even Great Britain, the very nation the majority relies upon to bind us to this feudal doctrine, has abandoned unconditional birthright citizenship.
1. Americans rejected the notion that people are born owing unconditional and perpetual allegiance to kings and governments when we declared Independence.
2. We rejected it again when we established a constitutional republic where citizenship is founded upon law, consent, and allegiance, not the accident of geography.
Now, through an astonishing ignorance of both history and constitutional principle, the majority has resurrected the very feudal philosophy our Founders rejected.
It is a political doctrine that says government owns your political allegiance from the moment of your birth, regardless of the allegiance of your parents.
That is the doctrine of kings and oppressors and therefore patently unAmerican.
If SCOTUS will, through an unfathomable depth of ignorance for political reasons, voluntarily adopt such despotism are we also going to overturn Dredd Scott in some creative but imaginative way that will become championed by the very people it once oppressed?
Every generation that abandons discernment eventually discovers the same truth: unintended consequences are monsters that never stay under your control. Eventually, they turn on their creators.
Stay tuned for Error #3
@JackStr42679640 Michigan State must return taxpayers money! Iโm 65 my husband is 75 and we can barely afford the property taxes on our 75 acre farm. He has cancer at home hospice so Iโll lose my SS and 1/2 his pension but the taxes will still increase. Complete Bullshit
ALEXANDER HAMILTON: "The influx of foreigners must, therefore, tend to change & corrupt the national spirit.
To admit foreigners indiscriminately is to invite a Trojan horse into the citadel of our liberty & sovereignty."
Dont let go of the family at the center of yesterday's Supreme Court property tax ruling.
In 1991, Scott Pung bought a small three-bedroom home on half an acre for his wife and two children. It was their family home. When Scott died in 2004, his wife stayed there. When she died in 2008, their son and his family stayed. Same home, same family, more than two decades.
The whole time, it was their primary residence, taxed at the lower rate Michigan gives a family home. Then in 2010 an assessor decided, wrongly, that they should be taxed as if it were a second home. The family took it to court and won. The tribunal ruled they did not owe it.
The assessor's response, in her own words about the judge who ruled for the family: "I don't care what he says." She imposed the tax again. She left it off the original bill and added it later. When the family came in to pay, they brought a driver's license to prove it was their home, and paid what they actually owed.
It did not matter. Over roughly $2,242 that they did not owe and had already beaten in court, the county foreclosed. A trial court tried to give the home back over a notice failure. The county appealed to stop that. In 2018, after 27 years, the family permanently lost the home Scott Pung bought in 1991.
This is what the property tax can do. Not in theory. To a real family, over a bill that was never owed, because one official decided she did not care what the court said. And the Supreme Court said the Constitution will not make that family whole.
I reached out to the Pung family, and they gave me their blessing to share their story and this photo. My thanks to them, and my respect for the fight they carried all the way to the highest court in the land. It will help families they will never meet.
This is exactly why we are working to end the tax that made it possible.
Photo of Marc and Tia Pung at the U.S. Supreme Court, shared with their permission.