Spanish civil war is funny cause on other side you had:
-Long serving military personel, officers and soldiers
-monarchists
-Falangists
And on another side you have:
-chicks in heels
-necrophilic nun rapists
-couple of shitty authors
And the second one was the establishment!
“You must understand. The Leading Bolsheviks who took over Russia were not Russians. They hated Russians. They hated Christians. Driven by ethnic hatred they tortured and slaughtered millions of Russians without a shred of human remorse. The October Revolution was not what you call in America the 'Russian Revolution.' It was an invasion and conquest over the Russian people. More of my countrymen suffered horrific crimes at their bloodstained hands than any people or nation ever suffered in the entirety of human history. It cannot be understated! Bolshevism was the greatest human slaughter of all time. The fact that most of the world in ignorant of this reality is proof that the global media itself is in the hands of the perpetrators. We cannot state that all ✡️ are Bolsheviks. But without ✡️ there would have been no Bolshevism. For a ✡️, nothing is more insulting than the truth. The blood-maddened ✡️ terrorists murdered 66 million in Russia from 1918-1957."
- Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn (1918-2008), Nobel Prize-winning Novelist, Historian and Victim of ✡️ Bolshevism
@politicalmath You can totally stand up to an tyrannical government
You just actually have to kill them
Not "peaceful protest" at them while they beat and arrest your daughters for being raped
Violence is the supreme authority from which all other authority is derived.
“Equal rights? On what basis? We have been on this Earth for thousands of years, with plows and weapons, our work and our blood. Equal rights with those who have been here for a hundred, ten, or just five years?”
- Corneliu Zelea Codreanu
I’m no fan of Charles I, but the day of his execution was a cold one, so he asked to be given an undershirt so he wouldn’t shiver and be mistaken as fearful by the crowd watching his beheading.
Wow that was some of the worst garbage I've ever seen
Astonishingly lazy. It might be a perfect case study for the mind of the spiteful mutant turbolib
I'm reminded of the King of France during the French Revolution:
"Louis spent his last night calmly in the Temple prison. He awoke early, heard Mass, and received communion from his Irish confessor, Abbé Henry Essex Edgeworth de Firmont. He wrote his last will and testament and entrusted personal items (his seal to his son, his wedding ring to Marie Antoinette) to the priest.
On the advice of his confessor, he avoided a highly emotional final meeting with his wife and children to spare them further suffering.
Louis showed remarkable dignity and firmness, which surprised even his executioners. He removed his coat and cravat, had his hair cut, and allowed his hands to be bound with his own handkerchief (after initially resisting rope, persuaded by the priest who reminded him of Christ’s sacrifice).
He walked firmly across the scaffold. According to the most detailed contemporary account from Abbé Edgeworth, Louis silenced the drums with his presence and spoke in a loud, clear voice:
“I die innocent of all the crimes laid to my charge; I pardon those who have occasioned my death; and I pray to God that the blood you are going to shed may never be visited on France.”
As he was being strapped to the plank, he reportedly exclaimed:
“My people, I die innocent!”
And turning to the executioners: words affirming his innocence and expressing the hope that his blood would “cement the happiness of the French” (according to executioner Charles-Henri Sanson’s own account).
--
Eric Kripke and his ilk are children of the French Revolution. They can't stand the idea of nobility or bravery, it disgusts them because it forces them to reflect on their multitude of inadequacies. They must create an imagined world where powerful men are as pathetic as themselves. This is mere wishcasting, dressed up in computer graphics and film.
It's just like The Lord of the Flies, wherein the book depicts pathetic chaos ensuing after being removed from civilizing forces. But in reality, the event that inspired the book had the children cooperate and thrive until they were saved. This annoyed the author, so he rewrote reality itself. Wishcasting.
As a rule, criminals *are* materially deprived & socially disprivileged, & they do tend to have harsh & cruel childhoods
The arrow of causality in that relationship can really only point in one of two directions, which is why politics is roughly binary
The LW causal model is silly for reasons that have been heavily explored - but the RW model is ugly & depressing, which is the real reason people reject it
Everybody wants to root for the underdog, the diamond in the rough, because they want to believe that people (& especially themselves, & most especially their children) have potential to overcome & transcend, to be more than they seem
There's a reason the best stories work this way - it's either reflective of something true, or at minimum something humans have always needed to believe & tell each other
If your politics pick a fight with that quality of human nature, your politics are going to lose
Napoleón Bonaparte mientras conversaba con el general Bertrand acerca de Jesucristo durante su exilio en Santa Elena, alrededor de 1820:
«Yo conozco a los hombres, y les digo que Jesucristo no es un hombre.
Las mentes superficiales ven una semejanza entre Cristo y los fundadores de imperios, y los dioses de otras religiones. Esa semejanza no existe. Hay entre el cristianismo y cualquier otra religión la distancia del infinito.
Alejandro, César, Carlomagno y yo mismo fundamos imperios. Pero ¿sobre qué descansaron las creaciones de nuestro genio? Sobre la fuerza.
Jesucristo fundó su imperio sobre el amor, y en esta misma hora millones de hombres morirían por Él.
Yo pienso que entiendo algo de la naturaleza humana, y les digo: todos esos fueron hombres, y yo soy un hombre; ninguno es como Él. Jesucristo fue más que un hombre. Entre Él y cualquier otra persona en el mundo no hay posible término de comparación.»
O Risério falou sobre isso:
"[...] No começo deste século, o sociólogo identitarista Antonio Sérgio Guimarães dizia que, pelo simples fato de pretos serem socialmente estigmatizados, mestiços brasileiros jamais se diriam negros. Respondi na época que diriam, sim: desde que houvesse vantagens objetivas – emprego e renda, principalmente –, a “lei de Gerson” iria se impor. E é o que vemos hoje: com patrocínios do poder econômico privado e benesses do poder público, tudo quanto é mestiço corre para se declarar “negro”, passando a viver assim com uma identidade de empréstimo. Discurso induzido e reforçado pela mídia, quando vemos, em novelas da Globo, mestiços quase brancos fazerem discursos inflamados como “negros”. É a cooptação generalizada. Ser mestiço, hoje, não dá camisa a ninguém. O negócio é ser negão, mesmo que a pessoa não tenha uma só gota de sangue negro em suas veias".
@Lennonn622@Consagrado_1895@utismo_@mombaque Cientistas?! Outro questionamento ao seu post: pq raios, cientistas, que eram ricos o bastante para pagar suas formações, não utilizavam suas economias para bancar suas pesquisas, preferindo a grana de nobres obscurantistas?! Você, acidentalmente, tá pondo a credibilidade deles +