For those of you who got caught in the rabbit hole, I have a fireside chat for you with Arthur van Pelt. He is one of the chief critics of the Craig Steven Wright's self-claim on having been behind the pseudonym Satoshi Nakamoto, the inventor of Bitcoin.
https://t.co/zxKFVCZccZ
@dosargenteno1@maradydd When was this photo taken? In fairness I cannot really fullty recognize the proceedings of the 1999 Benelux symposium in the photo of the bookshelf itself.
Finally, the case of a specific, and plausible match to the previously elaborated profile is presented: "Has this Princeton professor been the pseudonymous creator of Bitcoin, Satoshi Nakamoto"?
https://t.co/PWWzcGgkNg
#Bitcoin#blockchain#SatoshiRevealed
The third video "Being Satoshi Nakamoto - the mysterious creator of Bitcoin" https://t.co/vYzyUUWB3Z sketches a plausible profile of the creator of Bitcoin.
#Bitcoin#SatoshiRevealed#blockchain
Video #2 illustrates the challenge in solving this conundrum, which has resisted all investigations for about 15 years by now: "How to prove the identity of Satoshi Nakamoto - the mysterious creator of Bitcoin?" https://t.co/BtzQxGqkTH
#Bitcoin#blockchains#SatoshiRevealed
The first video might also be suitable for those who have not looked into this unparalled story, yet : "Why does the search for the origins of Bitcoin and its mysterious creator even matter?" https://t.co/OHxt45XnIF
#Bitcoin#blockchians#SatoshiRevealed
For those of you who are interested in the fascinating origins of Bitcoin, I have just released four substatial updated on my YouTube channel:
https://t.co/X6qZNEt7MN
#Bitcoin#blockchains#Satoshi#Nakamoto
@CindyWan19@ggatehouse@ggatehouse Uou might be interested in my playlist https://t.co/ue6ftUW7gi which summarises my report "Satoshi Nakamoto & the Origins of Bitcoin". Lots of topics in common with your documentary, so a chat might make sense ...
Satoshi Nakamoto & the Origins of Bitcoin
My latest YouTube video teaser
https://t.co/KqWjP24sLi
provides a whistle stop tour through the facts-based analysis of the greatest mystery in the entire history of science & technology.
We are all Satoshi!
#Bitcoin#Satoshi#Nakamoto
@maradydd @DexMarketCapApp @DerrickMah@Anon_Operation You might want to give Paul "Saltoshi" Le Roux a visit - he is alleged to have invented TrueCrypt, and might have implanted a backdoor.
@austinhill@natfriedman Respectable point of view, but searching for the truth is always a honorable scientific objective; such an effort will likely not end with a concrete name, and thus protect Bitcoin's beautiful origin myth, and clearly reveal who is NOT Satoshi Nakamoto.
@jimmy007forsure @RunDeathIsNear Thanks, for me the main fact is OO, importing templates is just another common workflow. What would be specific to LNCS?
I have just added another profile to mu list of candidates which were working on closely related technologies to Bitcoin before 2008 in my book "Satoshi Nakamoto & the Origins of Bitcoin". There was so much going on that it is shocking to see everyone having tight blinkers on.
@jimmy007forsure @RunDeathIsNear How do you come to this conclusion, was Satoshi Nakamoto not startting from a blank file with OpenOffice for his whitepaper?
@jimmy007forsure @CoinControversy@marttimalmi@jeffjohnroberts @juliusgu23 @CodyKingham @ducree @PeterScottMorg1 Not really. But from my point of view cryptic allusions are the style of dubious conspiracy theorists, misguiding naive believers, but not contributing to finding truth.
@PeterScottMorg1 @jimmy007forsure @CoinControversy@marttimalmi@jeffjohnroberts @juliusgu23 @CodyKingham @ducree There is simply no definite answer without insider knowledge. How would a firm proof look like? Among the usual suspects, it could only be Adam Back, but there are dozens of more credible candidates out there.
@jimmy007forsure @CoinControversy@marttimalmi@jeffjohnroberts @juliusgu23 @CodyKingham @ducree @PeterScottMorg1 Depends on your definition of OPSEC. In my view there is a very strong psychological dimension, being able to resist fame and fortune (so far) is extremely difficult, almost 'inhuman'.